Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Indictment — United States v. Rami Saab, Eastern District of New York (Document 14)Search ⌕

Indictment — United States v. Rami Saab, Eastern District of New York (Document 14)

Summary

An indictment against Rami Saab, also known as Rami Hasan, Case 2:22-cr-00344-GRB-JMW, filed 07/27/22 as Document 14 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. It charges disaster relief fraud (Count One), false statements to the Small Business Administration (Count Two), conspiracy to commit wire fraud (Count Three), wire fraud (Count Four) and conspiracy to commit money laundering (Count Five). The indictment alleges that Saab submitted or caused at least six PPP loan applications for his Subject Entities with false employee, payroll and use-of-proceeds information, and that approximately $3,593,290 was transferred to accounts he controlled. It alleges he used the proceeds for cash withdrawals and transfers to associates overseas, and it includes forfeiture allegations.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Indictment — United States v. Rami Saab, Eastern District of New York (Document 14).” Original at ecf.nyed.uscourts.gov. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/indictment-usa-v-saab-dkt-14-e-d-n-y-908f0c6a5a/, SHA-256 31ac710ea4185b7223ebbf2d5b81ac789224d45a2e6a6378ca83d9a44bf578c7.

Full text

Case 2:22-cr-00344-GRB-JMW             Document 14       Filed 07/27/22     Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 34


                                                                                       F L ED
                                                                             ..    IN CLERK'S OFFICE
                                                                             U.S. DISTRICT COURT E.D.N.Y.

    CCC:MRM                                                                  * JUL 17 2022 ★
    F.#2020R00902
                                                                              LONG island office
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
    EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
                                           X


   UNITED STATES OF AMERICA                                INDICTMENT

             - against -                                   Cr.No   r, R           22 3 4 4
                                                           (T. 18,U,S.C., §§ 981(a)(1)(C),^82(a)(l),
   RAMISAAB,                                                982(b)(1), 1014,1040(a)(2), lOfl0(b)(1),
        also known as "Rami Hasan,"                         1343, 1349, 1956(h),2 and 35511 et seq.:
                                                            T.21,U.S.C.,§ 853(p); T. 28, U S.C., §
                             Defendant,                     2461(c))

                                           X


   THE GRAND JURY CHARGES:


                                          INTRODUCTION


                    At all times relevant to this Indictment, unless otherwise indi\fifl£^KS, M.J.
   The COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States


                    1.     In or about December 2019, a novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2(the

   "coronavirus") caused outbreaks ofthe coronavirus disease COVID-19 that spread globally. On

   or about January 31,2020, the Secretary of Health and Human Services declared a nation U

   public health emergency under 42 U.S.C. § 247d as a result ofthe spread of COVID-19 to and

   within the United States. On or about March 11,2020,the Director-General ofthe World

   Health Organization characterized COVID-19 as a pandemic. On or about March 13, 2020,the

   President ofthe United States issued Proclamation 9994 declaring a national emergency

   beginning on March 1,2020, as a result ofthe rapid spread of COVID-19 within the United

   States.
Case 2:22-cr-00344-GRB-JMW            Document 14         Filed 07/27/22      Page 2 of 9 PageID #: 35




    The Paycheck Protection Program

                   2.     On or about March 27,2020,the President signed into law the

    Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security("CARES")Act. The CARES Act was a

   federal law designed to provide emergency financial assistance to the millions of Ameri(;ans who

    were suffering the economic effects caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. One source of relief

   provided by the CARES Act was the authorization of up to $349 billion in forgivable loans to

   small businesses forjob retention and certain other expenses, through a program referred to as

   the Paycheck Protection Program ("PPP"). In or around April 2020, Congress authorized over

   $300 billion in additional PPP funding.

