Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Indictment — United States v. Bradley Temple, Northern District of West Virginia (Document 2)Search ⌕

Indictment — United States v. Bradley Temple, Northern District of West Virginia (Document 2)

Summary

An indictment in United States v. Bradley Temple, Case 5:25-cr-00036-JPB-JPM, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, filed October 7, 2025 as Document 2. Counts One through Three charge wire fraud under Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343, citing transmissions of EIDL and PPP applications and an EIDL loan agreement in the name of Righteous Brothers Trucking, including on June 18, 2020 and July 2, 2020. The grand jury alleges that Temple certified a monthly payroll of $76,383 and five employees, was awarded a PPP loan of $190,956.00 and obtained an EIDL loan of $86,500. Count Four charges an unlawful monetary transaction under Section 1957 for a cashier's check drawn on or about July 11, 2020, and a forfeiture allegation follows.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Indictment — United States v. Bradley Temple, Northern District of West Virginia (Document 2).” Original at archive.org. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/indictment-no-5-25-cr-00036-dkt-2-n-d-w-va-f8102ec24d/, SHA-256 304c12d1e1d7e3f96a38793f72c9fbba781726833fa27338f18b498dc56123fc.

Full text

  Case 5:25-cr-00036-JPB-JPM            Document 2         Filed 10/07/25     Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 2

                         UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
                          NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA




  UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                       Criminal No.   ~
  v.                                                                  S:25-CR      36
                                                       Violations:
                                                                       18 U.S.C. §1343
  BRADLEY TEMPLE,                                                      18 U.S.C. §1957
                               Defendant.
                                                                               Lf        F~LED

                                          INDICTMENT                                  OCT -72025
                                                                                 U.S. DISTRICT COURT- WVND
       The Grand Jury charges that:                                                 WHEELING, WV 26003

                                            INTRODUCTION

       At all times relevant to this Indictment:

                             The COVID- 19 Pandemic and the CARES Act

        1.     The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (“CARES”) Act was a federal law

enacted on or about March 2020, designed to provide emergency financial assistance to the millions who

were suffering the economic effects caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.

       2.      Among other relief efforts, the United States sought to provide financial support to

eligible businesses that could be used to offset certain business expenses.

       3.      The Small Business Administration (“SBA”) is an executive branch agency of the United

States government that provides support to entrepreneurs and small businesses.             The SBA is

headquartered in Washington, D.C. and maintains its computer servers outside of the State of West

Virginia. The SBA’s mission was to maintain and strengthen the nation’s economy by enabling the

establishment and viability of small businesses and by assisting in the economic recovery of communities


                                                   1
  Case 5:25-cr-00036-JPB-JPM              Document 2       Filed 10/07/25     Page 2 of 7 PageID #: 3


after disasters.

        4.         As part of this effort, the SBA enabled and provided for loans through banks, credit

unions, and other lenders. These loans have government-backed guarantees.

                                      The Paycheck Protection Program

        5.         One of the loans created was the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) loan. This

program provided loans to small businesses for job retention and certain other expenses.

        6.         To obtain a PPP loan, a qualifying business had to submit a PPP loan application signed

by an authorized representative of the business. The PPP loan application required the business (through

its authorized representative) to acknowledge the program rules and make certain affirmative

certifications in order to be eligible to obtain the PPP loan. One requirement is that the business had to

be in operation as of February 15, 2020. In the PPP loan application, the small business (through its

authorized representative) had to state, among other things, its average monthly payroll expenses and

number of employees. These figures were then used to calculate the amount of money the small business

was eligible to receive under the PPP. In addition, a business applying for a PPP loan had to provide

documentation showing its payroll expenses.

        7.         A PPP loan application must be processed by a participating lender, such as a financial

institution. If a PPP loan is approved, the participating lender funds the PPP loan using its own monies,

which are 100% guaranteed by the SBA. Data from the application, including the information about the

borrower, the total amount of the loan, and the listed number of employees, is transmitted by the lender

to the SBA in the course of processing the loan.

        8.         The PPP loan proceeds must be used by the business on certain permissible expenses    —




payroll costs, interest on mortgages, rent, and utilities. The PPP allows the interest and principal of the

PPP loan to be entirely forgiven if the business spends the loan proceeds on these expense items within

a designated period of time and uses a certain percentage of the PPP loan proceeds on payroll expenses.

                                                   2
  Case 5:25-cr-00036-JPB-JPM            Document 2       Filed 10/07/25        Page 3 of 7 PageID #: 4


       9.      PPP loan applications were electronically submitted or caused to be submitted by the

borrower and received through SBA servers located in Oregon. Once approved, the business received

the PPP loan proceeds via an electronic funds transfer from the third-party lender to a financial account

under the control of the business.

                                     Economic Injury Disaster Loans

        10.    A second source of relief provided by the CARES Act was the authorization for the SBA

to provide Economic Injury Disaster Loans (“EIDL”) to eligible small businesses experiencing

substantial financial disruption due to the COVID-1 9 pandemic.

       11.     In order to obtain an EIDL, a qualifying business had to submit an online application to

the SBA and provide information about its operations, such as the number of employees, gross revenues

for the twelve-month period preceding the disaster, and the cost of goods the business sold in the twelve-

month period preceding the disaster. In the case of EIDLs, the twelve-month period was that preceding

January 31, 2020. The applicant also had to certify that all the information in the application was true

and correct to the best of the applicant’s knowledge.

