Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Lincoln County School District's Use of Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Funds (ED-OIG/F24NY0204)

Lincoln County School District's Use of Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Funds (ED-OIG/F24NY0204)

Summary

Final Flash Report Lincoln County School District's Use of Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Funds, Control Number ED-OIG/F24NY0204, issued March 31, 2025 by the U.S. Department of Education Office of Inspector General, Audit Services, in a letter to Superintendent of Public Instruction Jhone M. Ebert of the Nevada Department of Education. The report states that Lincoln, a rural, remote local educational agency in Panaca, Nevada, was allocated $865,416 in ARP ESSER funds and had expended 100 percent as of November 1, 2024. It states that the OIG reviewed 16 non-personnel expenditures covering $414,217 (91 percent) of $453,917 and determined that all were for allowable purposes and in accordance with applicable requirements. Because it identified no exceptions, the report makes no recommendations.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Issuer
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Inspector General
Document type
Report
Date
2025-03-31

Cite this document

“Lincoln County School District's Use of Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Funds (ED-OIG/F24NY0204).” U.S. Department of Education, Office of Inspector General, dated 2025-03-31. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/lincoln-county-school-district-esser/, SHA-256 79971e117cae56f49a01107a008620f4686ed697d8c154ea5fb75646c3d64548.

Full text

               U.S. Department of Education
               Office of Inspector General


Lincoln County School District’s
Use of Elementary and Secondary
School Emergency Relief Funds


March 31, 2025
ED-OIG/F24NY0204

FLASH REPORT
NOTICE
In accordance with Freedom of Information Act (Title 5, United States Code,
Section 552), reports that the Office of Inspector General issues are available to
members of the press and general public to the extent information they contain is not
subject to exemptions in the Act.
                         UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
                                        OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL

                                                                                                                     Audit Services



March 31, 2025


Jhone M. Ebert
Superintendent of Public Instruction
Nevada Department of Education
700 E. Fifth Street
Carson City, NV 89701



Dear Superintendent Ebert:



Enclosed is our final report, “Lincoln County School District’s Use of Elementary and Secondary School
Emergency Relief Funds,” Control Number ED-OIG/F24NY0204. The U.S. Department of Education’s
policy is to expedite audit resolution by timely acting on findings and recommendations. Therefore, if
you have any comments or information that you believe may have a bearing on the resolution of this
flash review, you should send them directly to the following Department of Education official, who will
consider them before taking final Departmental action on this flash review:

        Hayley Sanon
        Acting Assistant Secretary
        Office of Elementary and Secondary Education
        U.S. Department of Education
        400 Maryland Avenue, SW
        Washington, D.C. 20202

We appreciate your cooperation during this review. If you have any questions, please contact me at
(202) 987-0173 or Sean.Dawson@ed.gov.

Sincerely,

/s/

Sean Dawson
Assistant Inspector General for Audit


Enclosure




                               400 MARYLAND AVENUE, S.W., WASHINGTON, DC 20202-1510

               Promoting the efficiency, effectiveness, and integrity of the Department’s programs and operations.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Inspector General
Results in Brief
Lincoln County School District’s Use of Elementary and Secondary
School Emergency Relief Funds



Why the OIG Performed                      What Did the OIG Find?
This Work                                  We determined that all the ARP ESSER expenditures we reviewed for Lincoln were
Congress passed three coronavirus relief   allowable and in accordance with applicable requirements. An LEA could use ARP ESSER
acts within a 1-year period that           funds for a broad range of activities listed in any of the coronavirus relief acts and
provided more than $275 billion for an     identified in U.S. Department of Education guidance, including any activities authorized by
Education Stabilization Fund to prevent,   several Federal education laws.
prepare for, and respond to the
                                           We also found that Lincoln complied with key Federal procurement requirements,
coronavirus, which the President
                                           including those covering the procurement methods to be followed and contract cost,
declared as a national emergency in
                                           price, and provisions, when procuring the goods or services associated with each ARP
March 2020. This included $189.5 billion
                                           ESSER expenditure we reviewed.
for Elementary and Secondary School
Emergency Relief (ESSER), funds            What Are the Next Steps?
intended to provide vital support to       Because we identified no exceptions for the ARP ESSER expenditures that we reviewed,
States, local educational agencies, and    our report does not include recommendations.
schools to address the impact of the
                                           We provided a draft of this report to the Nevada Department of Education for comment.
coronavirus. Support, in part, includes
                                           Since the draft report did not include recommendations, written comments on our draft
activities designed to help students and
                                           report were not provided.
educators safely return to and sustain
in-person instruction, and that address
the educational inequities exacerbated
by the coronavirus pandemic and
students’ social, emotional, mental
health, and academic needs.
Ensuring that ESSER funds are used for
allowable purposes is critical to help
address the needs of students and
educators. The Lincoln County School
District (Lincoln) was allocated
approximately $865,000 in American
Rescue Plan (ARP) ESSER funds to
support 11 schools serving about
958 students.
We performed this review to determine
whether Lincoln expended ARP ESSER
grant funds for allowable purposes in
accordance with applicable
requirements.




