Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Indictment — United States v. Sheila C. Bynum-Coleman and Rashad H. Coleman, Eastern District of VirginiaSearch ⌕

Indictment — United States v. Sheila C. Bynum-Coleman and Rashad H. Coleman, Eastern District of Virginia

Summary

A grand jury indictment filed under seal March 18, 2025 as Document 3 in United States of America v. Sheila C. Bynum-Coleman and Rashad H. Coleman, No. 3:25-cr-00044-MHL, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. Count One charges conspiracy to commit wire and bank fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1349; Counts Two through Ten charge false statements on loan applications; Count Eleven charges a monetary transaction in criminally derived property. The indictment alleges that from about February 2020 to February 7, 2022 the defendants submitted PPP applications with fabricated income figures and false Schedule C forms, with at least nine funded for at least $225,000. It cites a May 12, 2020 application for J.C. Bynum Construction LLC that led to a $62,500 disbursement. The signature block names United States Attorney Erik S. Siebert.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Indictment — United States v. Sheila C. Bynum-Coleman and Rashad H. Coleman, Eastern District of Virginia.” Original at archive.org. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/indictment-no-3-25-cr-00044-dkt-3-e-d-va-78d7117235/, SHA-256 a9c278df4cab445a3fbe371d8ef1588ad6eb78545756ab8e40e1d240bb0e9cb9.

Full text

 Case 3:25-cr-00044-MHL          Document 3            Filed 03/18/25    Page 1 of 21 PageID# 3


                                                                                   pi
                                                                                         MAR I 8 2025   1
                       IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                      FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA                         CLtKK,U^.
                                                                                   -
                                                                                             district court
                                                                                         RICHMOND VA
                                    RICHMOND DIVISION


 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA                                 UNDER SEAL


                V.                                        Case No. 3:25-cr-
                                                                              44
 SHEILA C. BYNUM-COLEMAN,                                 18U.S.C. § 1349
 also known as “SHEILA C. COLEMAN,                        Conspiracy to Commit Wire and Bank
                                                          Fraud
 and                                                      (Count One)

 RASHAD H. COLEMAN,                                       18U.S.C. §§ 1014&2
                                                          False Statements on Loan Applications
                Defendants.                               (Counts Two through Ten)

                                                          18U.S.C. §§ 1957 & 2
                                                          Engaging in Monetary Transactions in
                                                          Criminally Derived Property
                                                          (Count Eleven)

                                                          Forfeiture Allegation

                                         INDICTMENT
                              MARCH 2025 TERM - At Riclimond


       At all times relevant to this Indictment:


                              INTRODUCTORY ALLEGATIONS


       1.     The defendants, SHEILA C. BYNUM-COLEMAN (also known as “SHEILA C.

COLEMAN” and hereafter, “BYNUM-COLEMAN”) and RASHAD H. COLEMAN (hereafter,

“COLEMAN”), were a married couple residing in Chesterfield County, within the Eastern

District of Virginia. BYNUM-COLEMAN was also a candidate for the Virginia House of

Delegates.

       2.     Atlantic Union Bank and Virginia National Bank were “financial institutions” for

purposes of 18U.S.C. §§20, 1014, 1344, and 1957.




                                                   1
 Case 3:25-cr-00044-MHL          Document 3          Filed 03/18/25    Page 2 of 21 PageID# 4




       3.      J.C. Bynum Construction LLC was a limited liability company formed in the

Commonwealth of Virginia on or about October 13, 2010. From the company’s inception

through on or about September 30, 2020, BYNUM-COLEMAN was listed as the registered

agent for the business; thereafter, from September 30, 2020 through October 30, 2023,

COLEMAN was listed as the registered agent of the business. At all times, the registered address

for the business was within the Eastern District of Virginia.


       4.      Medina House of Fashion LLC was a limited liability company formed in the

Commonwealth of Virginia on or about November 16, 2020 and cancelled on or about December

7, 2021. COLEMAN was listed as the registered agent for the business. At all times, the

registered address for the business was within the Eastern District of Virginia.

       5.      R.H. Coleman Enterprises LLC was a limited liability company formed in the

Commonwealth of Virginia on or about February 20, 2015. On or about July 18, 2018, BYNUM-

COLEMAN submitted a representation to the Chesterfield County Commissioner of Revenue,

stating that the company’s last day of business was December 31, 2017. The company’s business

licensure in Chesterfield County, Virginia thereafter ended on or about January 5, 2018.

Thereafter, on or about May 31, 2018, the company was listed as inactive with the Virginia State

Corporation Commission. On or about May 28, 2020, the defendants filed an application for

reinstatement of the company with the Virginia State Corporation Commission. BYNUM-

COLEMAN was listed as the registered agent for the business until on or about August 25, 2021;

thereafter, COLEMAN was listed as the registered agent of the business. At all times, the

registered address for the business was within the Eastern District of Virginia.

