Maxine Waters, US Congress, Summary (OpenSecrets)
Summary
An OpenSecrets campaign finance summary page for Rep. Maxine Waters, Representative (D - CA) for California District 43, covering the 2019 - 2020 election cycle. It reports that the campaign committee raised $1,822,070, spent $1,881,097 and had $333,137 cash on hand and $170,884 in debts, with a last report dated November 23, 2020. Top contributors listed include Paul, Weiss et al at $107,200 and Votesane PAC at $72,000, and top industries include Insurance at $217,922 and Lawyers/Law Firms at $195,654. PAC contributions account for 46.82% of the committee's funds, and the page explains that its figures are based on Federal Election Commission data.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cited in: Maxine Waters
Archived web capture. Preserved source — captured from www.opensecrets.org; archived 2026-07-04.
Cite this document
“Maxine Waters, US Congress, Summary (OpenSecrets).”
Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/maxine-waters-u-s-congress-summary-chrome-632edb205e/
, SHA-256 65826de4669711579ca7cc6eaf8b8e5416748c4a72e0281baa1c5b498e37b3c5.Full text
Rep. Maxine Waters - California District 43
Maxine Waters
Representative (D - CA)
- Financial Services, Chairman
First Election:
1990
Next Election:
2020
TOP INDUSTRIES 2019 - 2020
Insurance
$217,922
Lawyers/Law Firms
$195,654
TOP CONTRIBUTORS 2019 - 2020
Paul, Weiss et al
$107,200
Votesane PAC
$72,000
Campaign Committee Fundraising, 2019 - 2020
Raised: | $1,822,070
Spent: | $1,881,097
Cash on hand: | $333,137
Debts: | $170,884
LAST REPORT: 11/23/2020
Top Contributors, 2019 - 2020
Contributor | Total | Individuals | PACs
Paul, Weiss et al | $107,200 | $107,200 | $0
Votesane PAC | $72,000 | $72,000 | $0
Apollo Global Management | $23,805 | $23,805 | $0
Rock Holdings | $21,300 | $16,300 | $5,000
Law Office of Eric M Kamerath | $16,400 | $16,400 | $0
Top Industries, 2019 - 2020
Industry | Total | Individuals | PACs
Insurance | $217,922 | $6,422 | $211,500
Lawyers/Law Firms | $195,654 | $155,155 | $40,499
Securities & Investment | $125,765 | $46,265 | $79,500
Real Estate | $113,681 | $43,181 | $70,500
Misc Issues | $73,000 | $73,000 | $0
Total Raised vs. Average Raised
Source of Funds (Campaign Committee), 2019 - 2020
PAC Contributions*: 46.82%
Large Individual Contributions: 30.40%
Other: 19.86%
Small Individual Contributions (< $200): 2.91%
Candidate self-financing: 0.00%
PAC Contributions* | $853,201 | 46.82%
Large Individual Contributions | $553,859 | 30.40%
Other | $361,942 | 19.86%
Small Individual Contributions (< $200) | $53,068 | 2.91%
Candidate self-financing | $0 | 0.00%
*Includes contributions from other candidate committees.
NOTE: All the numbers on this page are for the 2019 - 2020
election cycle and based on Federal Election Commission data released
electronically on 01/10/21 for Fundraising totals,
Source of Funds and Total Raised vs Average, and on 12/04/20 for
Top Contributors and Industries. ("Help! The numbers don't add up...")
WHY DON'T THE NUMBERS ADD UP? Sometimes it's hard to make apple-to-apple comparisons across some of the pages in a candidate's
profile. Here's why: Summary numbers - specifically "Total Raised and Spent" and "PAC/Individual Split" - are
based on summary reports filed by the candidates with the Federal Election Commission. All other numbers in
these profiles ("Quality of Disclosure," "Geography" and "Special Interests") are derived from detailed FEC
reports that itemize all contributions of $200 or more. There is also a time lag in posting the information. While summary numbers are reported almost
immediately by the FEC -- and listed quickly on OpenSecrets -- processing and analyzing the detailed records
takes much longer. For that reason, summary numbers are usually higher (and more current) than the numbers based
on detailed records. HOW CURRENT ARE THESE FIGURES? The figures in these profiles are taken from databases uploaded by the FEC to the internet on
the first day of every month. Those databases are only as current as the FEC has been able to compile by that
date (see the note above about lag times for data entry). The Center updates figures for "Total Raised and Spent" and for "PAC/Individual Split" a few
days after the first of the month. The remaining figures - based on detailed contribution data - is updated
by the Center after the 20th of every month. This gives us time to analyze the contributions and categorize
them by industry and interest group.
