Judgment in a Criminal Case — United States v. Chazz White, Eastern District of Wisconsin (Dkt. 573)

Summary

An AO 245B judgment in a criminal case against Chazz White, Case Number 23-CR-77-28-JPS, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, filed September 27, 2024 as Document 573 in Case 2:23-cr-00077-JPS. White pled guilty to Count One, mail fraud conspiracy under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1349 and 2(a), and Count Thirty-Nine, being a felon in possession of a firearm, and Counts Twenty-Four, Twenty-Nine, Forty, and Forty-One are dismissed as to the defendant. U.S. District Judge J. P. Stadtmueller imposed a total of Sixty (60) months of imprisonment, concurrent with Milwaukee County Circuit Court sentences, and Three (3) years of supervised release. The judgment orders a $200.00 special assessment and restitution of $211,863.00: $77,892.00 to Arizona, $98,914.00 to California EDD and $35,057.00 to Wisconsin.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Judgment in a Criminal Case — United States v. Chazz White, Eastern District of Wisconsin (Dkt. 573).” Original at ecf.wied.uscourts.gov. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/judgment-usa-v-bowman-et-al-dkt-573-597030f77e/, SHA-256 a3f68df330e7e84d0e640918d548a5de56c5c5f98c760d96492b2a393278b1d5.

Full text

AO 245B (Rev.06/05) Sheet 1 – Judgment in a Criminal Case

United States District Court
Eastern District of Wisconsin

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
JUDGMENT IN A CRIMINAL CASE
V. Case Number: 23-CR-77-28-JPS
Marshal Number: 60925-510
CHAZZ WHITE

Eric Maciolek Laura Kwaterski
Defendant’s Attorney Assistant United States Attorney

THE DEFENDANT:
Pled guilty to Counts One and Thirty-Nine of the Indictment.

Title & Section Nature of Offense Date Concluded Count

18 U.S.C. §§ 1349 and
Mail Fraud Conspiracy February 2022 One
2(a)

Being a Felon in
18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1)
Possession of a December 19, 2022 Thirty-Nine
and 924(a)(8)
Firearm

The defendant is sentenced as provided in sheets 2 through 6 of this judgment. The sentence is
imposed pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984.

IT IS ORDERED that Counts Twenty-Four, Twenty-Nine, Forty, and Forty-One of the
Indictment be and the same are hereby DISMISSED as to the defendant.

IT IS ORDERED that the defendant shall notify the United States Attorney for this district within
30 days of any change of name, residence, or mailing address until all fines, restitution, costs, and
special assessments imposed by this judgment are fully paid.

Case 2:23-cr-00077-JPS Filed 09/27/24 Page 1 of 8 Document 573
AO 245B (Rev.06/05) Sheet 1 – Judgment in a Criminal Case

Date Sentence Imposed: September 27, 2024

______________________________

J. P. Stadtmueller
U.S. District Judge

Date Judgment Signed: September 27, 2024

Case 2:23-cr-00077-JPS Filed 09/27/24 Page 2 of 8 Document 573
AO 245B (Rev.06/05) Sheet 2 – Imprisonment Judgment Page 3 of 8
Defendant: Chazz White
Case Number: 23-CR-77-28

IMPRISONMENT

The defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for
a term of Sixty (60) months as to Count One of the Indictment and a term of Sixty (60) months as to
Count Thirty-Nine of the Indictment, to operate to run concurrently with one another for a total term
of imprisonment of Sixty (60) months, which is to operate to run concurrently with the balance of the
sentences the defendant is serving in Milwaukee County Circuit Court Case Nos. 16CF986 and
19CF646.

The Court makes the following recommendations to the Bureau of Prisons:

(1) that the defendant be considered for incarceration at a federal facility most near to
the state of Texas; and

(2) that the defendant be evaluated for inclusion in the Bureau of Prisons 500-hour
comprehensive drug treatment program.

The defendant is remanded to the custody of the U.S. Marshal.

RETURN

I have executed this judgment as follows:

Defendant delivered on _____________ to ______________ at ______________, with a certified
copy of this judgment.