                                              Final Flash Report                                          ED-OIG/F24NY0204
                Purpose
                The objective of this flash review was to determine whether the Lincoln County School
                District (Lincoln) expended American Rescue Plan (ARP) Elementary and Secondary
                School Emergency Relief (ESSER) 1 grant funds for allowable purposes in accordance
                with applicable requirements. This flash review report presents the results of our
                review.

                Lincoln County School District
                Lincoln is a rural, remote local educational agency (LEA), located in Panaca, Nevada,
                with 11 schools serving 958 students. Lincoln was allocated $865,416 in ARP ESSER
                funds and as of November 1, 2024, had expended 100 percent of its funds. According to
                Nevada’s Federal Relief Tracker, Lincoln budgeted 40 percent of funds for staff,
                50 percent for supplies, and 10 percent for services. 2 Lincoln’s ARP ESSER plan was to
                use its funds, in part, to continue district-wide social and emotional student-centered
                programs, professional development coaching for schools, student-centered instruction,
                professional development for teachers, modernization of curriculum and instruction
                materials, technology-integrated instruction and activities, and web-based curriculum
                for distance education students. Additionally, its funds were to be used on distance
                education technology (Chromebooks), student transportation, incentives to retain
                existing staff, recruitment incentives, and sanitation supplies for school facilities.




1
 ESSER is one of multiple emergency relief funds comprising the Education Stabilization Fund, which
was first authorized and funded under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act
(March 27, 2020), and for which Congress later provided additional funding under the Coronavirus
Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act (December 27, 2020) and the ARP
(March 11, 2021). Under ESSER, the U.S. Department of Education awarded grants to State educational
agencies for the purpose of providing local educational agencies with emergency relief funds to address
the impacts that the coronavirus pandemic had on elementary and secondary schools and their
students.
2
 This information is from the Nevada Department of Education’s Federal Relief Tracker, which is
updated periodically.


U.S. Department of Education
Office of Inspector General
ED-OIG/F24NY0204                                                                                        1
               Results of Our Review
               For the selected transactions covered by our review, Lincoln expended ARP ESSER grant
               funds for allowable purposes and in accordance with applicable requirements. We
               selected and reviewed 16 non-personnel ARP ESSER expenditures 3 (13 percent) from a
               total population of 120 ARP ESSER expenditures for our review period, from July
               1, 2022, through June 30, 2024. For these 16 non-personnel expenditures, we used a
               judgmental, risk-based process to select 6 and a non-statistical random sample process
               to select the other 10 expenditures. These expenditures represented $414,217
               (91 percent) of the total $453,917 in non-personnel ARP ESSER expenditures during our
               review period.

               We reviewed each expenditure to determine whether it was (1) connected to the
               coronavirus pandemic and intended to prevent, prepare for, or respond to the
               pandemic, including its impact on the social, emotional, mental health, and academic
               needs of students; (2) an authorized use of ARP ESSER funds under applicable law and
               regulations; and (3) reasonable and necessary and otherwise permissible under the
               Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for
               Federal Awards (2 Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.) part 200). We also performed
               additional work, as needed, to determine whether Lincoln complied with key Federal
               procurement requirements, specifically those covered under 2 C.F.R. sections 200.320
               (methods of procurement to be followed), 200.324 (contract cost and price), and
               200.327 (contract provisions), when procuring the goods or services associated with
               each expenditure. We interviewed Lincoln officials to gain a basic understanding of how
               they used ARP ESSER funds, and their processes for approving and monitoring ARP
               ESSER expenditures.

               An LEA could use ARP ESSER funds for a broad range of activities listed in any of the
               coronavirus relief acts and identified in U.S. Department of Education guidance,
               including any activities authorized by several Federal education laws.

               We determined that all 16 expenditures that we reviewed for Lincoln were used for
               allowable purposes and in accordance with applicable requirements. These
               expenditures were generally for sanitation products, student transportation, district
               reading materials, professional development coaching for teachers, and annual
               membership for professional development for teachers. Each expenditure was



3
 We limited the scope of our review to non-personnel expenditures; personnel expenditures were
excluded because Lincoln’s non-personnel expenditures represented 70 percent of the total
expenditures within our review period.


