Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Information — No. 1:23-cr-00546 (Dkt. 1, D.N.J.)

Information — No. 1:23-cr-00546 (Dkt. 1, D.N.J.)

Full text

 Case 1:23-cr-00546-KMW       Document 1       Filed 07/10/23   Page 1 of 10 PageID: 1



2023R00440/DAF/JMR
                       UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                          DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA               :        Crim. No. 23-546 (KMW)
                                       :
      v.                               :        18 U.S.C. § 1349
                                       :
YASHA BARJONA,                         :
    a/k/a “Rahni Song”                 :


                              INFORMATION

      The defendant having waived in open court prosecution by Indictment

and any objection based on venue, the United States Attorney for the District of

New Jersey charges:

                       The Defendant and Co-Conspirators

      1.    At all times relevant to this Information:

            a.       The defendant, YASHA BARJONA, a/k/a “Rahni Song,”

resided in Phoenix, Arizona. Defendant YASHA BARJONA owned or controlled

VisionWorks Group of America LLC and Y3K Entertainment LLC.

            b.       Co-Conspirator-1 (“CC-1”) was a co-conspirator but is not

named as a defendant herein.

            c.       Co-Conspirator-2 (“CC-2”) was a co-conspirator but is not

named as a defendant herein.

            d.       Co-Conspirator-3 (“CC-3”) was a co-conspirator but is not

named as a defendant herein.




                                           1
 Case 1:23-cr-00546-KMW     Document 1       Filed 07/10/23   Page 2 of 10 PageID: 2




            e.     Co-Conspirator-4 (“CC-4”) was a co-conspirator but is not

named as a defendant herein.

            f.     Lender-1 was a financial institution that participated as

lender in the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”), as described herein.

Lender-1 was a “financial institution” within the meaning of Title 18, United

States Code, Section 20.

            g.     The U.S. Small Business Administration (“SBA”) was an

independent agency of the federal government created to aid, counsel, assist,

and protect the interests of small business concerns, preserve free competitive

enterprise, and maintain and strengthen the overall economy of the United

States.

                      The Paycheck Protection Program

            h.     The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security

(“CARES”) Act was a federal law enacted in or around March 2020 and was

designed to provide emergency financial assistance to the millions of Americans

who suffered the economic effects caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. One

source of relief provided by the CARES Act was the authorization of billions of

dollars in forgivable loans to small businesses for job retention and certain

other expenses, through a program referred to as the Paycheck Protection

Program (“PPP”).

            i.     To obtain a PPP loan, a qualifying business had to submit a

PPP loan application signed by an authorized representative of the business.

The applicant of a PPP loan was required to acknowledge the program rules

                                         2
 Case 1:23-cr-00546-KMW     Document 1       Filed 07/10/23   Page 3 of 10 PageID: 3




and make certain affirmative certifications in order to be eligible to obtain the

PPP loan. In the PPP loan application, the applicant had to state, among other

things, its average monthly payroll expenses and number of employees. These

figures were used to calculate the amount of money the business was eligible to

receive under the PPP. In addition, businesses applying for a PPP loan had to

provide documentation showing their payroll expenses.

            j.     A PPP loan application had to be processed by a participating

financial institution (the lender). If the PPP loan application was approved, the

lender funded the PPP loan using its own monies, which were 100%

guaranteed by the SBA. Data from the application, including information

about the borrower, the total amount of the loan, and the listed number of

employees, was transmitted by the lender to the SBA in the course of

processing the loan.

            k.     PPP loan proceeds could only be used by the business for

certain permissible expenses, including payroll costs, interest on mortgages,

rent, and utilities. The PPP allowed the interest and principal on the PPP loan

to be entirely forgiven if the business used the loan proceeds on these expense

items within a designated period of time after receiving the proceeds and used

a certain amount of the PPP loan proceeds on payroll expenses.

                 The Economic Injury Disaster Loan Program

            l.     The Economic Injury Disaster Loan (“EIDL”) program was an

SBA program that provided low-interest financing to small businesses, renters,

and homeowners in regions affected by declared disasters.