                  3.      To obtain a PPP loan, qualifying businesses were required to submit a PPP

   loan application, which was signed by an authorized representative ofthe business. The PPP

   loan application required recipient businesses, through an authorized representative, to

   acknowledge the program rules and make certain affirmative certifications to establish eligibility

   for the PPP loan. For example,in the PPP loan application, recipient businesses, through an

   authorized representative, were required to state, among other things, their average monthly

   payroll expenses and number ofemployees. These figures were used to calculate the amount of

   money the businesses were eligible to receive under the PPP. The recipient businesses were

   also required to provide documentation supporting the information contained in the PPP loan

   application.

                  4.     PPP loan proceeds were required to be used by the recipient businesses on

  certain permissible expenses,to wit: payroll costs, interest on mortgages, rent and utilities, The

  PPP allowed the interest and principal on a PPP loan to be entirely forgiven if the recipient
Case 2:22-cr-00344-GRB-JMW             Document 14         Filed 07/27/22      Page 3 of 9 PageID #: 36




   businesses spent the loan proceeds on these expense items within a designated period offime

   after receiving the proceeds and used a certain percentage for payroll costs.

                  5.      The PPP was overseen by the Small Business Administration("SBA"),

   which had authority over all PPP loans. Individual PPP loans, however, were issued and

   approved by private lenders, which received and processed PPP loan applications and supporting

   documentation and,following SBA approval, made loans using the lenders' own funds.

   The Defendant and His Fraud Scheme


                 6.      The defendant RAMI SAAB,also known as "Rami Hasan," was a resident

   of Glen Cove,New York. SAAB was associated with numerous corporate entities (the 'jSubject
   Entities"), through which he committed the fraud described herein.

                 7.      On or about and between June 1,2020 and May 31,2021, both dates being

   approximate and inclusive, the defendant RAMI SAAB engaged in a scheme to defraud tpe SBA

  and several financial institutions administering the PPP program offederal COVID-19

  emergency relieffunds meant for distressed small businesses. It was a part ofthe schema to

  defraud that SAAB submitted, or caused to be submitted, at least six online loan applications to

  obtain funds through the PPP programs for the Subject Entities. It was further a part ofthe

  scheme to defraud that these loan applications and certain supporting documentation contained

  materially false and fraudulent information, including, but not limited to, the Subject Entities'

  number ofemployees, payroll costs and intended use ofthe loan proceeds, all of which W£.s

  specifically designed to mislead the SBA and financial institutions administering the PPP

  program into disbursing various loans, which they did.

                 8.     In total, on or about and between June 1,2020 and May 31, 2021, both

  dates being approximate and inclusive, as a result of this fraudulent scheme,the SBA and
Case 2:22-cr-00344-GRB-JMW              Document 14          Filed 07/27/22      Page 4 of 9 PageID #: 37


                                                                                                      4



   financial institutions administering the PPP programs wire-transferred sums totaling

   approximately $3,593,290 in PPP loans for the Subject Entities to bank accounts that the

   defendant KAMI SAAB had access to and control over at bank branches in the Eastern district

   of New York and elsewhere.


                  9.      Shortly after receiving these loan proceeds,the defendant RAM SAAB,

   together with others, engaged in numerous financial transactions designed to conceal the^e
   nature and source ofthe funds, including electronically transferring certain ofthe loan proceeds

   between various bank accounts to which SAAB had access and control. SAAB then util ized the

   laundered loan proceeds to enrich himself and others, including by personally making cash

   withdrawals and transferring funds to associates overseas.

                                              COUNT ONE
                                         (Disaster ReliefFraud)

                  10.     The allegations contained in paragraphs one through nine are realleged

  and incorporated as iffully set forth in this paragraph.

                  11.     On or about and between June 1,2020 and May 31,2021, both dates being

  approximate and inclusive, within the Eastem District ofNew York and elsewhere,the defendant

  RAM SAAB,also known as "Rami Hasan," together with others, did knowingly and

  intentionally make one or more materially false, fictitious, and fraudulent statements and

  representations, and make and use one or more false writings and documents knowing the same

  to contain materially false, fictitious, and jfraudulent statements and representations, in

  coimection with a procurement of property and services related to an emergency declaration

  under Section 501 ofthe Stafford Act, to wit: Proclamation 9994 of March 13,2020 by the

  President ofthe United States of America Declaring a National Emergency Concerning a Novel
Case 2:22-cr-00344-GRB-JMW              Document 14       Filed 07/27/22      Page 5 of 9 PageID #: 38




    Coronavirus Disease(COVID-19) Outbreak, which benefits were authorized, transported

   transmitted, transferred, disbursed and paid in and affecting interstate and foreign commerce.

