Indictment — United States v. Maggie Anne Boler, District of South Carolina (Entry Number 2)

Summary

A grand jury indictment in United States of America v. Maggie Anne Boler, filed February 1, 2022 as Entry Number 2 in No. 3:22-cr-00073-JFA in the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina, Columbia Division. Counts 1-6 charge false claims to the Internal Revenue Service for tax refunds under 18 U.S.C. § 287, listing refunds claimed such as $44,373.00. Count 7 charges a false statement under 18 U.S.C. § 1014, alleging that on or about March 1, 2021 Boler falsely claimed gross receipts and expenses to influence Itria Ventures in approving a Paycheck Protection Program loan. The forfeiture allegation seeks a minimum of $20,833.00. The signature block names United States Attorney Corey F. Ellis.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.

3:22-cr-00073-JFA Date Filed 02/01/22 Entry Number 2 Page 1 of 4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
COLUMBIA DIVISION

18 U.S.C. § 2
18 U.S.C. § 287
18 U.S.C. § 1014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )
)
) 18 U.S.C. § 982(a)(2)
)
)
)
)

28 U.S.C. § 2461(c)

MAGGIE ANNE BOLER INDICTMENT

COUNTS 1-6
THE GRAND JURY CHARGES:

That on or about the dates set forth below, in the District of South Carolina, the Defendant,
MAGGIE ANNE BOLER, made and presented to the Internal Revenue Service claims upon and
against the United States, that is, demands for a tax refunds of knowing that the claims were false,
fictitious, and fraudulent in that the taxpayers did not have withholdings as stated and that the

refunds were not due;

Count | Tax Year Taxpayer Refund Claimed
1 2/13/2016 M.B. $44,373.00

2 2/15/2016 RB. $26,365.00

3 2/14/2016 J.D. $16,918.00

4 2/23/2016 FJ. & Dw. $ 26,356.00

5 3/30/2016 K.L. $ 26,729.00

6 4/19/2016 A.M. $ 18,648.00

In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 287 and 2.

1
3:22-cr-00073-JFA Date Filed 02/01/22 Entry Number 2 Page 2 of 4

COUNT 7
THE GRAND JURY FURTHER CHARGES:

That on or about March 1, 2021, in the District of South Carolina, the Defendant,
MAGGIE ANNE BOLER, knowingly made a false statement and report for the purpose of
influencing the action of Itria Ventures in approving a Paycheck Protection Program loan as
backed by the United States Small Business Administration in connection with an application and
loan, in that the defendant falsely claimed gross receipts and expenses when in truth and in fact,
as the defendant well knew, she did not have those gross receipts and expenses;

All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1014.
3:22-cr-00073-JFA Date Filed 02/01/22 Entry Number 2 Page 3 of 4

FORFEITURE

FALSE STATEMENTS:

Upon conviction for violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1014 as charged in
this Indictment, the Defendant, MAGGIE ANNE BOLER, shall forfeit to the United States any
property, real or personal, constituting, derived from or traceable to proceeds the Defendant
obtained directly or indirectly as a result of such offense.

PROPERTY:
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 982(a)(2), and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), the property subject to
forfeiture includes, but is not limited to, the following:

Cash Proceeds/Forfeiture Judgment:

A sum of money equal to all proceeds the Defendant obtained, directly or
indirectly, from the offense charged in this Indictment, that is. a minimum
of $20,833.00 in United States currency and all interest and proceeds
traceable thereto, and/or that such sum equals all property derived from or
traceable to her violation of 18 U.S.C. §1014.

SUBSTITUTE ASSETS:

If any of the property described above as being subject to forfeiture, as a result of any act

or omission of the Defendant—

(a) cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence;

(b) has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third person;

(c) has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the Court;

(d) has been substantially diminished in value; or

(ec) has been commingled with other property which cannot be subdivided
without difficulty;

it is the intent of the United States, pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p), as
incorporated by 18 U.S.C. § 982(b)(1), to seek forfeiture of any other property of the said

Defendant up to the value of the above described forfeitable property;
3:22-cr-00073-JFA Date Filed 02/01/22 Entry Number 2 Page 4 of 4

Pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 982(a)(2), and Title 28, United States

A Tw /_) BILL

Code, Section 2461(c).

COREY F. ELLIS
UNITED STATES iy

By:

T. DeWayne D3 son, ID No. 10859
Assistant United States Attorney
1441 Main Street, Suite 500
Columbia, South Carolina 29201


File and source

File

2-indictment.pdf

Size

213,063 bytes

SHA-256

b6c815d204fdef27fa098431ea45f10d7b63757dd27bedd789511f4bfb462ff8

Our copy

2-indictment.pdf

Original

archive.org