       6.      Coleman REO Services LLC was a limited liability company formed in the

Commonwealth of Virginia on or about October 25, 2017. On or about January 21, 2020,



                                                 2
 Case 3:25-cr-00044-MHL             Document 3        Filed 03/18/25    Page 3 of 21 PageID# 5




BYNUM-COLEMAN submitted a representation to the Chesterfield County Commissioner of

Revenue, stating that the company’s last day of business was February 28, 2018. On or about

January 18, 2022, the defendants cancelled the business with the Virginia State Corporation

Commission. COLEMAN was listed with the Virginia State Corporation Commission as the

registered agent for the business. At all times, the registered address for the business was within

the Eastern District of Virginia.

        7.     Coleman Property Management LLC was a limited liability company formed in

the Commonwealth of Virginia on or about September 16, 2021, and cancelled on or about

January 18, 2022. COLEMAN was listed as the registered agent for the business. At all times.

the registered address for the business was within the Eastern District of Virginia.

        8.     ModaNoir LLC was a limited liability company formed in the Commonwealth of

Virginia on or about May 19, 2021, and cancelled on or about January 18, 2022. COLEMAN

was listed as the registered agent for the business. At all times, the registered address for the

business was within the Eastern District of Virginia.

                           Vir2inia Unemployment Insurance Prosram

        9.     Unemployment insurance (“UI”) is a joint state-federal program intended to

provide temporary financial assistance to certain unemployed workers.

        10.    Following the emergence of the coronavirus pandemic (“COVlD-19”), the United

States Government took steps to slow the spread of the virus and to mitigate its impact on the

public’s health and economic wellbeing. On March 13, 2020, the President declared the ongoing

COVID-19 pandemic to be an emergency under Section 501(b) of the Robert T. Stafford

Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (“Stafford Act”). On March 27, 2020, the

Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”) became law.



                                                  3
Case 3:25-cr-00044-MHL            Document 3          Filed 03/18/25   Page 4 of 21 PageID# 6




        11.    The CARES Act created the Pandemic Unemployment Assistance (“PUA”) and

the Federal Pandemic Unemployment Compensation (“FPUC”) programs, which provided

further benefits to certain unemployed claimants.

        12.    As of April 18, 2020, the President declared that a major disaster existed in all

States and territories under Section 401 of the Stafford Act. On August 8, 2020, to further offset


the pandemic’s impact on American workers, the President authorized the Federal Emergency

Management Agency (“FEMA”) to expend up to $44 billion from the Disaster Relief Fund for

lost wage payments. The President authorized the FEMA Administrator to provide grants to

participating states, territories, and the District of Columbia to administer delivery of lost wages

assistance (“LWA”), which provided further benefits to certain unemployed claimants.

        13.    The PUA, FPUC, and LWA programs are administered by the various states,

including the Commonwealth of Virginia, though the programs’ benefits are funded in part by

the federal government. The Commonwealth of Virginia managed unemployment insurance

compensation programs {i.e., individually, UI, PUA, FPUC, and LWA, and collectively, “UIC”)

through the Virginia Employment Commission (“VEC”).

        14.    To be eligible for Virginia UIC benefits, claimants must have had their hours

reduced by their employer or been separated from employment altogether. Once the VEC

approved a claim, the claimant needed to re-certify unemployment status on a weekly basis; then,

the claimant could receive UIC funds disbursed weekly. Specifically, claimants needed to certify

that they were ready, willing, and able to work each day during the weeks they claimed UIC

benefits.




                                                  4
 Case 3:25-cr-00044-MHL           Document 3         Filed 03/18/25   Page 5 of 21 PageID# 7




                                 The Paycheck Protection Pro2ram


        15.    The United States Small Business Administration (“SBA”) was an executive-

branch agency of the United States government that provided support to entrepreneurs and small

businesses. The mission of the SBA was to maintain and strengthen the nation’s economy by


enabling the establishment and viability of small businesses and by assisting in the economic

recovery of communities after disaster.

       16.     Another source of relief provided by the CARES Act in response to the COVID19

pandemic was the authorization of billions of dollars in forgivable loans to small businesses for

job retention and certain other expenses through a program referred to as the Paycheck

Protection Program (“PPP”).

       17.     To obtain a PPP loan, a qualifying business had to submit a PPP loan application

signed by an authorized representative of the business. To obtain a PPP loan, the applicant was

required to acknowledge the program rules, make certain certifications under penalty of perjury.

and provide certain supporting documentation as part of the loan application.

       18.     A PPP loan application had to be processed by a participating financial lender or

payment processor. If the PPP loan application was approved, the lender or payment processor

funded the PPP loan using its own monies, and such loans were guaranteed by the SBA. Data from

the application was transmitted by the financial lender or payment processor to the SBA while

processing the loan.

        19.    PPP loan proceeds could only be used by the business for certain permissible

expenses—^payroll costs, interest on mortgages, rent, and utilities. The proceeds of a PPP loan

were not permitted to fund the borrower’s ordinary day-to-day living expenses unrelated to the

specified authorized expenses.



