Memorandum Opinion and Order — No. 3:20-cr-00484 (Dkt. 98, N.D. Tex.)

Summary

A memorandum opinion and order, United States v. Dinesh Sah, Case No. 3:20-cr-484-S, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, filed May 23, 2022 as Document 98. It concerns third-party petitions under 21 U.S.C. § 853(n) by Panin Hitech Solutions Pvt. Ltd. and Pankaj Gohil to $3 million Sah transferred to two bank accounts in Mumbai, India, in July and August 2020. The court finds that, taking the petitioners' allegations as true, the government knew or reasonably should have known they were interested parties, that the government does not dispute it did not attempt direct notice, and that the petitioners did not admit actual notice. It denies the government's motions to dismiss the petitions as untimely (ECF Nos. 88, 89). The order is over the name of U.S. Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used