The organizations themselves did not
donate , rather the money came from the organizations' PACs,
their individual members or employees or owners, and those individuals'
immediate families. Organization totals include subsidiaries and affiliates.
Why (and How)
We Use Donors' Employer/Occupation Information
The organizations listed as "Top Contributors" reached this list for one
of two reasons: either they gave through a political action committee sponsored by the
organization, or individuals connected with the organization contributed directly to the
candidate. Under federal law, all contributions over $200 must be itemized and the
donor's occupation and employer must be requested and disclosed, if provided. The Center
uses that employer/occupation information to identify the donor's economic interest. We
do this in two ways: First, we apply a code to the contribution, identifying the industry.
Totals for industries (and larger economic sectors) can be seen in each candidate and
race profile, and in the Industry Profile section of the OpenSecrets website. Second, we standardize the name of the donor's employer. If enough
contributions came in from people connected with that same employer, the organization's
name winds up on the Top Contributor list. Of course, it is impossible to know either the economic interest that made
each individual contribution possible or the motivation for each individual giver.
However, the patterns of contributions provide critical information for voters, researchers
and others. That is why Congress mandated that candidates and political parties request
employer information from contributors and publicly report it when the contributor provides it. In some cases, a cluster of contributions from the same organization may indicate
a concerted effort by that organization to "bundle" contributions to the candidate. In other
cases—both with private companies and with government agencies, non-profits and educational
institutions—the reason for the contributions may be completely unrelated to the organization. Showing these clusters of contributions from people associated with particular
organizations provides a valuable—and unique—way of understanding where a candidate is
getting his or her financial support. Knowing those groups is also useful after the election,
as issues come before Congress and the administration that may affect those organizations and
their industries.
METHODOLOGY
The figures profiled here include money from two sources: These contributors were
either the sponsors of a PAC that gave to the politician, or they were listed as an individual
donor's employer. Donors who give more than $200 to any
federal candidate, PAC or party committee must list their occupation and
employer. Based on that information, the donor is given an economic code. These totals are conservative,
as not all of the individual contributions have yet
been classified by the Center. In cases where two or more people from the same family contributed, the income-earner's
occupation/employer is assigned to all non-wage earning family members. If, for instance, Henry Jones
lists his employer as First National Bank, his wife Matilda lists "Homemaker" and 12-year old Tammy
shows up as "Student," the Center would identify all their contributions as being related to the
"First National Bank" since that's the source of the family's income. Although individual contributions are generally categorized based on the donor's
occupation/employer, in some cases individuals may be classified instead as ideological donors.
A contribution to a candidate may be given an ideological code, rather than an economic code, if
the contributor gives to an ideological political action committee AND the candidate has received
money from PACs representing that same ideological interest.
Feel free to distribute or cite this material, but please credit the
Center for Responsive Politics. For permission to reprint for commercial uses,
such as textbooks, contact the Center: info[at]crp.org
Fundraising Events
No event data to display.
Event data provided by: politicalpartytime.org
We follow the money. You make it possible.
Select an amount to make a donation.
Count Cash & Make Change
Sign up for our newsletter to track money’s influence on U.S. elections and public policy.
File and source
- File
- maxine-waters-u-s-congress-summary-chrome.html
- Size
- 74,461 bytes
- SHA-256
- 65826de4669711579ca7cc6eaf8b8e5416748c4a72e0281baa1c5b498e37b3c5
- Original
- No public link identified.