Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Memorandum Opinion and Order granting the United States unopposed — No. 5:24-cr-00022 (Dkt. 36, E.D. Ky.)Search ⌕

Memorandum Opinion and Order granting the United States unopposed — No. 5:24-cr-00022 (Dkt. 36, E.D. Ky.)

Summary

A Memorandum Opinion and Order in United States v. Vonnie J. McDaniels, Criminal Action No. 5: 24-022-DCR, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, Central Division at Lexington, dated and filed June 27, 2024 as Doc #: 36. It notes that McDaniels is charged with wire fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1343, aggravated identity theft under 18 U.S.C. § 1028A and money laundering under 18 U.S.C. § 1957, relating to an alleged scheme to defraud COVID-19 relief programs. The court grants the government's unopposed motion in limine to admit, under Rules 803(6)-(8), certified business records including PPP application records from Blue Vine, Inc. and Kabbage, Inc. and bank records. It also admits certifications of the absence of IRS filing records and unemployment wage reports, and a record of the 2017 administrative dissolution of V&R Foods LLC.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Memorandum Opinion and Order granting the United States unopposed — No. 5:24-cr-00022 (Dkt. 36, E.D. Ky.).” Original at www.govinfo.gov. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/memorandum-opinion-and-order-granting-the-united-states-unopposed-no-5-5f0274c035/, SHA-256 fd416a0a630e3699b480c0fa971a8c15aff35b69d79f9f19302b1bbb5fd1f356.

Full text

Case: 5:24-cr-00022-DCR-MAS Doc #: 36 Filed: 06/27/24 Page: 1 of 7 - Page ID#:
                                <pageID>



                          UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                          EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
                                CENTRAL DIVISION
                                   (at Lexington)

  UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                     )
                                                )
         Plaintiff,                             )         Criminal Action No. 5: 24-022-DCR
                                                )
  V.                                            )
                                                )
  VONNIE J. MCDANIELS,                          )           MEMORANDUM OPINION
                                                )               AND ORDER
         Defendant.                             )

                                    ***   ***       ***   ***

       Defendant Vonnie McDaniels has been charged with committing wire fraud in violation

of 18 U.S.C. § 1343, aggravated identity theft in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028A, money

laundering in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1957, and violating conditions of his release pursuant

to 18 U.S.C. § 3147. These charges relate to an alleged scheme to defraud COVID-19 relief

programs. [Record No. 1] In advance of the jury trial, the United States has filed an unopposed

motion in limine to admit certain documents as business records, lack of business records, and

public record pursuant to Rule 803(6)-(8) of the Federal Rules of Evidence. [Record Nos. 33,

35] The motion will be granted for the reasons outlined below.

                                             I.

       The United States alleges that Defendant McDaniels executed a scheme to defraud

COVID-19 pandemic relief programs, including the United States Small Business

Administration’s Payment Protection Program and Economic Injury Disaster Loan program,

as well as Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government’s Housing Stabilization Program

(“HSP”). Specifically, the government contends that McDaniels submitted false statements


                                             -1-
Case: 5:24-cr-00022-DCR-MAS Doc #: 36 Filed: 06/27/24 Page: 2 of 7 - Page ID#:
                                <pageID>



and documents about his businesses and rental properties to obtain government funds. It also

asserts that McDaniels committed aggravated identity theft by using the identity of his two

tenants as part of the HSP rental relief application.

                                              II.

       Rule 803(6) of the Federal Rules of Evidence “permits business records to be admitted

into evidence despite the normal bar against the introduction of hearsay provided that the

records: (1) were ‘created in the course of a regularly conducted business activity;’ (2) were

‘kept in the regular course of that business; (3) resulted from a ‘regular practice of that

business’ to create such documents; and (4) were ‘created by a person with knowledge of the

transaction or from information transmitted by a person with knowledge.’” United States v.

Ramer, 883 F.3d 659, 677–78 (6th Cir. 2018) (quoting Yoder & Frey Auctioneers, Inc. v.

EquipmentFacts, LLC, 774 F.3d 1065, 1071–72 (6th Cir. 2014).          These conditions may be

shown “by a certification that complies with Rule 902(11).” Ramer, 883 F.3d at 678 (quoting

Rule 803(6)(D) of the Federal Rules of Evidence). A business record is self-authenticating

once it is certified. See Fed R. Evid. 902.