                                                 5
Case 3:25-cr-00044-MHL             Document 3          Filed 03/18/25    Page 6 of 21 PageID# 8




                                            COUNT ONE
                            (Conspiracy to Commit Wire and Bank Fraud)

        THE GRAND JURY FURTHER CHARGES THAT:

        20.     Paragraphs 1 through 19, including all subparagraphs, of this Indictment are

realleged and incorporated as if set forth in full here.

        21.     Beginning at least in or about February 2020, and continuing through at least on

or about February 7, 2022, in the Eastern District of Virginia and elsewhere, the defendants.

SHEILA C. BYNUM-COLEMAN (also known as “SHEILA C. COLEMAN”) and RASHAD H.

COLEMAN, did unlawfully and knowingly conspire with each other and others, known and

unknown to the grand jury, to commit offenses contained within Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the

United States Code, to wit:

                    a.   Bank Fraud - to knowingly, and with intent to defraud, execute, and cause

                         the execution of, a scheme and artifice to obtain monies and funds owned

                         by, and under the custody and control of one or more financial institutions,

                         as that term is defined at 18 U.S.C. § 20, including Atlantic Union Bank

                         and Virginia National Bank, by means of false and fraudulent pretenses.

                         representations, and promises relating to a material fact, in violation

                         of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1344(2); and

                    b.   Wire Fraud - to knowingly, and with intent to defraud, devise, and intend

                         to devise, a scheme and artifice to defraud, and to obtain money and

                         property by means of materially false and fraudulent pretenses,

                         representations, and promises, knowing that they were false and fraudulent

                         when made, and transmitting and causing to be transmitted in interstate

                         commerce, by means of wire communication, certain writings, signs.

                                                   6
Case 3:25-cr-00044-MHL            Document 3           Filed 03/18/25    Page 7 of 21 PageID# 9




                       signals, pictures and sounds, for the purpose of executing the scheme and

                       artifice, and affecting a financial institution, in violation of Title 18,

                       United States Code, Section 1343.

                                    Purpose of the Conspiracy


        22.    The purpose of this conspiracy was for B YNUM-COLEMAN and COLEMAN

(collectively, “the defendants”) to unjustly enrich themselves by fraudulently obtaining COVID-

19-related governmental funding to which they were not entitled through filing false and

fraudulent claims for benefits and creating fictitious corporate entities. The purpose of the

conspiracy was also for the defendants to conceal wrongdoing from governmental authorities.

                        The Wavs, Manner, and Means of the Conspiracy


        23.    The ways, manner, and means by which the defendants sought to accomplish the

conspiracy included, but were not limited to, the following:

   A.   Defendants File Fraudulent PPP Ayplications

        24.    It was part of the conspiracy that the defendants submitted false and misleading

PPP loan applications to financial institutions. On each of these applications, the defendants

made knowingly false statements and knowingly false certifications to mislead the financial

institutions, including, but not limited to, the following misrepresentations:

        a.     Providing false and fabricated income, sales, gross receipts, and profit figures for
               the businesses;

        b.     Falsely certifying that the businesses were in operation as of February 15, 2020;
               and


        c.     Falsely certifying that the information submitted on the loan application and the
               information provided in all supporting documents was true and accurate.




                                                   7
Case 3:25-cr-00044-MHL          Document 3        Filed 03/18/25      Page 8 of 21 PageID# 10




        25.     At least nine fraudulent PPP loan applications submitted by the defendants were

approved and funded, resulting in the disbursal of at least $225,000 in proceeds by the financial

institutions.


        26.     As an illustrative example, on or about May 12, 2020, the defendants filed a PPP

loan application with Virginia National Bank in the name of J.C. Bynum Construction LLC, a

business the defendants represented to be a construction business. As supporting documentation

to substantiate the PPP loan application, the defendants prepared and submitted a falsified 2019

IRS Form 1040 Schedule C in the name of COLEMAN purporting to show that J.C. Bynum

Construction LLC had $366,101 in gross income and $305,121 in net profit in 2019, attaching

the fabricated Schedule C to the loan application. In truth, as the defendants well knew, the

defendants never filed this 2019 IRS Form 1040 Schedule C with the IRS. In actuality, the


defendants filed a separate 2019 IRS Form 1040 Schedule C with the IRS for J.C. Bynum

Construction LLC, representing that the business received $236,101 in both gross income and

gross profit; this legitimate 2019 IRS Form 1040 Schedule C further represented that the

business incurred $237,133 in total expenses, resulting in an overall tentative loss in the business

of $1,032. The defendants’ false PPP loan application caused a $62,500 loan disbursement, on or

about May 22, 2020, to an Atlantic Union Bank account ending in -1246, an account controlled

by the defendants.

        27.     As another illustrative example, on or about May 28, 2020, the defendants filed an

application for reinstatement for “R.H. Coleman Enterprises LLC” with the Virginia State

Corporation Commission. Thereafter, on or about February 22, 2021, the defendants filed a PPP

loan application with Atlantic Union Bank in the name of “RH Coleman Enterprises LLC,'

which the defendants purported was a business engaged in real estate investment and consulting.