        12.    EIDL     applications     were    submitted     directly   to     the   SBA     online    at

https://covidl9relief.sba.gov/#/ and processed by the agency with support from a government contractor,

Rapid Finance. The amount of each loan was determined, based in part, on the information provided by

the application about the number of employees, operating expenses for the twelve months prior to the

date of the disaster, gross revenue for the twelve months prior to the disaster, and the cost of goods sold

for the twelve months prior to the date of the disaster. Any funds issued under EIDL were issued directly

by the SBA.

        13.    EIDL funds could be used for payroll expenses, sick leave, production costs, and business

obligations, such as debts, rent, and mortgage payments.



                                                 3
  Case 5:25-cr-00036-JPB-JPM           Document 2        Filed 10/07/25     Page 4 of 7 PageID #: 5


                                COUNTS ONE THROUGH THREE

                                                (Wire Fraud)

       14.     Paragraphs 1 through 13 are hereby realleged as if fully set forth herein.

       15.     Beginning in or about April 1, 2020 and continuing until in or about July 30, 2020

defendant BRADLEY TEMPLE knowingly devised, intended to devise, and participated in a scheme

to defraud the United States by submitting a fraudulent PPP application and a fraudulent EIDL

application containing false representations.

       16.     It was part of the scheme that BRADLEY TEMPLE submitted a PPP application in the

name of a Righteous Brothers Trucking, a business he owned he owned. The application signed by

BRADLEY TEMPLE included false representations designed to fraudulently obtain proceeds

ultimately from the SBA.

       17.     It was a further part of the scheme that BRADLEY TEMPLE would misrepresent and

conceal material facts regarding the businesses for which he submitted a PPP loan application, including

the number of employees at the business and the monthly payroll. BRADLEY TEMPLE falsely

certified under penalty of perjury that Righteous Brothers Trucking had a monthly payroll of $76,383

and had five employees.

       18.     It was part of the scheme that BRADLEY TEMPLE submitted a PPP loan application

for Righteous Brothers Trucking and was awarded a PPP loan in the amount of $190,956.00.

        19.    It was part of the scheme that BRADLEY TEMPLE would misrepresent and conceal

material facts regarding the business for which he submitted an EIDL loan application loan application,

such as the cost of goods sold in the EIDL loan application.

       20.     It was part of the scheme that BRADLEY TEMPLE obtained an EIDL loan in the

amount of $86,500 dollars.



                                                  4
  Case 5:25-cr-00036-JPB-JPM              Document 2      Filed 10/07/25      Page 5 of 7 PageID #: 6


         21.       On or about the dates specified as to each count below, in Wheeling, Ohio County, in

the Northern District of West Virginia, BRADLEY TEMPLE did knowingly transmit or cause to be

transmitted by means of a wire communication in interstate commerce the following writings, signs,

signals, pictures, and sounds:



 Count         Date                Description
 1             April 1 1, 2020     An internet transmission to the SBA server in Iowa constituting a false
                                   and fraudulent application for a EIDL loan in the name Righteous
                                   Brothers Trucking, originating from Ohio County, West Virginia.
 2             June 18, 2020       An internet transmission to the SBA server in Virginia constituting a
                                   false and fraudulent application for a PPP loan in the name of
                                   Righteous Brothers Trucking, originating from Ohio County, West
                                   Virginia.
 3             July 2, 2020        An internet transmission to the SBA server in Iowa constituting a false
                                   and fraudulent authorization and agreement for an EIDL Loan in the
                                   name of Righteous Brothers Trucking originating from Ohio County,
                                   West Virginia.

         In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343.




                                                   5
  Case 5:25-cr-00036-JPB-JPM            Document 2       Filed 10/07/25      Page 6 of 7 PageID #: 7


                                            COUNT FOUR

                                    (Unlawful Monetary Transactions)

        1.      Paragraphs 1 through 21 of Count One are re-alleged and incorporated as though fully set

forth herein.

        2.      On or about July 11, 2020, in Ohio County, in the Northern District of West Virginia, and

elsewhere, defendant BRADLEY TEMPLE, did knowingly engage in a monetary transaction through

and to a financial institution, affecting interstate commerce, in criminally derived property of a value

greater than $10,000, that is, the defendant BRADLEY TEMPLE, made a monetary transactions in or

affecting interstate commerce by or through a financial institution with funds having been derived from

a specified unlawful activity, specifically wire fraud in violation of Title 18, United States Code, 1343,

to wit: withdrew $40,0000 in a cashier check payable to Wolz & Wind Ford, in violation of Title 18,

United States Code, Section 1957.




                                                 6
  Case 5:25-cr-00036-JPB-JPM              Document 2           Filed 10/07/25    Page 7 of 7 PageID #: 8


                                     FORFEITURE ALLEGATION

                                                 Wire Fraud

        1.      Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Sections 2461(c), Title 18 United States Code,

Sections 981(a)(1)(C), 1956(c)(7)(A), and 1961(1) and Title 21, United States Code, Section 853, the

government will seek the forfeiture of property as part of the sentence imposed in this case, that is, the

forfeiture of any property, real or personal, which constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to a

violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343, or a conspiracy to violate such offense, including

a money judgment for the amount of such proceeds.

        2.      Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461(c), the government will seek

forfeiture of substitute property up to the value of property subject to direct forfeiture that is not available

for forfeiture on account of any act or omission contemplated by Title 21, United States Code, Section

853(p)(1).

                                                        A true bill,



                                                         /5/
                                                         Foreperson



/5/
RANDOLPH J. BERNARD
Acting United States Attorney


Jennifer T. Conklin
Assistant U.S. Attorney


Morgan McKee
Assistant U.S. Attorney




                                                    7


File and source

File
2-indictment.pdf
Size
344,342 bytes
SHA-256
304c12d1e1d7e3f96a38793f72c9fbba781726833fa27338f18b498dc56123fc
Our copy
2-indictment.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top