       Generally, the business records exception “is based on the indicia of reliability that

attaches to a record created or maintained by an employer in the ordinary or regular course of

their business.” Peak v. Kubota Tractor Corp., 559 F. App’x 517, 523 (6th Cir. 2014) (quoting

Cobbins v. Tenn. Dep't. of Transp., 566 F.3d 582, 588 (6th Cir. 2009)). Once a proper

foundation has been laid for the introduction of a business record, it should be admitted “absent

specific and credible evidence of untrustworthiness,” and the jury should be permitted to

determine the weight to give to the record. Peak, 559 F. App’x at 523 (citing United States v.

Hathaway, 798 F.2d 902, 907 (6th Cir. 2006)). Whether to grant a motion in limine falls within
                                               -2-
Case: 5:24-cr-00022-DCR-MAS Doc #: 36 Filed: 06/27/24 Page: 3 of 7 - Page ID#:
                                <pageID>



the sound discretion of the trial court. Branham v. Thomas Cooley Law Sch., 689 F.3d 558,

560 (6th Cir. 2012).

       The United States seeks to admit seven sets of documents as business records pursuant

to Rule 803(6). Most of the records reference the business activities of V&M Leawood of

Frankfort LLC and V&R Foods LLC. Defendant McDaniels is the sole member of each LLC.

The United States provided McDaniels with notice of its intent to offer each record, as well as

the opportunity to challenge each record’s admissibility. To determine admissibility, the Court

independently analyzes each record request.

               Blue Vine, Inc. Payment Protection Program (PPP) Records

       McDaniels submitted two applications for the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”)

to Blue Vine, Inc., a federally insured financial institution approved by the Small Business

Administration to process PPP loan applications. He submitted one application for V&M

Leawood of Frankfort LLC and another for V&R Foods LLC. A representative of Blue Vine,

Inc. provided the United States with these records as they are maintained in the regular conduct

of business along with a business records certification. This constitutes self-authentication

pursuant to Rule 902(11). FED. R. EVID. 902(11).

                                Kabbage, Inc. PPP Records

       McDaniels submitted two PPP applications to this federally insured financial institution

for V&R Foods LLC, including a “first draw” and “second draw” application. Valerie Holland,

a paralegal at Kabbage, Inc., provided the records the company maintains in the regular course

of business to the United States and attached a business records certification, satisfying Rule

902(11).



                                              -3-
    Case: 5:24-cr-00022-DCR-MAS Doc #: 36 Filed: 06/27/24 Page: 4 of 7 - Page ID#:
                                    <pageID>



                           Commonwealth of Kentucky Records

         The United States intends to introduce records produced by Kentucky’s Department of

Facilities and Support Services. These records “include leases, lease modification documents,

records relating to the cancelation of the lease, and records relating to a fraudulent letter

purportedly from the Department of Facilities.” [Record No. 33] Brian Hoover, a property

management branch manager with Kentucky, provided these documents to the United States

along with a business records certification. Thus, Rule 902(11) is satisfied.

                                  Kentucky Bank Records

         Kentucky Bank issued a mortgage on 911 Leawood Drive to V&M Leawood of

Frankfort LLC. The records the United States intends to introduce refer to communications

between McDaniels and Kentucky Bank regarding the process for obtaining the mortgage.

They also show purportedly falsified documents, mortgage documents, and an internal memo

created by Kentucky Bank. Melinda Biddle, a records custodian at Kentucky Bank, provided

these documents to the United States along with a business records certification, satisfying

Rule 902(11).

                                 JP Morgan Chase Records

         The United States received three sets of records from JP Morgan Chase Bank. 1 The

first set V&M Leawood of Frankfort LLC includes account opening documents and statements

from June 2019 to February 2020. The second set for V&M Leawood includes monthly

statements from February 2020 to April 2021, reflecting potentially unlawful transactions. The

third set of records include statements regarding V&M Leawood, McDaniels’ personal


1
       These bank documents relate to the account for V&M Leawood of Frankfort LLC
ending in *0179.
                                             -4-
 Case: 5:24-cr-00022-DCR-MAS Doc #: 36 Filed: 06/27/24 Page: 5 of 7 - Page ID#:
                                 <pageID>



account, and credit card statements. These records reflect a potentially unlawful deposit of

funds. JP Morgan Chase Bank provided business record certifications from custodians for

each set of records, satisfying the rules for admissibility.

