Indictment — United States v. Bradley Temple, Northern District of West Virginia (Document 2)
Summary
An indictment in United States v. Bradley Temple, Case 5:25-cr-00036-JPB-JPM, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, filed October 7, 2025 as Document 2. Counts One through Three charge wire fraud under Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343, citing transmissions of EIDL and PPP applications and an EIDL loan agreement in the name of Righteous Brothers Trucking, including on June 18, 2020 and July 2, 2020. The grand jury alleges that Temple certified a monthly payroll of $76,383 and five employees, was awarded a PPP loan of $190,956.00 and obtained an EIDL loan of $86,500. Count Four charges an unlawful monetary transaction under Section 1957 for a cashier's check drawn on or about July 11, 2020, and a forfeiture allegation follows.
Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Indictment — United States v. Bradley Temple, Northern District of West Virginia (Document 2).”
Original at archive.org. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/indictment-no-5-25-cr-00036-dkt-2-n-d-w-va-f8102ec24d/
, SHA-256 304c12d1e1d7e3f96a38793f72c9fbba781726833fa27338f18b498dc56123fc.Full text
Case 5:25-cr-00036-JPB-JPM Document 2 Filed 10/07/25 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Criminal No. ~
v. S:25-CR 36
Violations:
18 U.S.C. §1343
BRADLEY TEMPLE, 18 U.S.C. §1957
Defendant.
Lf F~LED
INDICTMENT OCT -72025
U.S. DISTRICT COURT- WVND
The Grand Jury charges that: WHEELING, WV 26003
INTRODUCTION
At all times relevant to this Indictment:
The COVID- 19 Pandemic and the CARES Act
1. The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (“CARES”) Act was a federal law
enacted on or about March 2020, designed to provide emergency financial assistance to the millions who
were suffering the economic effects caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.
2. Among other relief efforts, the United States sought to provide financial support to
eligible businesses that could be used to offset certain business expenses.
3. The Small Business Administration (“SBA”) is an executive branch agency of the United
States government that provides support to entrepreneurs and small businesses. The SBA is
headquartered in Washington, D.C. and maintains its computer servers outside of the State of West
Virginia. The SBA’s mission was to maintain and strengthen the nation’s economy by enabling the
establishment and viability of small businesses and by assisting in the economic recovery of communities
1
Case 5:25-cr-00036-JPB-JPM Document 2 Filed 10/07/25 Page 2 of 7 PageID #: 3
after disasters.
4. As part of this effort, the SBA enabled and provided for loans through banks, credit
unions, and other lenders. These loans have government-backed guarantees.
The Paycheck Protection Program
5. One of the loans created was the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) loan. This
program provided loans to small businesses for job retention and certain other expenses.
6. To obtain a PPP loan, a qualifying business had to submit a PPP loan application signed
by an authorized representative of the business. The PPP loan application required the business (through
its authorized representative) to acknowledge the program rules and make certain affirmative
certifications in order to be eligible to obtain the PPP loan. One requirement is that the business had to
be in operation as of February 15, 2020. In the PPP loan application, the small business (through its
authorized representative) had to state, among other things, its average monthly payroll expenses and
number of employees. These figures were then used to calculate the amount of money the small business
was eligible to receive under the PPP. In addition, a business applying for a PPP loan had to provide
documentation showing its payroll expenses.
7. A PPP loan application must be processed by a participating lender, such as a financial
institution. If a PPP loan is approved, the participating lender funds the PPP loan using its own monies,
which are 100% guaranteed by the SBA. Data from the application, including the information about the
borrower, the total amount of the loan, and the listed number of employees, is transmitted by the lender
to the SBA in the course of processing the loan.
8. The PPP loan proceeds must be used by the business on certain permissible expenses —
payroll costs, interest on mortgages, rent, and utilities. The PPP allows the interest and principal of the
PPP loan to be entirely forgiven if the business spends the loan proceeds on these expense items within
a designated period of time and uses a certain percentage of the PPP loan proceeds on payroll expenses.
2
Case 5:25-cr-00036-JPB-JPM Document 2 Filed 10/07/25 Page 3 of 7 PageID #: 4
9. PPP loan applications were electronically submitted or caused to be submitted by the
borrower and received through SBA servers located in Oregon. Once approved, the business received
the PPP loan proceeds via an electronic funds transfer from the third-party lender to a financial account
under the control of the business.
Economic Injury Disaster Loans
10. A second source of relief provided by the CARES Act was the authorization for the SBA
to provide Economic Injury Disaster Loans (“EIDL”) to eligible small businesses experiencing
substantial financial disruption due to the COVID-1 9 pandemic.
11. In order to obtain an EIDL, a qualifying business had to submit an online application to
the SBA and provide information about its operations, such as the number of employees, gross revenues
for the twelve-month period preceding the disaster, and the cost of goods the business sold in the twelve-
month period preceding the disaster. In the case of EIDLs, the twelve-month period was that preceding
January 31, 2020. The applicant also had to certify that all the information in the application was true
and correct to the best of the applicant’s knowledge.
12. EIDL applications were submitted directly to the SBA online at
https://covidl9relief.sba.gov/#/ and processed by the agency with support from a government contractor,
Rapid Finance. The amount of each loan was determined, based in part, on the information provided by
the application about the number of employees, operating expenses for the twelve months prior to the
date of the disaster, gross revenue for the twelve months prior to the disaster, and the cost of goods sold
for the twelve months prior to the date of the disaster. Any funds issued under EIDL were issued directly
by the SBA.
