Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Judgment and Commitment Order on Revocation — USA v. Scoggins et al (Dkt. 103)Search ⌕

Judgment and Commitment Order on Revocation — USA v. Scoggins et al (Dkt. 103)

Summary

A judgment and commitment order on revocation of supervised release in United States v. John David Scoggins, No. 5:23-cr-00087-MHH-HNJ, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, filed August 1, 2025 as Document 103 and signed that day by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala. It recounts the April 30, 2024 sentence of 60 months of probation, a June 7, 2024 revocation hearing, the probation revocation of August 22, 2024 and the further revocation on March 7, 2025 with 36 months of supervised release. Finding that the defendant violated supervised release, the court, as pronounced on July 31, 2025, imposes three (3) months in custody with credit for time served on the current warrant, followed by 24 months of supervised release. A new condition keeps the defendant in custody until an in-patient treatment bed is secured and requires completion of all treatment phases.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Judgment and Commitment Order on Revocation — USA v. Scoggins et al (Dkt. 103).” Original at ecf.alnd.uscourts.gov. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/judgment-and-commitment-order-on-revocation-usa-v-scoggins-et-al-dkt-1-0e72ea81c0/, SHA-256 a15b45eff304b39ccf90e1703038155e1c2cc18dfe95b7ab53f862c1fa5251b7.

Full text

              Case 5:23-cr-00087-MHH-HNJ                  Document 103       Filed 08/01/25   Page 1 of 1         FILED
                                                                                                         2025 Aug-01 PM 03:36
AO 245 S (Rev. 1/98)(N.D.Ala. rev.) Sheet 1 - Judgment in a Criminal Case                                U.S. DISTRICT COURT
                                                                                                             N.D. OF ALABAMA


                                UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                                    Northern District of Alabama
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

         v.                                                           Case Number 5:23-CR-87-MHH-HNJ-2

JOHN DAVID SCOGGINS
    Defendant.


                                 JUDGMENT AND COMMITMENT ORDER
                               ON REVOCATION OF SUPERVISED RELEASE
                              (For Offenses Committed On or After November 1, 1987)

        The defendant, JOHN DAVID SCOGGINS, was represented by Jerry S. Barclay.

        Mr. Scoggins was sentenced on April 30, 2024 and was placed on probation for a period of 60 months.
Mr. Scoggins had a revocation hearing on June 7, 2024, and a special condition was added to his Probation. Mr.
Scoggins’s probation was revoked on August 22, 2024, and he was sentenced to time served and transferred to
an in-patient program. On March 7, 2025, his probation was revoked again, and he was sentenced to time served
and a supervised release term of 36 months.
        Mr. Scoggins has violated the terms and conditions of his supervised release. The Court revokes his
supervised release. As pronounced on July 31, 2025, Mr. Scoggins is committed to the custody of the United
States Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of three (3) months, with credit for time served in custody
on the current warrant, and 24 months of supervised release to follow. The Court adds the following special
condition:
        1) The defendant shall remain in custody after completion of the custodial sentence until a bed space at
an in-patient treatment facility is secured. A separate Order for Release will be issued upon securing a bed space
that is mutually approved by the U.S. Probation Office and the attorney of record. Upon release, the defendant
is to report directly to the in-patient treatment facility. Transportation must be approved in advance by the U.S.
Probation Office. The defendant must attend and complete all phases of treatment recommended by the treatment
provider. All passes must be approved by the U.S. Probation Office.


        The defendant is remanded to the custody of the United States Marshal.

        Signed this the 1st day of August, 2025.




                                                     MADELINE HUGHES HAIKALA
                                                     U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

File and source

File
103-judgment-and-commitment-order-on-revocation.pdf
Size
110,687 bytes
SHA-256
a15b45eff304b39ccf90e1703038155e1c2cc18dfe95b7ab53f862c1fa5251b7
Our copy
103-judgment-and-commitment-order-on-revocation.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top