Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Information — United States v. Dana Adkins, Eastern District of Tennessee (Document 1)Search ⌕

Information — United States v. Dana Adkins, Eastern District of Tennessee (Document 1)

Summary

Information filed May 17, 2023 as Document 1 in United States of America v. Dana Adkins, also known as "Dana Morris," Case 1:23-cr-00043-CEA-MJD, Eastern District of Tennessee at Chattanooga. Count One charges mail fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1341, alleging that beginning in or about June 2020 and continuing until in or about January 2021 the defendant, aided and abetted by others, devised a scheme to defraud the government of the United States and various states by making false unemployment insurance claims, including to the Pennsylvania Department of Labor and Industry. It alleges that approximately $150,804 in debit cards were distributed to parties not entitled to receive the claims, and describes a July 6, 2020 mailing of an unemployment insurance debit card of $4,149.00. The information includes forfeiture allegations seeking a money judgment of $150,804.00.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Information — United States v. Dana Adkins, Eastern District of Tennessee (Document 1).” Original at ecf.tned.uscourts.gov. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/information-usa-v-adkins-dkt-1-3d28316499/, SHA-256 ee43935db466c3babd8045a00780d96c05c403a4c7bd2f3bdd4db871f89f2f4f.

Full text

                            UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                           MAY 1 7 2023
                           EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
                                                                             Clerk, U.S. District Court
                                  AT CHATTANOOGA                           Eastern District of Tennessee
                                                                                 At Chattanooga
 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA                             )
                                                      )
 v.                                                   )
                                                      )
 DANA ADKINS;                                         )
 Also known as, "Dana Morris"                         )

                                         INFORMATION

                                         COUNT ONE
                                         MAIL FRAUD
                                       (18 u.s.c. § 1341)

 THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY CHARGES THAT:

 AT ALL TIMES MATERIAL HEREIN:

        1. The defendant, DANA ADKINS, at all times relevant to the dates in the

 Information, was a resident of Stevenson, Alabama.

        2. Facts relating to COVID-19:

           a. In December 2019, a novel coronavirus, SARS-Co V-2 (the "coronavirus"), was

first detected in Wuhan, Hubei Province of the People's Republic of China ("PRC"), causing

outbreaks of the coronavirus disease COVID-19 that have since spread globally. On January

31, 2020, the Secretary of Health and Human Services ("HHS") declared a national public health

emergency under 42 U.S.C. § 247d as a result of the spread of COVID-19 to and within the

United States. On March 11, 2020, the Director-General of the World Health Organization

("WHO") characterized COVID-19 as a pandemic. On March 13, 2020, the President of the

United States issued Proclamation 9994 declaring a national emergency beginning on March 1,


                                                                                   Page 1 of 8




Case 1:23-cr-00043-CEA-MJD         Document 1         Filed 05/17/23   Page 1 of 8     PageID
                                         #: 1
  2020, as a result of the rapid spread of COVID-19 within the United States.

             b. Unemployment Insurance System: The Social Security Act of 1935 initiated the

  unemployment insurance ("UI") system. · Ul payments were intended to provide temporary

  financial assistance to lawful workers who were unemployed through no fault of their own.

  Beginning in or around March 2020, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, several federal

  programs expanded UI eligibility and increased UI benefits. The UI system is administered for

  the federal government by the state employment offices, and each state administrates a separate

  unemployment benefits program under guidelines established by federal law.

                 1) In the State of Tennessee, the agency responsible for overseeing the

                    disbursement of unemployment insurance is the Tennessee Department of

                    Labor and Workforce Development ("TNL WD") which administers the

                    unemployment benefits system on behalf of the federal government,

                    specifically the United States Department of Labor ("DOL"). The DOL

                    funds all substantive and administrative costs for the TNL WD.

                2) In order to qualify for unemployment insurance, an applicant must complete

                    an online application on TNLWD's website with the applicant's name, date of

                    birth, social security number, and other personal information. The applicant

                    can then file for weekly benefits by ce1tifying online that he/she is

                    unemployed and eligible for benefits.