                             Navy Federal Credit Union Records

       The United States received two sets of Defendant McDaniels’ Navy Federal Credit

Union records. The first set contains documents from 2017 to June 2020 while the second

contains documents from June 2020 to October 2021. These records suggest potentially

unlawful transactions occurred. The Navy Federal Credit Union provided business record

certifications from custodians for each set of these records, satisfying the rules for

admissibility.

                                  Google Subscriber Records

       As a landlord, McDaniels allegedly submitted applications to obtain funding from the

HSP through the Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government for two of his rental properties.

Both the landlord and the tenant were required to submit applications. The United States

obtained subscriber records from Google LLC for the email addresses used on the tenant

portions of the associated HSP applications. Katrina Thompson, a records custodian with

Google LLC, provided these documents to the United States along with a business records

certification. These records meet the requirements of Rule 902(11).

                                              III.

       The United States also seeks to introduce two sets of documents for the purpose of

proving absence of records regarding a regularly conducted activity under Rule 803(7) of the

Federal Rules of Evidence. This rule permits the admission of the absence of a record

regarding a regularly conducted activity if: (1) “the evidence is admitted to prove that the
                                               -5-
 Case: 5:24-cr-00022-DCR-MAS Doc #: 36 Filed: 06/27/24 Page: 6 of 7 - Page ID#:
                                 <pageID>



matter did not occur or exist;” (2) “a record was regularly kept for a matter of that kind;” and

(3) “the opponent does not show that the possible source of the information or other

circumstances indicate a lack of trustworthiness.” FED. R. EVID. 803(7)(A)-(C).

                                     Lack of IRS Records

       The Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) certified that it lacks filing records for

McDaniels, V&R Foods LLC, and V&M Leawood of Frankfort LLC. The certification states

that the Commissioner of the IRS has custody of federal tax records, notes that the

Commissioner would maintain the records listed on the form and would have access to the

records, and signifies that no such records were located. Specifically, “the IRS stated that it

did not have tax returns filed for any of these entities.” [Record No. 33] These statements

“were certified to be true, signed by an IRS disclosure specialist, and affixed with an IRS seal.”

Id. These records ay be introduced under Rule 803(7) as a result.

                    Lack of Office of Unemployment Insurance Records

       The Kentucky Labor Cabinet responded to two grand jury subpoenas seeking

“Quarterly Unemployment Wage and Tax Reports” for V&R Foods LLC from 2017 to 2021

and V&M Leawood of Frankfort LLC from 2018 to 2023. [Record No. 33] The Office of

Unemployment Insurance provided letters stating that it did not have responsive records. On

May 9, 2024, a records custodian of Kentucky Office of Unemployment Insurance provided a

certification regarding the lack of these business records on file. Id. Specifically, the custodian

did not have Quarterly Unemployment Wage and Tax Reports for the defendant’s companies

involved in this matter, even though it was regular practice to record these documents if they

had been filed. As such, these records can be admitted pursuant to Rule 803(7).



                                               -6-
 Case: 5:24-cr-00022-DCR-MAS Doc #: 36 Filed: 06/27/24 Page: 7 of 7 - Page ID#:
                                 <pageID>



                                              IV.

       Finally, the United States intends to introduce a certified record of the 2017

administrative dissolution of V&R Foods LLC from the Kentucky Secretary of State. Rule

803(8) of the Federal Rules of Evidence allows a record or statement of a public office to be

admitted if “it sets out . . . the office’s activities, a matter observed while under a legal duty to

report” and “the opponent does not show that the source of information or other circumstances

indicate a lack of trustworthiness.” FED. R. EVID. 803(8). Under KRS 14.040, the Kentucky

Secretary of State certifies its official acts under its seal. This record is admissible pursuant to

Rule 803(8).

                                               V.

       Based on the foregoing, it is hereby

       ORDERED that the United States’ motion in limine [Record No. 33] is GRANTED.

       Dated: June 27, 2024.




                                                -7-


File and source

File
36-memorandum-opinion-and-order-granting-the-united-states-unop.pdf
Size
302,709 bytes
SHA-256
fd416a0a630e3699b480c0fa971a8c15aff35b69d79f9f19302b1bbb5fd1f356
Our copy
36-memorandum-opinion-and-order-granting-the-united-states-unop.pdf
Original
www.govinfo.gov
Back to top