____________________
United States Marshal

By: ____________________
Deputy U.S. Marshal

Case 2:23-cr-00077-JPS Filed 09/27/24 Page 3 of 8 Document 573
AO 245B (Rev.06/05) Sheet 3 – Supervised Release Judgment Page 4 of 8
Defendant: Chazz White
Case Number: 23-CR-77-28

SUPERVISED RELEASE

Upon release from imprisonment, the defendant shall be on supervised release for a term of
Three (3) years as to Count One of the Indictment and Three (3) years as to Count Thirty-Nine of the
Indictment, to operate to run concurrently with one another for a total term of supervised release of
Three (3) years. The defendant shall comply with the following special conditions:

1. Within 72 hours of release from the custody of the Bureau of Prisons, the defendant shall report
in person to his supervising probation officer in the district to which the defendant has been
released.
2. The defendant shall not commit another federal, state, or local crime.
3. The defendant shall not possess any firearms or other dangerous weapons.
4. Pursuant to the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1996, the defendant shall
not illegally possess or unlawfully use any controlled substance.
5. The defendant is to participate in a program of testing to include not more than six urinalysis
screens per month together with residential or outpatient treatment for drug and/or alcohol
abuse, as approved by his supervising probation officer, until such time as he is released from
such program. The defendant shall pay the cost of this program under the direction of his
supervising probation officer. The defendant is to refrain from the excessive use of alcohol,
defined as having a blood alcohol concentration of greater than .08, throughout the supervised
release term.
6. The defendant must reside at a residence approved by his supervising probation officer.
7. The defendant shall use his best efforts to secure lawful full-time employment and support his
dependents.
8. The defendant shall notify his supervising probation officer at least ten days prior to any change
in the place of his residence or employment. When such notification is not possible, the
defendant shall notify his supervising probation officer within 72 hours of the change.
9. The defendant shall notify his supervising probation officer within 72 hours of being arrested or
questioned by a law enforcement officer.
10. The defendant shall follow the reasonable instructions of his supervising probation officer and
answer all inquiries of such officer subject to the defendant’s Fifth Amendment right against
self-incrimination.
11. The defendant shall permit his supervising probation officer to visit him at reasonable times at
home, or such other location as may be mutually agreed upon and shall permit confiscation of
any contraband observed in plain view by his supervising probation officer.
12. The defendant shall not associate with any persons known by him to be engaged or planning to
be engaged in criminal activity. “Associate” as used here means to communicate, meet, reside,
socialize, or otherwise interact with such person.
13. The defendant shall not knowingly leave the judicial district to which he has been released
without the permission of the Court or his supervising probation officer.
Case 2:23-cr-00077-JPS Filed 09/27/24 Page 4 of 8 Document 573
AO 245B (Rev.06/05) Sheet 3 – Supervised Release Judgment Page 5 of 8
Defendant: Chazz White
Case Number: 23-CR-77-28
14. The defendant shall not enter into any agreement to act as an informer or special agent of a law
enforcement agency without the prior approval of the Court.
15. The defendant is to pay the restitution that the Court has ordered at a rate of not less than $100.00
per month. Any interest on the restitution is waived. The defendant will also apply 100 percent
of any annual federal and/or state tax refund(s) toward the payment of any restitution balance.
The defendant shall not change exemptions claimed for either federal or state income tax
purposes without prior notice to his supervising probation officer.
16. The defendant shall not open any new lines of credit, which includes the leasing of any vehicle
or property, or use existing credit resources without the prior approval of his supervising
probation officer. After the defendant’s Court-ordered financial obligations have been fully
satisfied, this condition will no longer remain in effect.
17. The defendant is to provide access to all financial information requested by his supervising
probation officer including, but not limited to, copies of all federal and state income tax returns.
All tax returns shall be filed in a timely manner. The defendant shall also submit monthly
financial reports to his supervising probation officer.