                3) Other states, such as Pennsylvania and California, likewise provide

                   unemployment insurance to their citizens in a similar fashion. In the State of

                   Pennsylvania, the agency responsible for program oversight is the


                                                                                        Page 2 of 8




Case 1:23-cr-00043-CEA-MJD            Document 1        Filed 05/17/23       Page 2 of 8     PageID
                                            #: 2
                     Pennsylvania Department of Labor and Industry, (PADOL). In the State of

                     California, the agency responsible for program oversight is the California

                    Employment Development Department (CAEDD).

             c. Federal Cares Act: On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and

  Economic Security (CARES) Act was passed by Congress and signed into law by President

  Donald J. Trump. The CARES Act included an economic relief package in excess of $2 trillion

  designed to help the American people during the public health and economic crises related to the

  pending coronavirus ("COVID-19") pandemic. The CARES Act provides for three new types

  of unemployment benefits:

                 I) The Pandemic Unemployment Assistance ("PUA") program is a separate

                    benefit program designed to cover many people who do not qualify for regular

                    unemployment during the COVID-19 pandemic. This includes self-employed

                    individuals, independent contractors, and part-time workers affected by

                    COVID-19.

                2) The Pandemic Emergency Unemployment Compensation ("PEUC") program

                    is an extension of regular unemployment benefits that offers unemployment

                    benefits up to thirteen (13) weeks beyond the number of weeks available from

                    regular unemployment. The CARES Act made these PEUC benefits

                   available to the unemployed between March 29, 2020, and December 26,

                   2020.

                3) The Federal Pandemic Unemployment Compensation ("FPUC") program

                   provides an extra $600 per week in addition to regular or PUA unemployment


                                                                                      Page 3 of 8




Case 1:23-cr-00043-CEA-MJD           Document 1        Filed 05/17/23      Page 3 of 8        PageID
                                           #: 3
                     payments between March 29, 2020 and July 25, 2020. The FPUC is available

                     for everyone on regular unemployment or PUA, except those on training

                     benefits.

              d. In the State of Pennsylvania, the PADOL, based in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania,

  administered the UI program. Those seeking UI benefits submitted online applications.

  Applicants had to answer specific questions to establish eligibility to receive UI benefits,

  including their name, Social Security Number (SSN), and mailing address, among other things.

  Applicants also had to self-certify that they met a COVID-19-related reason for being

  unemployed, partially employed, or unable to work. The PADOL relied upon the information in

  the application to determine UI benefits eligibility. Once an application was approved, the

  PADOL typically distributed state and federal UI benefits electronically to a debit card, which

  claimants could use to withdraw funds and/or make purchases. These debit cards were sent via

 the U.S. Postal Service or by a private and commercial interstate carrier to the address the

 claimant provided. Claimants could activate their debit card via telephone or online.

 THE SCHEME TO DEFRAUD:

         3. Beginning in or about June 2020, and continuing until in or about January 2021, in

 the Eastern District of Tennessee and elsewhere, the defendant, DANA ADKINS, aided and

 abetted by others, devised and intended to devise a scheme and a1iifice to defraud the

 government of the United States, governments of various states, and others, and to obtain money

 and property by means of false and fraudulent pretenses, representations and promises. The

 scheme and aiiifice to defraud and to obtain money so devised and intended to be devised by the

 defendant was in substance as follows:


                                                                                        Page 4 of 8




Case 1:23-cr-00043-CEA-MJD            Document 1         Filed 05/17/23      Page 4 of 8         PageID
                                            #: 4
          4. It was part of the scheme to defraud that beginning in or about June 2020, the

  defendant, DANA ADKINS, coordinated with others who had knowledge about making false

  submissions to various states' UI programs and worked with them to create a system to make

  mass false UI claims to those states.

          5. It was further part of the scheme to defraud that between in or about June 2020, and

  January 2021, the defendant, DANA ADKINS, obtained the personal information of other

  individuals with which to make false UI claims in various states. The defendant obtained the

  permission of these individuals to file false claims using their infonnation.

         6. It was further part of the scheme to defraud that beginning in or about June 2020, the

  defendant, DANA ADKINS, aided and abetted by others, utilized a personal computer located in

  Alabama to submit false UI claims in various names to the state of Pennsylvania.

         7.   It was further part of the scheme to defraud that the defendant, DANA ADKINS,

 worked with others to assist with the submission of false claims and referred false claimants to

 one another. The defendant and R.A. worked together to submit false UI claims to the state of

 Pennsylvania.

         8.   It was further part of the scheme to defraud that between in or about June 2020,

 and January 2021, the defendant, DANA ADKINS, utilized a personal cellphone and

 computer to submit false UI claims in various names to the state of Pennsylvania and

 caused the PADOL to mail debit cards to the Eastern District of Tennessee.