                                                 8
Case 3:25-cr-00044-MHL          Document 3        Filed 03/18/25      Page 9 of 21 PageID# 11




The application contained the false statements that the company had $100,000 in annual

sales/revenue and had been in operation as of February 15, 2020. The defendants further

represented that the applicant (or owner of the applicant business) was not an owner of any other

business and did not have common management with any other business. As supporting

documentation to substantiate the PPP loan application, BYNUM-COLEMAN and COLEMAN

prepared and submitted a falsified 2020 IRS Form 1040 Schedule C purporting to show that RH

Coleman Enterprises LLC received $104,274 in gross receipts and $104,274 in net profits. In

truth and in fact, as the defendants well knew, the defendants never filed this 2020 IRS Form

1040 Schedule C with the IRS. This false PPP loan application caused a $20,835 loan

disbursement, on or about March 22, 2021, to an Atlantic Union Bank account ending in -8743.

BYNUM-COLEMAN and COLEMAN were the signatories on this bank account.

       28.     As another illustrative example, on or about November 16, 2020, the defendants

submitted articles of organization for a company named “Medina House of Fashion LLC” with

the Commonwealth of Virginia’s State Corporation Commission. Thereafter, on or about April

13, 2021, the defendants filed a PPP loan application with Atlantic Union Bank in the name of

 Medina House of Fashion,” which the defendants purported was a service business. The

application contained a false statement that the company had $89,950 in annual sales/revenue

and that the business had been in operation as of February 15, 2020. As supporting

documentation to substantiate the PPP loan application, the defendants prepared and submitted a

falsified 2020 IRS Form 1040 Schedule C purporting to show that Medina House of Fashion

received $99,860 in gross receipts or sales. In truth and in fact, as the defendants well knew, the

defendants never filed this 2020 IRS Form 1040 Schedule C with the IRS. This false PPP loan


application caused a $18,740 loan disbursement, on or about May 14, 2021, to an Atlantic Union



                                                 9
Case 3:25-cr-00044-MHL         Document 3       Filed 03/18/25      Page 10 of 21 PageID# 12




Bank account ending in -6740. BYNUM-COLEMAN and COLEMAN were the signatories on

this bank account. On or about January 18, 2022, the defendants filed articles of cancellation

with the Virginia State Corporation Commission to close Medina House of Fashion LLC.

       29.     As another illustrative example, on or about January 19, 2021, the defendants

reserved the “Sheila Coleman - Realtor” corporate name with the Virginia State Corporation

Commission (effective until May 19, 2021). Thereafter, on or about February 22, 2021, the

defendants filed a PPP loan application with Atlantic Union Bank in the name of “Sheila

Coleman - Realtor.” The application contained a false statement that the company had $100,000

in annual sales/revenue and that the business had been in operation as of February 15, 2020. The


defendants further represented that the applicant (or owner of the applicant business) was not an

owner of any other business and did not have common management with any other business. As

supporting documentation to substantiate the PPP loan application, the defendants prepared and

submitted a falsified 2020 IRS Form 1040 purporting to show that BYNUM-COLEMAN had

earned $120,200 in taxable income that year. Additionally, the defendants prepared and

submitted a falsified 2019 IRS Form 1040 Schedule C purporting to show that BYNUM-

COLEMAN’s realtor business received $111,000 in gross receipts or sales in the 2019 tax year.

In truth and in fact, as BYNUM-COLEMAN and COLEMAN well knew, both documents were

forged and neither document was filed with the IRS. This false PPP loan application caused a

$20,835 loan disbursement, on or about March 4, 2021, to an Atlantic Union Bank account

ending in -7947. BYNUM-COLEMAN, COLEMAN, and their minor-aged child were the

signatories on this bank account. The defendants never ultimately registered “Sheila Coleman -

Realtor” with the Virginia State Corporation Commission as a corporate entity.




                                                10
Case 3:25-cr-00044-MHL            Document 3     Filed 03/18/25      Page 11 of 21 PageID# 13




       30.     As another illustrative example, on or about January 19, 2021, the defendants

reserved the “Coleman Property Management” corporate name with the Virginia State

Corporation Commission (effective until May 19, 2021). Thereafter, on or about March 16,

2021, the defendants filed a PPP loan application in the name of “Coleman Property

Management,” which the defendants purported was a business engaged in real estate

management, with Atlantic Union Bank. The application contained a false statement that the

company had $106,000 in annual sales/revenue and that the business had been in operation as of

February 15, 2020. As supporting documentation to substantiate the PPP loan application, the

defendants prepared and submitted a falsified 2020 IRS Form 1040 Schedule C purporting to

show that Coleman Property Management received $152,315 in gross receipts and $40,529 in net

profits. In truth and in fact, as the defendants well knew, the defendants never filed this 2020 IRS

Form 1040 Schedule C with the IRS. This false PPP loan application caused a $20,832 loan


disbursement, on or about March 29, 2021, to an Atlantic Union Bank account ending in -5943.

