Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Information — United States of America v. Daniel Dadoun

Information — United States of America v. Daniel Dadoun

Summary

An Information in United States v. Daniel Dadoun in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, filed after he waived prosecution by indictment and charging bank fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1344 and a monetary transaction count under 18 U.S.C. § 1957. It describes Dadoun as a resident of Israel who controlled New Jersey businesses including DG Distiservices, Seldat Distribution, Seldat Staffing and Seldat Fashion. The Information alleges that he signed a PPP loan application for Seldat Distribution of approximately $2,125,000 that misstated its employees and payroll, that Victim-Lender 1 disbursed the full amount, and that he moved it the next day to the Seldat Fashion account. It states that he obtained a total of approximately $3,239,774.43 in PPP loan proceeds.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Captured
2026-09-25
Source site
www-justice-gov

Archived web capture. Preserved source — captured from www-justice-gov; archived 2026-09-25.

Full text

2018R00986/KMR




                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                                DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA                      :     Hon.
                                               :
         v.                                    :     Crim. No.
                                               :
 DANIEL DADOUN                                 :     18 U.S.C. § 1344
                                               :     18 U.S.C. § 1957

                                   INFORMATION

        The defendant having waived in open court prosecution by Indictment, the

United States Attorney for the District of New Jersey charges:

                                       COUNT ONE
                                       (Bank Fraud)

        1.       At all times relevant to this Information:

                 a.      Defendant DANIEL DADOUN (“defendant DADOUN”) resided

in Israel and elsewhere.

                 b.      Defendant DADOUN owned and controlled several businesses

located in New Jersey, including:

                        i.     DG Distiservices, LLC (“DG Distiservices”), a business

with operations in Perth Amboy, New Jersey and elsewhere that provided staffing

services;

                       ii.     Seldat Distribution, Inc. (“Seldat Distribution”), a

business located in South Plainfield, New Jersey and elsewhere that provided

warehousing and third-party logistics services;

                      iii.     Seldat Staffing, LLC (“Seldat Staffing”), a business

purportedly located in South Plainfield, New Jersey; and
                  iv.      Seldat Fashion LLC (“Seldat Fashion”), a business

purportedly located in South Plainfield, New Jersey.

             c.     Victim-Lender 1, Victim-Lender 2, and Victim-Lender 3

(together, the “Victim Lenders”) were each federally insured financial institutions

as defined in Title 18, United States Code, Section 20, that served as third-party

participating lenders in the Paycheck Protection Program described below.

             d.     Victim-Lender 1 was headquartered in New Jersey, and

defendant DADOUN controlled several bank accounts at Victim-Lender 1, including

a checking account associated with Seldat Distribution (the “Seldat Distribution

Bank Account”), and a checking account associated with Seldat Fashion (the “Seldat

Fashion Bank Account”).

                        The Paycheck Protection Program

             e.     The Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) was a COVID-19

pandemic relief program administered by the Small Business Administration

(“SBA”) that provided forgivable loans to small businesses for job retention and

certain other expenses. The PPP permitted participating third-party lenders to

approve and disburse SBA-backed PPP loans to cover payroll, fixed debts, utilities,

rent/mortgage, accounts payable, and other bills incurred by qualifying businesses

during, and resulting from, the COVID-19 pandemic. PPP loans were fully

guaranteed by the SBA.

             f.     To obtain a PPP loan, a qualifying business had to submit a PPP

loan application, which was signed by an authorized representative of the business.

The PPP loan application required the business (through its authorized

                                          2
representative) to acknowledge the program rules and make certain affirmative

certifications to be eligible to obtain the PPP loan, including that the business was

in operation and either had employees for whom it paid salaries and payroll taxes or

paid independent contractors. A business applying for a PPP loan was required to

provide documentation showing its payroll expenses, such as filed federal income

tax documents.

             g.     PPP loan applications were electronically submitted or caused to

be submitted by the borrower and received through SBA servers. Once approved,

the business received the PPP loan proceeds via an electronic funds transfer from

the third-party lender to a financial account under the control of the business.

             h.     The proceeds of a PPP loan could be used for certain specified

items, such as payroll costs, costs related to the continuation of group health care

benefits, or mortgage interest payments. The proceeds of a PPP loan were not

permitted to be used by the borrowers to purchase consumer goods, automobiles,

personal residences, clothing, jewelry, to pay the borrower’s personal federal income

taxes, or to fund the borrower’s ordinary day-to-day living expenses unrelated to the

specified authorized expenses.

                             The Scheme to Defraud

      2.     From in or around April 2020 through in or around August 2022, in

the District of New Jersey, and elsewhere, the defendant,

                                 DANIEL DADOUN,

knowingly and intentionally participated in a scheme and artifice to defraud a

financial institution, namely Victim-Lender 1, and to obtain money, funds, credits,

                                          3
assets, securities, and other property owned by, and under the control of, Victim-

Lender 1, by means of materially false and fraudulent pretenses, representations,

and promises, as set forth below.

                          Goal of the Scheme to Defraud

      3.      The goal of the scheme to defraud was for defendant DADOUN to

enrich himself by fraudulently obtaining federal COVID-19 emergency relief funds

from the Victim Lenders that were meant for distressed small businesses by

submitting or causing the submission of fraudulent PPP loan and loan forgiveness

applications to the Victim Lenders.