                   (Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1040(a)(2), 1040(b)(1),2 and

   3551 et seq.)


                                              COUNT TWO
                         (False Statements to the Small Business Administration)

                   12.     The allegations contained in paragraphs one through nine are reallpged

   and'incorporated as iffully set forth in this paragraph.

                   13.     On or about and between June 1,2020 and May 31,2021, both da^es being
   approximate and inclusive, within the Eastern District ofNew York and elsewhere,the defendant

   KAMI SAAB,also known as"Kami Hasan," together with others, did knowingly make c(ne or

   more false statements and reports for the purpose of influencing the action ofthe SBA in

   connection with an application, advance, discount, purchase, purchase agreement,repurchase

   agreement, commitment, loan and insurance agreement and application for insurance and

   guarantee, and any change and extension ofany ofthe same, by renewal, deferment of action or

   otherwise, and the acceptance, release and substitution of security therefor, to wit: SAAB

   provided false information in fraudulent PPP loan applications to induce the SBA to approve

   loans to the Subject Entities.

                   (Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1014,2 and 3551 et seq.'l

                                            COUNT THREE
                                    (Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud)

                   14.    The allegations contained in paragraphs one through nine are realleged and

  incorporated as iffully set forth in this paragraph.
Case 2:22-cr-00344-GRB-JMW             Document 14           Filed 07/27/22    Page 6 of 9 PageID #: 39




                   15.    On or about and between June 1,2020 and May 31,2021, both dal es being

   approximate and inclusive, within the Eastern District ofNew York and elsewhere, the defendant

   KAMI SAAB,also known as "Rami Hasan," together with others, did knowingly and

   intentionally conspire to devise a scheme and artifice to defraud the SBA and several fm£tncial

   institutions administering the PPP program offederal COVTD-19 emergency relieffunds meant

   for distressed small businesses, and to obtain money and property from the SBA and the

   financial institutions by means of materially false and fraudulent pretenses, representations and

   promises,and for the purpose ofexecuting such scheme and artifice, to transmit and caus(; to be

  transmitted by means of wire communication in interstate and foreign conimerce, writingsj, signs,

   signals, pictures and sounds, contrary to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343.

                 (Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1349 and 3551 et seq.")

                                            COUNT FOUR
                                             (Wire Fraud)

                  16.    The allegations contained in paragraphs one through nine axQ realle^ed
  and incoiporated as iffully set forth in this paragraph.

                  17.    On or about and between June 1,2020 and May 31,2021, both datep being

  approximate and inclusive, within the Eastern District ofNew York and elsewhere, the defendant

  RAMI SAAB,also known as "Rami Hasan," together with others, did knowingly and

  intentionally devise a scheme and artifice to defraud the SBA and several financial institutions

  administering the PPP program, and to obtain money and property from the SBA and the

  financial institutions, by means of one or more materially false and fraudulent pretenses,

  representations and promises, and for the purpose of executing such scheme and artifice did

  transmit and cause to be transmitted, by means of wire communication in interstate commerce.
Case 2:22-cr-00344-GRB-JMW             Document 14        Filed 07/27/22       Page 7 of 9 PageID #: 40




    one or more writings, signs, signals and pictures, to wit: an electronic transmission offraudulent

   PPP loan applications and falsified supporting documents for the Subject Entities.

                  (Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1343,2 and 3551 et seq.)

                                              COUNT FIVE
                              (Conspiracy to Commit Money Laundering)

                  18.     The allegations contained in paragraphs one through nine are reall^ged and

   incorporated as iffully set forth in this paragraph.