BYNUM-COLEMAN and COLEMAN were the sole signatories on this bank account. The

defendants filed articles of incorporation and articles of cancellation for Coleman Property

Management LLC with the Virginia State Corporation Commission on September 16, 2021, and

January 18, 2022, respectively.

       31.     As another illustrative example, on or about January 19, 2021, the defendants

reserved the “Moda Noir LLC” corporate name with the Virginia State Corporation Commission

(effective until May 19, 2021). Thereafter, on or about April 27, 2021, the defendants filed a PPP

loan application with Atlantic Union Bank in the name of “Moda Noir,” which the defendants

purported was a consulting and clothing business. The application contained a false statement

that the company had $89,950 in annual sales/revenue and that the business had been in



                                                 11
Case 3:25-cr-00044-MHL          Document 3       Filed 03/18/25      Page 12 of 21 PageID# 14




operation as of February 15, 2020. As supporting documentation to substantiate the PPP loan

application, the defendants prepared and submitted a falsified 2020 IRS Form 1040 Schedule C

purporting to show that Moda Noir received $89,950 in gross receipts or sales. In truth and in

fact, as the defendants well knew, the defendants never filed this 2020 IRS Fonn 1040 Schedule

C with the IRS. This false PPP loan application caused a $18,737 loan disbursement, on or about

May 6, 2021, to an Atlantic Union Bank account ending in -0849. BYNUM-COLEMAN and

COLEMAN were the sole signatories on this bank account. The defendants filed articles of

incorporation and articles of cancellation for Moda Noir with the Virginia State Corporation

Commission on May 19, 2021, and January 18, 2022, respectively.

       32.     As another illustrative example, on or about February 22, 2021, the defendants

filed a PPP loan application with Atlantic Union Bank in the name of “Rashad Coleman-Handy

Man Services,” which defendants purported was a repair and maintenance company. The

application contained a false statement that the company had $100,000 in annual sales/revenue

and that the business had been in operation as of February 15, 2020. The defendants further

represented that the applicant (or owner of the applicant business) was not an owner of any other

business and did not have common management with any other business. As supporting

documentation to substantiate the PPP loan application, the defendants prepared and submitted a

falsified 2019 IRS Form 1040 Schedule C purporting to show that Rashad Coleman-Handy Man

Services had $106,000 in net profit and $150,000 in gross receipts or sales. In truth and in fact.

as the defendants well knew, the defendants never filed this 2019 IRS Form 1040 Schedule C

with the IRS. This false PPP loan application caused a $21,250 loan disbursement, on or about

March 18, 2021, to an Atlantic Union Bank account ending in -7947. BYNUM-COLEMAN,

COLEMAN, and their minor-aged child were signatories on this bank account.



                                                 12
Case 3:25-cr-00044-MHL          Document 3       Filed 03/18/25      Page 13 of 21 PageID# 15




       33.     As another illustrative example, on or about March 8, 2021, the defendants

submitted an application to reinstate the existence of Coleman REO Services LLC with the

Commonwealth of Virginia State Corporation Commission. Less than a month later, on or about

April 4, 2021, the defendants filed a PPP loan application with Atlantic Union Bank in the name

of “Coleman REO Services,” which defendants purported was a business engaged in waste

collection. The application contained a false statement that the company had $96,725 in annual

sales/revenue and that the business had been in operation as of February 15, 2020. As supporting

documentation to substantiate the PPP loan application, the defendants prepared and submitted a

falsified 2020 IRS Form 1040 Schedule C purporting to show that Coleman REO Services

received $96,725 in gross receipts or sales. In truth and in fact, as the defendants well knew, the

defendants never filed this 2020 IRS Form 1040 Schedule C with the IRS. This false PPP loan


application caused a $20,832 loan disbursement, on or about May 4, 2021, to an Atlantic Union

Bank account ending in -9448. BYNUM-COLEMAN and COLEMAN were the sole signatories

on this bank account. On or about January 18, 2022, the defendants filed articles of cancellation

with the Virginia State Corporation Commission to close Coleman REO Services.

       34.     As another illustrative example, on or about March 18, 2021, the defendants filed

a second draw PPP loan application with Atlantic Union Bank in the name of J.C. Bynum

Construction LLC. The application contained a false statement that the company had $153,420 in

2020 annual gross receipts. As supporting documentation to substantiate the PPP loan

application, the defendants prepared and submitted a falsified 2020 IRS Form 1040 Schedule C

in the name of COLEMAN purporting to show that J.C. Bynum Construction LLC had $153,420

in 2020 gross receipts or sales, attaching the fabricated Schedule C to the loan application. In

truth, as the defendants well knew, the defendants never filed this 2020 IRS Form 1040 Schedule



                                                 13
Case 3:25-cr-00044-MHL           Document 3       Filed 03/18/25      Page 14 of 21 PageID# 16




C with the IRS. This false PPP loan application caused a $20,832 loan disbursement, on or about

March 18, 2021, to an Atlantic Union Bank account ending in -5780.