         9.   It was further part of the scheme to defraud that between in or about June

 2020 and January 2021 the defendant, DANA ADKINS, submitted false UI claims to

 various states and caused to be distribu'ted approximately $150,804 in debit cards to parties


                                                                                      Page 5 of 8




Case 1:23-cr-00043-CEA-MJD             Document 1        Filed 05/17/23       Page 5 of 8     PageID
                                             #: 5
  who were not entitled to receive the claims.

  THE EXECUTION:

          Beginning in or about June 2020, and continuing until in or about January 2021, in

  the Eastern District of Tennessee and elsewhere, the defendant, DANA ADKINS, with the intent

  to defraud, devised and willfully pmticipated in, with knowledge of its fraudulent nature, the

  above-described scheme and artifice to defraud and obtained money and property by materially

  false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises,

          On or about July 6, 2020, in the Eastern District of Tennessee and elsewhere, for the

  purpose of executing the above-described scheme and artifice to defraud, the defendant, DANA

  ADKINS, knowingly caused to be delivered by mail and by private and commercial interstate

  carrier to the place in the Eastern District of Tennessee at which the defendant directed it to be

  delivered in connection with the following transaction:

   COUNT            DATE                 AMOUNT               DESCRIPTION           CONTENT OF

                                                              OF MAIL               MAIL

   1                On or about July     $4,149.00            Mailing initiated     Unemployment
                    6,2020                                    by PADOL              Insurance Claim
                                                              through defendant     Debit Card
                                                              Adkins sent to the
                                                              Eastern District of
                                                              Tennessee in the
                                                              name of KG.


 The violation occurred in relation to and involving a benefit authorized, transported, transmitted,

 transferred, disbursed, and paid in connection with a presidentially declared major disaster and

 emergency. All in violation of Title 18 United States Code, Sections 1341 and 2.



                                                                                         Page 6 of 8




Case 1:23-cr-00043-CEA-MJD             Document 1        Filed 05/17/23       Page 6 of 8       PageID
                                             #: 6
                                    FORFEITURE ALLEGATIONS

          1.       The allegations contained in Count One of this Information are hereby realleged

  and incorporated by reference for the purpose of alleging forfeiture pursuant to Title 18, United

  States Code, Sections 98l(a)(l)(C) and Title 28, United States Code, Section 246l(c).

          2.       Pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 98l(a)(I)(C) and Title 28,

  United States Code, Section 2461 (c), upon conviction of an offense in violation of Title 18,

  United States Code, Section 1341, the defendant, DANA ADKINS, shall forfeit to the United

  States of America, any property, real or personal, which constitutes or is derived from proceeds

  traceable to the offense. The properties to be forfeited include, but are not limited to, the

  following:

               a. A personal money judgment in the amount of $150,804.00 in favor of the United
                  States and against the defendant, DANA ADKINS, which represents the proceeds
                  the defendant personally obtained as a result of an offense in violation of Title 18,
                  United States Code, Section 1341.

         3.       Pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p), the defendant DANA

 ADKINS, shall forfeit substitute property, up to the value of the property subject to forfeiture, if

 by any act or omission of any of the defendants, said property, or any portion thereof:

                  a.      cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence;

                  b.      has been transferred, sold to, or deposited with a third party;

                  c.      has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the Court;

                  d.      has been substantially diminished in value; or

                  e.     has been commingled with other property that cannot be divided
                         without difficulty;

 the United States of America shall be entitled to forfeiture of substitute property pursuant


                                                                                            Page 7 of 8




Case 1:23-cr-00043-CEA-MJD              Document 1         Filed 05/17/23       Page 7 of 8       PageID
                                              #: 7
 to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p), as incorporated by Title 18, United States

 Code, Section 982(b)(1 ).


                                                      FRANCIS M. HAMILTON III
                                                      United States Attorney

                                                  By Steven S. Neff
                                                    Steven S. Neff, BPR# GA 537187
                                                    Assistant United States Attorney
                                                    1110 Market Street, Suite 515
                                                    Chattanooga, TN 37402
                                                    Steven.Neff@usdoj.gov
                                                    (423) 752-5140




                                                                                     Page 8 of 8




Case 1:23-cr-00043-CEA-MJD           Document 1        Filed 05/17/23      Page 8 of 8         PageID
                                           #: 8


File and source

File
1-information-as-to-dana-adkins.pdf
Size
301,798 bytes
SHA-256
ee43935db466c3babd8045a00780d96c05c403a4c7bd2f3bdd4db871f89f2f4f
Our copy
1-information-as-to-dana-adkins.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top