                   Manner and Means of the Scheme to Defraud

      4.      It was part of the scheme to defraud that:

              a.     On or about April 13, 2020, defendant DADOUN submitted and

caused to be submitted a loan application to Victim-Lender 1 seeking a PPP loan of

approximately $2,125,000 on behalf of Seldat Distribution (the “Seldat Distribution

PPP Loan”).

              b.     The loan application, which defendant DADOUN signed, falsely

represented Seldat Distribution’s number of employees and average monthly

payroll at the time of the application.

              c.     As part of the loan application, defendant DADOUN also

submitted a fraudulent IRS Form 941 Employer’s Quarterly Federal Tax Return

document to Victim-Lender 1, which was never in fact filed with the IRS.

              d.     In reliance on the representations made in the loan application,

Victim-Lender 1 disbursed approximately $2,125,000—the full amount defendant

                                           4
DADOUN applied for—to the Seldat Distribution Bank Account. The following day,

defendant DADOUN transferred approximately $2,125,000 to the Seldat Fashion

Bank Account.

             e.    On or about September 1, 2021, defendant DADOUN submitted

to Victim-Lender 1 an application for forgiveness of the Seldat Distribution PPP

Loan. The application falsely represented Seldat Distribution’s number of

employees as of the time of the forgiveness application.

             f.    In support of the forgiveness application, defendant DADOUN

submitted a doctored bank statement which falsely reflected several transactions

related to Seldat Distribution. For example, the PPP permitted loan recipients to

use loan proceeds for rent payments. Defendant DADOUN altered the bank

statement so that it appeared as though Seldat Distribution had made certain rent

payments when, in fact, it had not.

             g.    As a result of these misrepresentations, the loan was partially

forgiven. Defendant DADOUN never repaid the remainder of the loan.

             h.    Defendant DADOUN also submitted false and fraudulent loan

applications for other businesses he controlled, including DG Distiservices and

Seldat Staffing. As a result of the misrepresentations made in these loan

applications, the Victim Lenders funded additional PPP loans for his businesses.

             i.    Thereafter, defendant DADOUN made misrepresentations and

submitted false documents in support of loan forgiveness applications for those

loans, which fraudulently caused the Victim Lenders to forgive the loans.

             j.    As a result of the fraudulent scheme, defendant DADOUN

                                          5
obtained a total of approximately $3,239,774.43 in PPP loan proceeds from the

Victim Lenders.

      5.     From in or around April 2020 through in or around September 2021, in

the District of New Jersey and elsewhere, the defendant,

                                DANIEL DADOUN,

knowingly and intentionally executed and attempted to execute a scheme and

artifice to defraud one or more financial institutions, namely, Victim-Lender 1, the

deposits of which were insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and

to obtain money, funds, credits, assets, securities, and other property owned by, and

under the control of, Victim-Lender 1 by means of false and fraudulent pretenses,

representations, and promises, that is $2,125,000 in PPP loan proceeds.

      In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1344.




                                          6
                                    COUNT TWO
                                 (Money Laundering)

      6.     The allegations set forth in Paragraphs 1, 3, and 4 of Count One of this

Information are realleged here.

      7.     On or about April 23, 2020, in the District of New Jersey and elsewhere,

the defendant,

                                  DANIEL DADOUN,

knowingly engaged in the following monetary transaction by, through, and to a

financial institution, affecting interstate and foreign commerce, in criminally

derived property of a value greater than $10,000, that is, the transfer of

approximately $2,125,000 from the Seldat Distribution Bank Account to the Seldat

Fashion Bank Account, such property having been derived from a specified unlawful

activity, that is, bank fraud.

      In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1957.




                                          7
               FORFEITURE ALLEGATION AS TO COUNT ONE

      As a result of committing the offense in violation of Title 18, United

States Code, Section 1344 charged in Count One of this Information, defendant

DADOUN shall forfeit to the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States

Code, Section 982(a)(2)(A), any property, real or personal, constituting, or derived

from, proceeds obtained directly or indirectly as a result of such offense.

              FORFEITURE ALLEGATION AS TO COUNT TWO

      As a result of committing the money laundering offense charged in Count

Two of this Information, defendant DADOUN shall forfeit to the United States,

pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 982(a)(1), all property, real or

personal, involved in such offense, and all property traceable to such property.




                                           8
                       SUBSTITUTE ASSET PROVISION
                    (Applicable to All Forfeiture Allegations)

      If any of the property described above, as a result of any act or omission

of the defendant:

             a. cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence;

             b. has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third party;

             c. has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the court;

             d. has been substantially diminished in value; or

             e. has been commingled with other property which cannot be divided

                without difficulty,

it is the intent of the United States, pursuant to Title 21, United States Code,

Section 853(p), as incorporated by Title 18, United States Code, Section 982(b), to

seek forfeiture of any other property of the defendant up to the value of the

forfeitable property described above.



                                              ______________________
                                              ALINA HABBA
                                              United States Attorney




                                          9
       CASE NUMBER:
═════════════════════════════════
United States District Court
  District of New Jersey
═════════════════════════════════
 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                v.

       DANIEL DADOUN

═════════════════════════════════
  INFORMATION FOR
          18 U.S.C. § 1344
          18 U.S.C. § 1957

═════════════════════════════════
           ALINA HABBA
      UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
   FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
═════════════════════════════════
      KATHERINE M. ROMANO
       ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY
        NEWARK, NEW JERSEY
             973-353-6095
═════════════════════════════════


File and source

File
dl_33a470bbeadb5797.pdf
Size
166,698 bytes
SHA-256
71286ae6ba8e19c75d9058764a525f893e2d4ef64d1260d06edb9018ceea6e48
Our copy
dl_33a470bbeadb5797.pdf
Original
www.justice.gov
Back to top