                                         3
 Case 1:23-cr-00546-KMW     Document 1       Filed 07/10/23   Page 4 of 10 PageID: 4




            m.    The CARES Act authorized the SBA to provide EIDLs of up to

$2 million to eligible small businesses that were experiencing substantial

financial disruption due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

            n.    To obtain an EIDL, a qualifying business was required to

submit an application to the SBA and provide information about its operations,

such as the number of employees, gross revenues for the 12-month period

preceding the disaster, and cost of goods sold in the 12-month period

preceding the disaster. In addition, the business entity must have been in

operation on February 1, 2020.

            o.    The amount of the EIDL was determined based, in part, on

the information provided by the applicant regarding the revenue, employees,

and cost of goods of the business. The SBA directly issued any funds

disbursed under an EIDL to the applicant business. A business was permitted

to use EIDL funds for payroll expenses, sick leave, production costs, and

business obligations such as debts, rent, and mortgage payments. If a

business also obtained a PPP loan, the business was prohibited from using

EIDL funds for the same purpose as PPP funds.

                                 The Conspiracy

      2.    From in or about November 2020 through in or about June 2021,

in Maricopa County in the District of Arizona and elsewhere, the defendant,

                    YASHA BARJONA, a/k/a “Rahni Song”

did knowingly and intentionally conspire and agree with others, known and

unknown, to devise a scheme and artifice to defraud a financial institution,
                                         4
 Case 1:23-cr-00546-KMW     Document 1       Filed 07/10/23   Page 5 of 10 PageID: 5




namely Lender-1, and to obtain moneys, funds, credits, assets, securities, or

other property owned by, or under, the custody or control of, a financial

institution, namely Lender-1, by means of false or fraudulent pretenses,

representations, or promises, contrary to Title 18, United States Code, Section

1344.

                           Object of the Conspiracy

        3.   The object of the conspiracy was for defendant YASHA BARJONA

and his co-conspirators to financially enrich themselves by obtaining federal

relief funds that were intended for small businesses distressed by the COVID-

19 pandemic by submitting fraudulent loan applications that included false

statements about their businesses’ number of employees, payroll, and

expenses, and by providing false documentation to financial institutions.

                     Manner and Means of the Conspiracy

        4.   It was part of the conspiracy that:

             a.    CC-1 introduced defendant YASHA BARJONA to CC-2 and

CC-3 and told YASHA BARJONA that CC-2 and CC-3 could assist YASHA

BARJONA in applying for PPP and EIDL loans for defendant YASHA

BARJONA’s businesses and for businesses controlled by defendant YASHA

BARJONA’s associates.

             b.    In or about November 2020 and December 2020, CC-2

prepared fraudulent EIDL applications for Visionworks Group of America and a

business controlled by an associate of defendant YASHA BARJONA.



                                         5
 Case 1:23-cr-00546-KMW       Document 1       Filed 07/10/23   Page 6 of 10 PageID: 6




            c.    In or about March 2021, CC-3 prepared fraudulent PPP

applications for Y3K Entertainment Group LLC and two businesses controlled

by associates of defendant YASHA BARJONA.

            d.    Each of the PPP and EIDL loan applications prepared by CC-

2 and CC-3 contained materially false and fraudulent information, including

the number of individuals employed by the applicant business and the

business’s payroll, expenses, and revenue. These figures did not accurately

represent the business’s true operations and were inflated, which caused each

business to obtain a loan it would not have been qualified to receive, or to

receive a loan in an amount higher than it would have qualified for had the

applications been accurate.

            e.    As part of the loan applications, CC-2 and CC-3 prepared

materially false and fraudulent IRS Forms, including Forms 941 (Employer’s

Quarterly Federal Tax Return) and Form 1040 (U.S. Individual Income Tax

Return), that were created solely for purposes of applying for the PPP and EIDL

loans and were never submitted to the IRS.

            f.    Based on these fraudulent loan applications prepared by CC-

2 and CC-3, Lender-1 and the SBA approved 3 PPP loans and 2 EIDL loans and

disbursed approximately $724,300.

            g.    For CC-1’s role in recruiting defendant YASHA BARJONA

and introducing defendant YASHA BARJONA to CC-2 and CC-3, defendant

YASHA BARJONA and his associates who received loans paid CC-1 kickbacks



                                           6
 Case 1:23-cr-00546-KMW    Document 1       Filed 07/10/23   Page 7 of 10 PageID: 7




of at least 50 percent of the loan amounts. Defendant YASHA BARJONA also

received payments from his associates after they received loans.