                  19.     On or about and between June 1,2020 and May 31,2021, both dalles being
   approximate and inclusive, within the Eastern District ofNew York and elsewhere,the defendant
   RAMI SAAB,also known as "Rami Hasan," together with others, did knowingly and

   intentionally conspire to conduct one or more financial transactions in and affecting interstate

   and foreign commerce,including deposits, transfers and withdrawals offunds and monetJiry

   instruments, which in fact involved the proceeds ofspecified unlawful activity, to wit: wire fraud,

   in violation of Title 18, United States Code,Section 1343, knowing that the property involved in

   the financial transactions represented the proceeds ofsome form of unlawful activity, and

   knowing that the transactions were designed in whole and in part to conceal and disguise the

   nature, location, source, ownership and control ofthe proceeds of specified unlawful actiVity,

   contrary to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1956(a)(l)(B)(i).

                 (Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1956(h)and 3551 ^seg.l

                             CRIMINAL FORFEITURE ALLEGATION
                             AS TO COUNTS TWO THROUGH FOUR


                 20.     The United States hereby gives notice to the defendant that, upon his

  conviction ofany ofthe offenses charged in Count Two through Count Four,the govemmjent
   will seek forfeiture in accordance with Title 18, United States Code,Section 981(a)(1)(C)hnd
Case 2:22-cr-00344-GRB-JMW              Document 14         Filed 07/27/22       Page 8 of 9 PageID #: 41




    Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461(c), which require any person convicted of such

    offenses to forfeit any property, real or personal, constituting, or derived from,proceeds obtained

    directly or indirectly as a result ofsuch offenses.

                   21.     Ifany ofthe above-described forfeitable property, as a result of aqy act or

   omission ofthe defendant:


                          (a)      cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence;

                          (b)      has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third party;

                          (c)      has been placed beyond the jurisdiction ofthe court;

                          (d)      has been substantially diminished in value; or

                          (e)     has been commingled with other property which cannot be divided

   without difficulty;

   it is the intent ofthe United States, pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p), to

   seek forfeiture of any other property ofthe defendant up to the value ofthe forfeitable prcjperty

   described in this forfeiture allegation.

                  (Title 18, United States Code, Section 981(a)(1)(C); Title 21, United States Code,

   Section 853(p); Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461(c))

                                CRIMINAL FORFEITURE ALLEGATION
                                          AS TO COUNT FIVE


                  22.     The United States hereby gives notice to the defendant that, upon his
   conviction ofthe offense charged in Count Five, the government will seek forfeiture in

   accordance with Title 18, United States Code, Section 982(a)(1), which requires any person

  convicted ofsuch offense to forfeit any property, real or personal, involved in such offense^ or

  any property traceable to such property
Case 2:22-cr-00344-GRB-JMW             Document 14         Filed 07/27/22       Page 9 of 9 PageID #: 42




                   23.    If any ofthe above-described forfeitable property, as a result ofan]^ act or

   omission ofthe defendant:


                           (a)     cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence;

                           (b)     has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third party;

                           (c)     has been placed beyond the jurisdiction ofthe court;

                           (d)     has been substantially diminished in value; or

                          (e)      has been commingled with other property which cannot be

   divided without difficulty;

   it is the intent ofthe United States, pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(b), as

   incorporated by Title 18, United States Code, Section 982(b)(1), to seek forfeiture ofany other

   property ofthe defendant up to the value ofthe forfeitable property described in this forfeiture

   allegation.

                 (Title 18, United States Code,Sections 982(a)(1) and 982(b)(1); Title 21, Upited

  States Code, Section 853(p))


                                                                       A TRUE BILL




                                                                      FOREP^Rsoij;^^;:;:::::^


          BREON PEACE
          UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
          EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

  By:
          Assistant U.S. Attomey


File and source

File
14-indictment-as-to-rami-saab.pdf
Size
513,929 bytes
SHA-256
31ac710ea4185b7223ebbf2d5b81ac789224d45a2e6a6378ca83d9a44bf578c7
Our copy
14-indictment-as-to-rami-saab.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top