Motion and Memorandum of Points and Authorities — No. 2:21-cr-00027 (Dkt. 55, D. Nev.)

Summary

The United States of America's Unopposed Motion for an Interlocutory Order of Sale and Memorandum of Points and Authorities, Document 55 filed November 12, 2021 in Case 2:21-cr-00027-RFB-DJA, United States v. Jorge Abramovs, in the District of Nevada. It asks the court to authorize the United States Marshals Service to sell a 2021 BMW M850i xDrive Gran Coupe, vehicle identification number WBAGV8C07MCF00249, listed in the Bill of Particulars (ECF No. 30). It gives six grounds, including continuing deterioration and depreciation, accruing storage costs and the defendant's agreement through counsel. The procedural history cites the January 27, 2021 eleven-count indictment for bank fraud and related counts, and a December 13, 2021 trial date.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

           Case 2:21-cr-00027-RFB-DJA Document 55 Filed 11/12/21 Page 1 of 5



 1 CHRISTOPHER CHIOU
   Acting United States Attorney
 2 Nevada Bar No. 14853
   JAMES A. BLUM
 3 Assistant United States Attorney
   501 Las Vegas Boulevard South, Suite 1100
 4 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
   (702) 388-6336
 5 james.blum@usdoj.gov
   Attorneys for the United States
 6

 7

 8                              UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                                     DISTRICT OF NEVADA
 9
10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                       2:21-CR-027-RFB-DJA

11                Plaintiff,                       United States of America’s Unopposed
                                                   Motion for an Interlocutory Order of Sale
12         v.                                      of 2021 BMW M850i xDrive Gran Coupe,
                                                   white in color, with vehicle identification
13 JORGE ABRAMOVS,                                 number WBAGV8C07MCF00249, bearing
                                                   Nevada license plate 653M21
14                Defendant.

15         MOTION AND MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES

16         The United States of America (United States) respectfully moves this Court for an

17 Order for an interlocutory judicial sale of the 2021 BMW M850i xDrive Gran Coupe,

18 white in color, held in the name of Jorge Abramovs (Abramovs), with vehicle identification

19 number WBAGV8C07MCF00249, bearing Nevada license plate 653M21 (2021 BMW)

20 listed in the Bill of Particulars, ECF No. 30, authorizing the United States Marshals Service

21 (USMS) to sell the 2021 BMW.

22         The grounds for granting the Order for an Interlocutory Sale of the 2021 BMW are

23 as follows. First, the 2021 BMW continues to deteriorate pending the trial of Abramovs.

24 Second, the value of the 2021 BMW continues to depreciate. Third, the storage costs and

25 other maintenance costs of the 2021 BMW will continue to accrue against its value. Fourth,

26 the sooner the 2021 BMW is sold, the more net sale proceeds will exist. Fifth, this Court is

27 authorized to approve interlocutory sales. Sixth, Abramovs, through his counsel, has agreed

28 to the interlocutory sale.
            Case 2:21-cr-00027-RFB-DJA Document 55 Filed 11/12/21 Page 2 of 5



 1          This Motion is made and is based on the papers and pleadings on file herein and this

 2   Memorandum of Points and Authorities.

 3   I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY

 4      1. On January 27, 2021, the grand jury returned an 11-Count Criminal Indictment

 5   charging Abramovs in Counts 1-5 with bank fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344, in

 6   Count 6 with false statement to a financial institution in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1014, and

 7   in Counts 7-11 with monetary transactions in criminally derived property in violation of 18

 8   U.S.C. § 1957. Criminal Indictment, ECF No. 16.

 9      2. Abramovs is currently scheduled to go to trial on December 13, 2021, with calendar

10   call scheduled for December 7, 2021, ECF No. 36.

11   II. ARGUMENT

12          This Court has authority to issue an Interlocutory Order of Sale. “At any time before

13   entry of a final forfeiture order, the court, in accordance with Supplemental Rule [(Supp.

14   R.)] G(7) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, may order the interlocutory sale of

15   property alleged to be forfeitable.” Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(7).

16          On motion by a party or a person having custody of the property, the court
            may order all or part of the property sold if: (A) the property is perishable or
17          at risk of deterioration, decay, or injury by being detained in custody pending
            the action; (B) the expense of keeping the property is excessive or is
18          disproportionate to its fair market value; (C) the property is subject to a
            mortgage or to taxes on which the owner is in default; or (D) the court finds
19          other good cause.
20          Supp. R. G(7)(b) (paragraphs omitted).
21   Only one of the grounds for interlocutory sale is required since Supp. R. G(7)(b) is

22   disjunctive. See Shelter Cove Marina, Ltd. v. M/Y ISABELLA, No. 3:17-cv-01578-GPC-

23   BLM, 2017 WL 5906673, at *2 (S.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2017) (explaining that another

24   Supplemental Rule for interlocutory sale with similar language is disjunctive); Cal. Yacht

25   Marina-Chula Vista, LLC v. S/V OPILY, No. 14-cv-1215-BAS-BGS, 2015 WL 1197540, at

26   *2 (S.D. Cal. Mar. 16, 2015) (explaining the same).