                          Furthering the Conspiracy

      5.    In furtherance of the conspiracy and to effect its objects, defendant

YASHA BARJONA and his co-conspirators committed and caused to be

committed the following acts.

      6.    In or about March 2021, defendant YASHA BARJONA moved his

company Y3K Entertainment Group LLC into the name of CC-4 for the

purposes of applying for a PPP loan.

      7.    On or about March 19, 2021, CC-2 prepared—and defendant

YASHA BARJONA and CC-4 submitted—a PPP loan application to Lender-1 on

behalf of Y3K Entertainment Group LLC (the “Y3K PPP Application”).

      8.    The Y3K PPP Application contained materially false and fraudulent

information, including that Y3K had 18 employees and had an average monthly

payroll of $59,000.

      9.    The Y3K PPP application also included purported 2019 Forms 941

in the name of Y3K. Per the Forms 941, Y3K reported paying 18 employees

$172,500 in wages, tips, and other compensation each quarter of 2019. The

Forms 941 were created solely for purposes of applying for the PPP loan and

were never submitted to the IRS.

      10.   In fact, Y3K had no employees and paid no wages in 2019.

      11.   On or about June 15, 2021, Y3K Entertainment Group was

approved for a PPP loan in the amount of $145,000. The loan proceeds were

                                        7
 Case 1:23-cr-00546-KMW     Document 1       Filed 07/10/23   Page 8 of 10 PageID: 8




disbursed to a Lender-1 business checking account in the name of Y3K

Entertainment Group.

      12.   Between on or about June 15, 2021 and on or about June 21,

2021, defendant YASHA BARJONA caused three checks to be written to

companies controlled by CC-1, totaling $90,549 (or approximately 62 percent

of the loan amount).

      In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1349.




                                         8
 Case 1:23-cr-00546-KMW      Document 1       Filed 07/10/23   Page 9 of 10 PageID: 9




                            FORFEITURE ALLEGATION

      1.     As a result of committing the offense charged in Count One of this

Information, defendant YASHA BARJONA, a/k/a “Rahni Song,” shall forfeit to

the United States, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 982(a)(2), all property, real or

personal, constituting or derived from proceeds traceable to the offense charged

in this Information, the value of which totaled $227,330.00.

                        SUBSTITUTE ASSETS PROVISION

      If any of the property described above, as a result of any act or omission

of the defendant:

      a. cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence;

      b. has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third party;

      c. has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the court;

      d. has been substantially diminished in value; or

      e. has been commingled with other property which cannot be divided

      without difficulty,

the United States shall be entitled, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(p), as

incorporated by 18 U.S.C. § 982(b)(1) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), to forfeiture of

any other property of the defendant up to the value of the above-described

forfeitable property.



                                      _______________________
                                      PHILIP R. SELLINGER
                                      United States Attorney


                                          9
Case 1:23-cr-00546-KMW    Document 1    Filed 07/10/23    Page 10 of 10 PageID: 10




                       CASE NUMBER: _____________
                   ═════════════════════════════════
                 United States District Court
                   District of New Jersey
                   ═════════════════════════════════
                   UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                                       v.

                            YASHA BARJONA

                   ═════════════════════════════════
                         INFORMATION FOR
                               18 U.S.C. § 1349

                   ═════════════════════════════════
                            PHILIP R. SELLINGER
                            UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
                         FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
                   ═════════════════════════════════
                            DANIEL A. FRIEDMAN
                           JASON M. RICHARDSON
                         ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEYS
                           CAMDEN, NEW JERSEY
                              (856) 757-5026
                   ═════════════════════════════════


File and source

File
gov.uscourts.njd.514724.1.0.pdf
Size
148,047 bytes
SHA-256
3a7901601090ab50d0aaf9f66368b528f02f6f37e9f89de5ac1ce0cd8c55ac44
Our copy
gov.uscourts.njd.514724.1.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top