13. EIDL funds could be used for payroll expenses, sick leave, production costs, and business
obligations, such as debts, rent, and mortgage payments.
3
Case 5:25-cr-00036-JPB-JPM Document 2 Filed 10/07/25 Page 4 of 7 PageID #: 5
COUNTS ONE THROUGH THREE
(Wire Fraud)
14. Paragraphs 1 through 13 are hereby realleged as if fully set forth herein.
15. Beginning in or about April 1, 2020 and continuing until in or about July 30, 2020
defendant BRADLEY TEMPLE knowingly devised, intended to devise, and participated in a scheme
to defraud the United States by submitting a fraudulent PPP application and a fraudulent EIDL
application containing false representations.
16. It was part of the scheme that BRADLEY TEMPLE submitted a PPP application in the
name of a Righteous Brothers Trucking, a business he owned he owned. The application signed by
BRADLEY TEMPLE included false representations designed to fraudulently obtain proceeds
ultimately from the SBA.
17. It was a further part of the scheme that BRADLEY TEMPLE would misrepresent and
conceal material facts regarding the businesses for which he submitted a PPP loan application, including
the number of employees at the business and the monthly payroll. BRADLEY TEMPLE falsely
certified under penalty of perjury that Righteous Brothers Trucking had a monthly payroll of $76,383
and had five employees.
18. It was part of the scheme that BRADLEY TEMPLE submitted a PPP loan application
for Righteous Brothers Trucking and was awarded a PPP loan in the amount of $190,956.00.
19. It was part of the scheme that BRADLEY TEMPLE would misrepresent and conceal
material facts regarding the business for which he submitted an EIDL loan application loan application,
such as the cost of goods sold in the EIDL loan application.
20. It was part of the scheme that BRADLEY TEMPLE obtained an EIDL loan in the
amount of $86,500 dollars.
4
Case 5:25-cr-00036-JPB-JPM Document 2 Filed 10/07/25 Page 5 of 7 PageID #: 6
21. On or about the dates specified as to each count below, in Wheeling, Ohio County, in
the Northern District of West Virginia, BRADLEY TEMPLE did knowingly transmit or cause to be
transmitted by means of a wire communication in interstate commerce the following writings, signs,
signals, pictures, and sounds:
Count Date Description
1 April 1 1, 2020 An internet transmission to the SBA server in Iowa constituting a false
and fraudulent application for a EIDL loan in the name Righteous
Brothers Trucking, originating from Ohio County, West Virginia.
2 June 18, 2020 An internet transmission to the SBA server in Virginia constituting a
false and fraudulent application for a PPP loan in the name of
Righteous Brothers Trucking, originating from Ohio County, West
Virginia.
3 July 2, 2020 An internet transmission to the SBA server in Iowa constituting a false
and fraudulent authorization and agreement for an EIDL Loan in the
name of Righteous Brothers Trucking originating from Ohio County,
West Virginia.
In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343.
5
Case 5:25-cr-00036-JPB-JPM Document 2 Filed 10/07/25 Page 6 of 7 PageID #: 7
COUNT FOUR
(Unlawful Monetary Transactions)
1. Paragraphs 1 through 21 of Count One are re-alleged and incorporated as though fully set
forth herein.
2. On or about July 11, 2020, in Ohio County, in the Northern District of West Virginia, and
elsewhere, defendant BRADLEY TEMPLE, did knowingly engage in a monetary transaction through
and to a financial institution, affecting interstate commerce, in criminally derived property of a value
greater than $10,000, that is, the defendant BRADLEY TEMPLE, made a monetary transactions in or
affecting interstate commerce by or through a financial institution with funds having been derived from
a specified unlawful activity, specifically wire fraud in violation of Title 18, United States Code, 1343,
to wit: withdrew $40,0000 in a cashier check payable to Wolz & Wind Ford, in violation of Title 18,
United States Code, Section 1957.
6
Case 5:25-cr-00036-JPB-JPM Document 2 Filed 10/07/25 Page 7 of 7 PageID #: 8
FORFEITURE ALLEGATION
Wire Fraud
1. Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Sections 2461(c), Title 18 United States Code,
Sections 981(a)(1)(C), 1956(c)(7)(A), and 1961(1) and Title 21, United States Code, Section 853, the
government will seek the forfeiture of property as part of the sentence imposed in this case, that is, the
forfeiture of any property, real or personal, which constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to a
violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343, or a conspiracy to violate such offense, including
a money judgment for the amount of such proceeds.
2. Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461(c), the government will seek
forfeiture of substitute property up to the value of property subject to direct forfeiture that is not available
for forfeiture on account of any act or omission contemplated by Title 21, United States Code, Section
853(p)(1).
A true bill,
/5/
Foreperson
/5/
RANDOLPH J. BERNARD
Acting United States Attorney
Jennifer T. Conklin
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Morgan McKee
Assistant U.S. Attorney
7
File and source
- File
- 2-indictment.pdf
- Size
- 344,342 bytes
- SHA-256
- 304c12d1e1d7e3f96a38793f72c9fbba781726833fa27338f18b498dc56123fc
- Our copy
- 2-indictment.pdf
- Original
- archive.org