   B.   Defendants Submitted False Statements on Pandemic Unemployment Assistance
        Certiifcations


        35.    It was further part of the conspiracy that on or about March 29, 2020, BYNUM-

COLEMAN filed for UI benefits with the VEC. On her UI application, BYNUM-COLEMAN


represented, among other things, that she: (1) last worked on March 16, 2020 but was laid off;

(2) was not currently working part-time for another employer; (3) had not established a business

by forming an LLC or registering a business with the Virginia State Corporation Commission;

and (4) that the information provided was true to the best of her knowledge.

        36.    Thereafter, on or about April 20, 2020, BYNUM-COLEMAN filed an initial

application for PUA benefits with the VEC. On the application, BYNUM-COLEMAN

represented, among other things, that she: (1) was an unemployed worker; (2) had her place of

employment closed because of COVID-19; and (3) all information given on the application was

true and correct. Thereafter, BYNUM-COLEMAN filed multiple recertifications for continued

eligibility for PUA, representing that she was eligible for unemployment benefits from on or

about March 15, 2020 through on or about February 13, 2021. In each such recertification,

BYNUM-COLEMAN certified that in the preceding week, she did not apply for or receive

Paycheck Protection Program funds. As a result of such representations, BYNUM-COLEMAN

received at least $17,562 in UIC funds. Such recertifications contained false representations

because, as BYNUM-COLEMAN well knew, she had applied for and/or received PPP funds for

certain weeks covered by the PUA recertifications:

                   a.    For instance, on or about May 17, 2020, BYNUM-COLEMAN filed a

                         recertification for PUA benefits, certifying that in the week ending on May


                                                  14
Case 3:25-cr-00044-MHL          Document 3       Filed 03/18/25     Page 15 of 21 PageID# 17




                        16, 2020, she had not applied for PPP funds. Yet, on or about May 12,

                        2020, BYNUM-COLEMAN and COLEMAN had applied for PPP funds

                        for J.C. Bynum Construction LLC.

                   b.   As another illustrative instance, on or about June 29, 2020, BYNUM-

                        COLEMAN filed a recertification for PUA benefits, certifying that in the

                        week ending on June 27, 2020, she had not received PPP funds. Yet, on or

                        about June 21, 2020, BYNUM-COLEMAN and COLEMAN had received

                        PPP funds for J.C. Bynum Construction LLC.

       37.     It was part of the conspiracy that on or about March 31, 2020, COLEMAN filed

for UI benefits with the VEC. On his UI application, COLEMAN represented, among other

things, that he: (1) was laid off from “JC Bynum Construction” and last worked on February 28,

2020; (2) was not working part time and was not employed with this employer; (3) was not a

corporate officer or relative of a corporate officer; (4) was not receiving any income from any

other source; and (5) that the information provided was true to the best of his knowledge.

       38.     Thereafter, on or about April 21,2020, COLEMAN filed an initial application for

PUA benefits with the VEC. On the application, COLEMAN represented, among other things.

that he: (1) was an unemployed worker; and (2) all information given on the application was true

and correct. Thereafter, COLEMAN filed multiple recertifications for continued eligibility for

PUA, representing that he was eligible for unemployment benefits from on or about March 15,

2020, through on or about June 13, 2020. In each such recertification, COLEMAN certified that

in the preceding week, he did not apply for or receive Paycheck Protection Program funds. As a

result of such representations, COLEMAN received at least $7,896 in UIC funds. Such

recertifications contained false representations because, as COLEMAN well knew, he had



                                                15
Case 3:25-cr-00044-MHL         Document 3       Filed 03/18/25     Page 16 of 21 PageID# 18




applied for and/or received PPP funds for the weeks covered by the UIC recertifications,

including those set forth in Paragraphs 36(a) and 36(b) above. Additionally, on or about May 12,

2020, as part of filing the PPP application in the name of J.C. Bynum Construction, COLEMAN

signed an attestation that he was the 100% owner and president of J.C. Bynum Construction

LLC, the same company from which he was purportedly laid off according to his representations

to the VEC. Additionally, on or about September 30, 2020, the defendants filed a change in

registered agent for J.C. Bynum Construction LLC with the Virginia State Corporation

Commission, changing the registered agent for the business from COLEMAN to BYNUM-

COLEMAN.


   C. Defendants Spent Fraudulently Obtained PPP Funds on Personal Expenses


       39.    In furtherance of this conspiracy, BYNUM-COLEMAN and COLEMAN

routinely spent fraudulently obtained PPP funds on: (1) paying down their own home loan; (2)

luxury clothing; (3) paying down credit card bills in the name of BYNUM-COLEMAN only; (4)

paying down credit card bills in the name of COLEMAN only; and (5) other personal spending.