27          Five reasons for the interlocutory sale apply in this case regarding the 2021 BMW:

28   (1) it will deteriorate while the criminal prosecution and forfeiture processes are completed;
                                                     2
            Case 2:21-cr-00027-RFB-DJA Document 55 Filed 11/12/21 Page 3 of 5



 1   (2) the storage and maintenance fees will continue to accrue; (3) the value of the vehicle

 2   depreciates over time; (4) the sooner the vehicle is sold, more net sale proceeds will be

 3   available; and (5) the defendant has agreed to the interlocutory sale. Supp. R. G(7)(b); Fed.

 4   R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(7); see United States v. One Parcel of Real Prop. Described as Lot 41, Berryhill

 5   Farm Estates, 128 F.3d 1386, 1389–90 (10th Cir.1997) (explaining the district court orders an

 6   interlocutory sale when the property is deteriorating and decaying).

 7          “A sale must be made by a United States agency that has authority to sell the

 8   property, by the agency’s contractor, or by any person the court designates.” Supp. R.

 9   G(7)(b)(ii). In this case, the USMS will sell the property as “governed by 28 U.S.C. §§ 2001,

10   2002, and 2004, unless all parties, with the court’s approval, agree to the sale, aspects of the

11   sale, or different procedures.” Supp. R. G(7)(b)(iii).

12          In United States v. Guzman, No. 3:08-CR-23-2, 2013 WL 12228400 (M.D. Tenn. Oct.

13   7, 2013), the district court found and held:

14          The Government has presented evidence suggesting that the value of the
            [property] continues to decrease with time and, as of last month, was
15          approximately $16,500.00 less than the amount the Government had paid for
            storage and maintenance up to that point. Thus, the Court finds that the
16          expense of keeping the [property] is both excessive and disproportionate to its
            fair market value. Given the apparent continued depreciation in value and
17          rising cost of maintaining the [property], the Court finds an interlocutory sale
            is the best way to preserve its remaining value.
18
            Id. at *2 (brackets added); see United States v. Haley, No. 11–CR–0540–WDQ,
19          2011 WL 6202787, at *1 (D. Md. Dec. 8, 2011).
20          Without the interlocutory sale, the property cannot be sold until the court enters the

21   Final Order of Forfeiture. 21 U.S.C. § 853(h); Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(4). If the government

22   waits for the Final Order of Forfeiture, the value of the vehicle will have deteriorated and

23   depreciated even further, and the storage and maintenance fees will continue to accrue.

24          “The sale proceeds are substitute res subject to forfeiture in place of the property

25   that was sold[, and] the United States must maintain them in an interest-bearing account.”

26   Supp. R. G(7)(b)(iv); United States v. King, No. 10 CR. 122 (JGK), 2010 WL 4739791, at *4

27   (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 12, 2010).

28   ///
                                                       3
            Case 2:21-cr-00027-RFB-DJA Document 55 Filed 11/12/21 Page 4 of 5



 1          After paying the costs and expenses to sell the vehicle and the storage and

 2   maintenance fees are subtracted, the net sale proceeds will be substituted in lieu of the 2021

 3   BMW. See United States v. Plunk, 511 F.3d 918, 922-23 (9th Cir. 2007) (explaining that the

 4   value of the property is the value when the property is sold); United States v. Marshall, 338

 5   F.3d 990, 993-94 (9th Cir. 2003) (noting that the property’s valuation date is the date

 6   related to net sale proceeds); see also 21 U.S.C. § 853(g) (“Any income accruing to or

 7   derived from property ordered forfeited under this section may be used to offset ordinary

 8   and necessary expenses to the property which are required by law, or which are necessary

 9   to protect the interests of the United States or third parties.”); 21 U.S.C. §853(j); 19 U.S.C.

10   § 1609(a) (stating that after deducting expenses, the proceeds of sale is the value of the asset

11   for depositing); 19 U.S.C. § 1611 (stating that the sale proceeds must cover costs or the

12   asset should be destroyed); 19 U.S.C. § 1613(a) and (b) (stating that sale proceeds are

13   reduced by payment of all property expenses of the proceedings of forfeiture and sale,

14   including expenses of seizures, maintaining the custody of the property, advertising and

15   sale, and any additional costs taxed by the court).

16          Abramovs has agreed through his counsel, Margaret W. Lambrose, to the

17   interlocutory sale of the property. The United States requests that the Court allow

18   Abramovs and the government to sell the property through USMS at a public auction.

19   ///

20   ///

21   ///

22   ///

23   ///

24   ///

25   ///

26   ///

27   ///

28   ///
                                                     4
           Case 2:21-cr-00027-RFB-DJA Document 55 Filed 11/12/21 Page 5 of 5



 1   III. CONCLUSION

 2          For the reasons stated above, the United States respectfully requests that the Court

 3   order the sale of the property described herein on the terms and conditions set forth above.

 4          DATED: November 10, 2021.

 5                                                     Respectfully submitted,
 6                                                     CHRISTOPHER CHIOU
                                                       Acting United States Attorney
 7
                                                       /s/ James A. Blum_____________
 8                                                     JAMES A. BLUM
                                                       Assistant United States Attorney
 9

10

11
                                                IT IS SO ORDERED:
12

13
                                                RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
14                                              UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
15                                              DATED:      November 10, 2021

16

17

18

19
20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28
                                                   5


File and source

File

55.pdf

Size

174,488 bytes

SHA-256

09d39f45bf56fd12714ae17b46d2000ae9482f1175398b055b66ef8f5bd5f27d

Our copy

55.pdf

Original

No public link identified.