In accordance with the recent decisions by the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh

Circuit in United States v. Siegel, 753 F.3d 705 (7th Cir. 2014), United States v. Thompson, 777 F.3d 368

(7th Cir. 2015), United States v. Kappes, 782 F.3d 828 (7th Cir. 2015), United States v. Downs, 784 F.3d

1180 (7th Cir. 2015), United States v. Poulin, 809 F.3d 924 (7th Cir. 2016), United States v. Ortiz, 817

F.3d 1180 (7th Cir. 2016), United States v. Hill, 818 F.3d 342 (7th Cir. 2016), and their progeny, the

Court withheld imposition of any additional conditions of supervised release. The Court concluded

that such additional conditions, if any, are best left for further consideration at such time as the

defendant may become eligible for release from the custodial portion of the Court’s sentence.

Case 2:23-cr-00077-JPS Filed 09/27/24 Page 5 of 8 Document 573
AO 245B (Rev.06/05) Sheet 5 – Criminal Monetary Penalties Judgment Page 6 of 8
Defendant:
Case Number:

CRIMINAL MONETARY PENALTIES

The defendant shall pay the following total criminal monetary penalties in accordance with the
schedule of payments set forth on Sheet 6.

Special Assessment Fine Restitution

Totals: $200.00 Waived $211,863.00

FINE

Based upon the defendant’s limited financial resources, the Court determines that the defendant
does not have the financial ability to pay a fine within the guidelines range. The Court determines that
the defendant does not have the financial ability to pay the interest on the fine, costs of incarceration,
costs of community confinement, and supervision, and therefore waives the interest on the fine, costs
of incarceration, costs of community confinement, and supervision in this case.

A waiver of the cost of community confinement does not preclude the Bureau of Prisons from
imposing a subsistence fee of up to twenty-five percent (25%) of gross income, based on ability to pay,
for any portion of the sentence spent in a community correctional facility.

RESTITUTION

The defendant shall pay restitution in the amount listed below. Interest on the restitution is
waived. Restitution payments shall be made to the Clerk of the Court—362 U.S. Courthouse, 517 E.
Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202—who shall disburse restitution payments to the
following payees:

PAYEE AMOUNT
Arizona
(Make check payable to: Arizona Department of
Economic Security)
Arizona Department of Economic Security $77,892.00
Office of Inspector General/ Attention D.
Hawkins
2200 N. Central Ave., Ste 301 Mail Drop 1747
Phoenix, AZ 85004
(continued on next page)

Case 2:23-cr-00077-JPS Filed 09/27/24 Page 6 of 8 Document 573
AO 245B (Rev.06/05) Sheet 5 – Criminal Monetary Penalties Judgment Page 7 of 8
Defendant:
Case Number:
California
EDD Legal, MIC 53 $98,914.00
Attn: FREDD
P.O. Box 826880
Sacramento, CA 94280-0001
Wisconsin
Make checks payable to “Unemployment
Insurance” $35,057.00
DWD-UI
PO Box 7888
Madison, WI 53707-7888

Case 2:23-cr-00077-JPS Filed 09/27/24 Page 7 of 8 Document 573
AO 245B (Rev.06/05) Sheet 6 – Schedule of Payments Judgment Page 8 of 8
Defendant: Chazz White
Case Number: 23-CR-77-28

SCHEDULE OF PAYMENTS

Payments shall be applied in the following order: (1) assessment, and (2) restitution.

Special instructions regarding the payment of criminal monetary penalties:

The Court considers the defendant’s participation in the Federal Bureau of Prisons Inmate
Financial Responsibility Program to be a necessary component of the repayment of the court-imposed
financial obligations. Payments are to apply first to the special assessment and then to the restitution
ordered by the Court until paid in full.

Unless the Court has expressly ordered otherwise in the special instructions above, if this
judgment imposes a period of imprisonment, payment of the criminal monetary penalties shall be due
during the period of imprisonment. All criminal monetary penalty payments, except those payments
made through the Bureau of Prisons Inmate Financial Responsibility Program are to be made as
directed by the Court, the defendant’s supervising probation officer, or the United States Attorney.

Case 2:23-cr-00077-JPS Filed 09/27/24 Page 8 of 8 Document 573

File and source

File: 573-judgment-as-to-chazz-white.pdf
Size: 149,365 bytes
SHA-256: a3f68df330e7e84d0e640918d548a5de56c5c5f98c760d96492b2a393278b1d5
Our copy: 573-judgment-as-to-chazz-white.pdf
Original: PACER (login required)