       40.    On or about May 29, 2020, roughly one week after the defendants received

$62,500 in fraudulently obtained PPP loans for J.C. Bynum Construction LLC, BYNUM-

COLEMAN transferred $10,000 of these fraudulently obtained PPP funds to an Atlantic Union

Bank account ending in -3144 in the name of “Friends of Sheila for Delegate,” an account for

BYNUM-COLEMAN’s political campaign for the Virginia House of Delegates.

                           Wirin25 in Furtherance of the Conspiracy


       41.    In furtherance of this conspiracy, BYNUM-COLEMAN and COLEMAN

routinely caused wire transactions in interstate commerce between servers outside of Virginia




                                               16
Case 3:25-cr-00044-MHL            Document 3       Filed 03/18/25      Page 17 of 21 PageID# 19




 and servers within the Eastern District of Virginia.

                      (In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1349.)

                                 COUNTS TWO THROUGH TEN
                               (False Statements on Loan Applications)

        THE GRAND JURY FURTHER CHARGES THAT:


        42.      The allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 41 of this Indictment, including

 subparagraphs, are realleged and incorporated as if fully set forth herein.

        43.      On or about the dates indicated in the table below, in the Eastern District of

 Virginia and elsewhere, the defendants SHEILA C. BYNUM-COLEMAN (also known as

  SHEILA C. COLEMAN”) and RASHAD H. COLEMAN, for the purpose of influencing the

 action of financial institutions, in connection with applications for PPP loans, knowingly made

 false statements and reports, and aided and abetted each other and others, known and unknown to

 the grand jury, in the same, as further described below:

              On or
Count
        About Date
                                               Description of False Statements

                                       J.C. Bynum Construction

                         First Draw PPP loan application to Virginia National Bank for J.C. Bynum
                         Construction LLC: (1) falsely representing that the information submitted on
          May 12,
  2
              2020       the loan application (including supporting documents) was true and
                         accurate; and (2) transmitting a fabricated and false 2019 IRS Form 1040
                         Schedule C as supporting justification.


                         Second Draw PPP loan application to Atlantic Union Bank for J.C. Bynum
                         Construction LLC: (1) falsely representing that the information submitted on
                         the loan application (including supporting documents) was true and
  3
         March 18,       accurate; (2) falsely representing that the company had $153,420 in 2020
              2021       annual gross receipts; and (3) transmitting a fabricated and false 2020 IRS
                         Form 1040 Schedule C as supporting justification.




                                                   17
Case 3:25-cr-00044-MHL        Document 3       Filed 03/18/25      Page 18 of 21 PageID# 20




                                  Medina House of Fashion

                     PPP loan application to Atlantic Union Bank for Medina House of Fashion:
                     (1) falsely representing that the information submitted on the loan
                     application (including supporting documents) was true and accurate; (2)
       April 13,
4
         2021        falsely representing that the company had $89,950 in annual sales/revenue;
                     (3) falsely representing that the company was in operation as of February 15,
                     2020; and (4) transmitting a fabricated and false 2020 IRS Form 1040
                     Schedule C as supporting justification.

                                   Sheila Coleman- Realtor


                     PPP loan application to Atlantic Union Bank for Sheila Coleman- Realtor:
                     (1) falsely representing that the information submitted on the loan
                     application (including supporting documents) was true and accurate; (2)
5
     February 22,    falsely representing that the company had $100,000 in annual sales/revenue;
         2021        (3) falsely representing that the company was in operation as of February 15,
                     2020; (4) transmitting a fabricated and false 2019 IRS Form 1040 Schedule
                     C as supporting justification; and (5) transmitting a fabricated and false 2020
                     IRS Form 1040 as supporting justification.

                            Rashad Coleman-Handy Man Services


                     PPP loan application to Atlantic Union Bank for Rashad Coleman-Handy
                     Man Services: (1) falsely representing that the information submitted on the
                     loan application (including supporting documents) was true and accurate; (2)
      February 22,
 6
         2021
                     falsely representing that the company had $100,000 in annual sales/revenue;
                     (3) falsely representing that the company was in operation as of February 15,
                     2020; and (4) transmitting a fabricated and false 2019 IRS Form 1040
                     Schedule C as supporting justification.

                                   RH Coleman Enterprises

                     PPP loan application to Atlantic Union Bank for RH Coleman Enterprises
                     LLC: (1) falsely representing that the information submitted on the loan
                     application (including supporting documents) was true and accurate; (2)
                     falsely representing that the company had $100,000 in annual sales/revenue;
                     (3) falsely representing that the company was in operation as of February 15,
      February 22,
 7
         2021
                     2020; and (4) transmitting a fabricated and false 2020 IRS Form 1040
                     Schedule C as supporting justification.




