Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Judgment of Dismissal — Wade Riner v. Recreation Centers of Sun City West Incorporated, D. Ariz. (Document 20)Search ⌕

Judgment of Dismissal — Wade Riner v. Recreation Centers of Sun City West Incorporated, D. Ariz. (Document 20)

Summary

A one-page Judgment of Dismissal in a Civil Case filed January 30, 2025 as Document 20 in Wade Riner v. Recreation Centers of Sun City West Incorporated, et al., NO. CV-22-01421-PHX-ROS (Case 2:22-cv-01421-ROS), in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona. It states that, pursuant to the parties' Stipulation of Dismissal, the case is dismissed with prejudice. It also states that the Court shall retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing the Settlement Agreement. The form is dated January 30, 2025 and carries the signature s/ K. James, Deputy Clerk, for Debra D. Lucas, District Court Executive/Clerk of Court.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Judgment of Dismissal — Wade Riner v. Recreation Centers of Sun City West Incorporated, D. Ariz. (Document 20).” Original at archive.org. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/judgment-of-dismissal-no-2-22-cv-01421-dkt-20-d-ariz-59394ca9d8/, SHA-256 e5ee32428a0f188fbfe4aafa7c3e83c37a6765e5e6f319c5a9e2c3ace3e2e5a7.

Full text

     Case 2:22-cv-01421-ROS        Document 20       Filed 01/30/25    Page 1 of 1



 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6                       IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
 7                              FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
 8
 9   Wade Riner,                                       NO. CV-22-01421-PHX-ROS
10                 Plaintiff,
                                                     JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL IN A
11   v.
                                                     CIVIL CASE
12   Recreation Centers of Sun City West
     Incorporated, et al.,
13
                   Defendants.
14
15          Decision by Court. This action came for consideration before the Court. The
16   issues have been considered and a decision has been rendered.

17          IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, pursuant to the parties’ Stipulation of
18   Dismissal, this case is dismissed with prejudice. The Court shall retain jurisdiction for the

19   purposes of enforcing the Settlement Agreement.

20                                             Debra D. Lucas
                                               District Court Executive/Clerk of Court
21
22   January 30, 2025
                                               s/ K. James
23                                       By    Deputy Clerk
24
25
26
27
28

File and source

File
20-judgment-of-dismissal.pdf
Size
74,226 bytes
SHA-256
e5ee32428a0f188fbfe4aafa7c3e83c37a6765e5e6f319c5a9e2c3ace3e2e5a7
Our copy
20-judgment-of-dismissal.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top