Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Indictment — United States v. Robert K. Asante et al. (Dkt. 22, S.D. Ohio)

Indictment — United States v. Robert K. Asante et al. (Dkt. 22, S.D. Ohio)

Summary

A federal grand jury indictment in the Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, charges Robert K. Asante, Kwame Yeboah and Eric Ahiekpor with one count of conspiracy to commit money laundering under 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h), from on or about December 1, 2014 through March 4, 2020. It alleges that the defendants laundered the proceeds of online romance scams in which scammers built relationships with victims through dating-site profiles and then asked for money sent to accounts that, in part, the defendants controlled. The indictment says the conspirators used bank accounts in their own names, family members' names and company names, and moved funds through checks, cash and ATM withdrawals, money service transfers and wires to individuals and companies in Ghana and to companies in China. A forfeiture allegation seeks property involved in the offense under 18 U.S.C. § 982(a)(1).

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.

FILED
RICHARD WN
CLERK OF COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT aT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO JUN 23 PMs; 45
EASTERN DIVISION & 7 min TRICT CouRT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, EAST. BW coat
CASE NO. 5
INDICTMENT
ROBERT K. ASANTE, Jud ;
KWAME YEBOAH, and 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h) udge Morrison
ERIC AHIEKPOR,
FORFEITURE ALLEGATION
Defendants.
THE GRAND JURY CHARGES:

COUNT 1
(Conspiracy to Commit Money Laundering)

l. From on or about December 1, 2014, through March 4, 2020, in the Southern
District of Ohio and elsewhere, Defendants ROBERT K. ASANTE, KWAME YEBOAH, and
ERIC AHTEKPOR did knowingly combine, conspire, and agree with each other and with other
persons known and unknown to the Grand Jury to commit offenses against the United States in
violation of 18 U.S.C, §§ 1956 and 1957—namely:

a. to knowingly conduct and attempt to conduct financial transactions
affecting interstate commerce and foreign commerce, which transactions involved the
proceeds of specified unlawful! activity--namely, wire fraud—knowing that the
transactions were designed in whole or in part to conceal and disguise the nature,
location, source, ownership, and control of the proceeds of specified unlawful activity,

and that while conducting and attempting to conduct such financial transactions, knew
that the property involved in the financial transactions represented the proceeds of some
form of unlawful activity, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(1)(B)(@); and

b. to transport, transmit, and transfer, and attempt to transport, transmit, and
transfer funds involving the proceeds of specified unlawful activity—namely, wire
fraud—from a place in the United States to or through a place outside the United States,
knowing that the funds involved in the transportation, transmission, and transfer
represented the proceeds of some form of unlawful activity and knowing that such
transportation, transmission, and transfer was designed in whole or in part to conceal and
disguise the nature, location, source, ownership, and control of the proceeds of specified
unlawful activity, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(2)(B)(i); and

c. to knowingly engage and attempt to engage, in monetary transactions by,
through or to a financial institution, affecting interstate and foreign commerce, in
criminally derived property of a value greater than $10,000, such property having been
derived from a specified unlawful activity—namely, wire fraud—in violation of 18

U.S.C: § 1957.
MANNER AND MEANS OF THE CONSPIRACY

2. It was part of the conspiracy that Defendants ROBERT K. ASANTE, KWAME
YEBOAH, and ERIC AHTEKPOR and other members of the conspiracy would launder the
proceeds of online romance scams. The perpetrators of the romance scams created several
profiles on online dating sites. The scammers then contacted men and women throughout the
United States and elsewhere, with whom they cultivated a sense of affection and, often, romance.
Having established relationships with the victims, the perpetrators of the romance scams
ultimately requested money, ordinarily for investment reasons or need-based reasons. The
perpetrators provided account information and directed where the money should be sent. In part,
these accounts were controlled by Defendants ROBERT K. ASANTE, KWAME YEBOAH,
and ERIC AHIEKPOR. The funds were not used for the purposes claimed by the perpetrators
of the romance scams.

3. It was further part of the conspiracy that Defendants ROBERT K. ASANTE,
KWAME YEBOAH, and ERIC AHTEKPOR and other members of the conspiracy established
or used companies and bank accounts in the companies’ names to launder criminal proceeds.

4, It was further part of the conspiracy that Defendants ROBERT K, ASANTE,
KWAME YEBOAH, and ERIC AHTEKPOR and other members of the conspiracy established
or used bank accounts in their names, in the names of family members, and in the names of their
companies to launder criminal proceeds.

5. It was further part of the conspiracy that Defendants ROBERT K, ASANTE,
KWAME YEBOAH, and ERIC AHIEKPOR and other members of the conspiracy funneled

proceeds from romance scams into the above-described bank accounts and others.
6. It was further part of the conspiracy that Defendants ROBERT K. ASANTE,
KWAME YEBOAH, and ERIC AHIEKPOR and other members of the conspiracy conducted
financial transactions which were designed, in whole or in part, to conceal the nature, location,
source, ownership, and control of the proceeds. These transactions included, in part, transfers of
funds to other accounts by check, cash withdrawals, purchases of official checks, online banking
transfers to third parties, transfers by money service business, ATM cash withdrawals in Ghana,
ATM cash withdrawals in the United States, wires to individuals and companies in Ghana, wires
to companies in China, and wires to companies in the United States. Several of these transactions

were also in excess of $10,000.

7. It was further part of the conspiracy that Defendants ROBERT K. ASANTE,
KWAME YEBOAH, and ERIC AHTEKPOR and other members of the conspiracy
transported, transmitted, and transferred wire fraud proceeds from the United States to Ghana.
This movement of funds was designed in whole or in part to conceal and disguise the nature,
location, source, ownership, and control of the fraud proceeds.

In violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h).
FORFEITURE ALLEGATION

8. Paragraphs | through 7 are incorporated here.

9. Upon conviction of offense alleged in Count 1 of this Indictment, Defendants
ROBERT K. ASANTE, KWAME YEBOAH, and ERIC AHDTEKPOR shall forfeit to the
United States, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 982(a)(1), any property, real or personal, involved in the

offense as alleged in Count 1, or any property traceable to such property.
10. _—sIf, as a result of any act or omission of Defendants ROBERT K. ASANTE,
KWAME YEBOAH, and ERIC AHIEKPOR, the forfeitable property so described, or any
portion thereof:

a. cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence;

b. has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with a third party;

Cc. has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the court;

d. has been substantially diminished in value; or

e. has been commingled with other property which cannot be divided
without difficulty;

it is the intent of the United States, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(p) as incorporated by 18 U.S.C.

§ 982(b)(1), to seek forfeiture of any other property of Defendants ROBERT K. ASANTE,

KWAME YEBOAH, and ERIC AHIEKPOR up to the value of the forfeitable property.
Forfeiture in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 982(a)(1) and Rule 32.2 of the Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure.

A TRUE BILL

s/ Foreperson / 9 |
FOREPERSON

DAVID M. DEVILLERS
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

PETE LENN-APPEEGATE, 0088708
Assistant United States Attorney


File and source

File
gov.uscourts.ohsd.242150.22.0.pdf
Size
183,719 bytes
SHA-256
52f3d7410f970c48a9d738f19c47bffe1f7dc1871ae8bb61b8550593edb13054
Our copy
gov.uscourts.ohsd.242150.22.0.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top