                                               18
Case 3:25-cr-00044-MHL           Document 3        Filed 03/18/25    Page 19 of 21 PageID# 21




                                       Coleman REO Services


                       PPP loan application to Atlantic Union Bank for Coleman REO Services
                       LLC: (1) falsely representing that the information submitted on the loan
         March 8,
                       application (including supporting documents) was true and accurate; (2)
 8
             2021      falsely representing that the company had $96,725 in annual sales/revenue;
                       (3) falsely representing that the company was in operation as of February 15,
                       2020; and (4) transmitting a fabricated and false 2020 IRS Form 1040
                       Schedule C as supporting justification.

                                  Coleman Property Management

                       PPP loan application to Atlantic Union Bank for Coleman Property
                       Management: (1) falsely representing that the information submitted on the
                       loan application (including supporting documents) was true and accurate; (2)
        March 16,
 9
             2021
                       falsely representing that the company had $106,000 in annual sales/revenue;
                       (3) falsely representing that the company was in operation as of February 15,
                       2020; and (4) transmitting a fabricated and false 2020 IRS Form 1040
                       Schedule C as supporting justification.

                                             Moda Noir


                       PPP loan application to Atlantic Union Bank for Moda Noir LLC: (1) falsely
                       representing that the information submitted on the loan application
                       (including supporting documents) was true and accurate; (2) falsely
10
         April 27,
             2021
                       representing that the company had $89,950 in annual sales/revenue; (3)
                       falsely representing that the company was in operation as of February 15,
                       2020; and (4) transmitting a fabricated and false 2020 IRS Form 1040
                       Schedule C as supporting justification.

                (In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1014 and 2.)

                                         COUNT ELEVEN
               (Engaging in Monetary Transactions in Criminally Derived Property)

       44.      The allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 41 of this Indictment are

realleged and incorporated as if fully set forth herein.

       45.      On or about March 19, 2021, in the Eastern District of Virginia and elsewhere,

SHEILA C. BYNUM-COLEMAN (also known as “SHEILA C. COLEMAN”) and RASHAD H.

COLEMAN, the defendants herein, did knowingly engage and attempt to engage, and aid and

abet each other in engaging, in a monetary transaction by, through and to a financial institution.

                                                  19
Case 3:25-cr-00044-MHL          Document 3       Filed 03/18/25         Page 20 of 21 PageID# 22




affecting interstate commerce, in criminally derived property of a value greater than $10,000,

that is, money deposits which represented fraudulently obtained COVID-19-related PPP loan

proceeds, such property having been derived from a specified unlawful activity, that is False

Statements in Loan Applications (Count 6 of the Indictment), in violation

of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1014 and 2, respectively.

       46.     Property Derivedfrom Speciifed Unlawful Activity (i.e., Count 6):      As outlined

in Paragraphs 32 and Count 6 above, on or about February 22, 2021, the defendants submitted

false statements to Atlantic Union Bank on the PPP loan application for Rashad Coleman-Handy


Man Services. On or about March 18, 2021, the defendants’ false submittal caused Atlantic

Union Bank to deposit $21,250 in fraudulently obtained government-backed loan proceeds to the

defendants’ Atlantic Union Bank account ending in -7947.

       47.     Criminal Monetary Transaction: Thereafter, on or about March 19, 2021, the

defendants initiated a $21,250 transfer from the Atlantic Union Bank account ending in -7947 to

a separate Atlantic Union Bank account ending in -5441. BYNUM-COLEMAN, COLEMAN,

and their minor aged son were all signatories to the Atlantic Union Bank account ending

in -5441.


                (In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1957 & 2.)

                                FORFEITURE ALLEGATION


       Pursuant to 32.2 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the defendant is hereby

notified that upon conviction of any of the offenses charged in Counts One through Ten of this

Indictment, the defendant shall forfeit to the United States any property, real or personal, which

constitutes or is derived from any proceeds traceable to the offense.




                                                20
Case 3:25-cr-00044-MHL            Document 3       Filed 03/18/25         Page 21 of 21 PageID# 23




          The defendant is further notified that upon conviction of any of the offenses charged in

Count Eleven of this Indictment, the defendant shall forfeit to the United States any property,

real or personal, involved in the offense, or any property traceable to the offense. If the property

subject to forfeiture cannot be located, the United States will seek an order forfeiting substitute

assets.


    (In accordance with Title 18, United States Code, Sections 982(a)(1) and 981(a)(1)(C), as
  incorporated by Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461 and Title 21, United States Code,
                                         Section 853(p).)



                                                       A TRUE BILL:


                                                                y?




                                                       FOREPERSON



          ERIK S. SIEBERT
                                                                      Pursuant to the E-Government Act,
          UNITED STATES ATTORNEY                                     the original of this page has been filed
                                                                        under seal in the Clerk’s 0£Qce




By:
          Avi Panth
          Thomas A. Garnett
          Assistant United States Attorneys




                                                  21


File and source

File
3-indictment.pdf
Size
1,644,495 bytes
SHA-256
a9c278df4cab445a3fbe371d8ef1588ad6eb78545756ab8e40e1d240bb0e9cb9
Our copy
3-indictment.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top