U.S. Department of Education
Office of Inspector General
ED-OIG/F24NY0204                                                                                       2
              connected to the coronavirus pandemic, an authorized use of ESSER funds under
              applicable law and regulations, and reasonable and necessary and otherwise permissible
              under 2 C.F.R. part 200. In addition, we found that Lincoln complied with key Federal
              procurement requirements covered under 2 C.F.R. sections 200.320 (methods of
              procurement to be followed), 200.324 (contract cost and price), and 200.327 (contract
              provisions) when procuring the goods or services associated with each expenditure.

              Because all the expenditures we reviewed were for allowable purposes and in
              accordance with applicable requirements, we make no recommendations in this report.

              Nevada Department of Education’s Comments
              The Nevada Department of Education did not provide written comments to this report
              because it did not include recommendations.




U.S. Department of Education
Office of Inspector General
ED-OIG/F24NY0204                                                                                   3
              Appendix A. Scope and Methodology
              Our review covered Lincoln’s ARP ESSER expenditures from July 1, 2022, through June
              30, 2024, our review period. We limited the scope of our review to ARP ESSER funds
              because Lincoln’s ARP ESSER funds represented the highest dollar amount ($865,416) of
              all ESSER funds ($1,353,805) that were allocated to them. We also limited our internal
              control work to gain a basic understanding of the process that Lincoln used to account
              for ARP ESSER funds, including the accounting system and accounting codes used by
              Lincoln. We conducted our review remotely from October 2024 through January 2025.
              We discussed the results of our review with Lincoln officials on January 14, 2025.

              Sampling Methodology
              To determine whether Lincoln expended ARP ESSER grant funds during our review
              period for allowable purposes in accordance with applicable requirements, we selected
              and reviewed 16 non-personnel expenditures (25 percent) from a total population of
              64 non-personnel expenditures using a combination of risk-based judgmental selection,
              and a non-statistical random sample process. The 16 expenditures represented
              $414,217 (91 percent) of the total $453,917 in non-personnel ARP ESSER expenditures
              during our review period. We selected 6 of these 16 expenditures using a risk-based
              judgmental process in which we considered one or a combination of the following
              criteria: high-dollar transaction, vague purchase description, or unique vendor
              description. We selected the other 10 expenditures using a non-statistical random
              sample process. Since the expenditures were selected using both a risk-based
              judgmental selection and a non-statistical random sample process, the results of our
              testing cannot be projected to the universe of ARP ESSER expenditures.

              Use of Computer-Processed Data
              We relied on computer-processed data from Lincoln’s accounting system, which
              included data from the LEA’s general ledger. Lincoln provided this information in a PDF
              document which we converted to a spreadsheet. To assess the completeness of the
              expenditure data in the spreadsheet, we compared total expenditures in the
              spreadsheet to the total expenditures in the monthly expenditure reports that Lincoln
              submitted to the Nevada Department of Education for our review period. To assess the
              reliability of the expenditure data in the spreadsheet, we reviewed supporting
              documentation, such as invoices and proof of payment, for our sample of
              16 expenditures. We did not identify any issues and concluded that the expenditure
              data in the spreadsheet were reliable for their intended use in this review.




U.S. Department of Education
Office of Inspector General
ED-OIG/F24NY0204                                                                                        4
              Compliance with Standards
              We conducted our work in accordance with the Office of Inspector General quality
              control standards and the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency
              “Quality Standards for Federal Offices of Inspector General,” which require that we
              conduct our work with integrity, objectivity, and independence. We believe that the
              information obtained provides a reasonable basis for our conclusions.




U.S. Department of Education
Office of Inspector General
ED-OIG/F24NY0204                                                                                        5
              Appendix B. Acronyms and Abbreviations
               ARP             American Rescue Plan

               C.F.R.          Code of Federal Regulations

               ESSER           Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief

               LEA             local educational agency

               Lincoln         Lincoln County School District




U.S. Department of Education
Office of Inspector General
ED-OIG/F24NY0204                                                                  6


File and source

File
lincoln-county-school-district-esser.pdf
Size
616,966 bytes
SHA-256
79971e117cae56f49a01107a008620f4686ed697d8c154ea5fb75646c3d64548
Our copy
lincoln-county-school-district-esser.pdf
Original
oig.ed.gov
Back to top