Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Superseding Indictment — United States v. Kenneth Dodd et al., District of Maryland (Document 4)Search ⌕

Superseding Indictment — United States v. Kenneth Dodd et al., District of Maryland (Document 4)

Summary

A superseding indictment against Kenneth Dodd, Jason Haddox and Jonathan Henry, Criminal No. PWG-21-224, filed December 22, 2021 as Document 4 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland. It states that the defendants were inmates at FCI Fort Dix and used contraband telephones and the Internet from on or about March 22, 2020 through at least June 2021 to file unemployment claims with the Maryland Department of Labor in the names of identity theft victims. It alleges that the claims led to disbursement of more than $1.7 million, including FPUC funds, on Bank of America prepaid debit cards mailed to addresses the conspirators could reach. Count One charges conspiracy under 18 U.S.C. § 1349, Count Two aggravated identity theft under 18 U.S.C. § 1028A(a)(1), and Count Three mail fraud against Henry under 18 U.S.C. § 1341.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Superseding Indictment — United States v. Kenneth Dodd et al., District of Maryland (Document 4).” Original at archive.org. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/indictment-no-1-21-cr-00224-dkt-4-d-md-76661dbaea/, SHA-256 0a5039150a4c81f753addb82f9b807bccdeaa62bc8fc73e3a81d4d1d92bfd550.

Full text

Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.

FILED ENTERED
Fen USAO 2020R00562 LOGGED RECEIVED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DEC 2 2 2021
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
AT GREENBELT
CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
* BY DEPUTY
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA *
*
v. - CRIMINAL NO. PWG-21-224
KENNETH DODD, a (Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud
JASON HADDOX, and a and Mail Fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1349;
JONATHAN HENRY, i Aggravated Identity Theft, 18 U.S.C.
= § 1028A(a)(1); Mail Fraud, 18 U.S.C.
Defendant * § 1341; Aiding and Abetting,

* 18 U.S.C. § 2; Forfeiture, 18 U.S.C.
* § 981(a)(1)(C), 21 U.S.C. § 853, 28
* U.S.C. § 2461(c))

SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT

COUNT ONE
(Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud and Mail Fraud)

The Grand Jury for the District of Maryland charges that:
Introduction

At all times relevant to this Indictment:

I. Defendants KENNETH DODD (“DODD”), JASON HADDOX (“HADDOX”),
and JONATHAN HENRY (“HENRY”) were inmates at the Federal Correctional Institution,
Fort Dix (“FCI Fort Dix”), which is operated by the Federal Bureau of Prisons.

ps Victim 1 and Victim 2 were identity theft victims whose personal identifying
information (“PII”), including their names and Social Security numbers, was used without their
knowledge or authorization to submit fraudulent claims for, and to obtain, unemployment
compensation, as alleged herein.

3 The Maryland Department of Labor (“MD DOL”) was an agency of the State of
Case 1:21-cr-00224-DKC Document 4 Filed 12/22/21 Page 2 of 9

Maryland responsible for the administration of Maryland’s unemployment insurance system,
processing applications for unemployment benefits, and disbursing unemployment compensation
to individuals entitled to benefits.

4. MD DOL received applications for unemployment benefits through the Internet. In
the application, the applicant was required to provide, among other things, the applicant’s mailing
address and PII about the applicant to include the applicant’s name and Social Security number.
If, based upon the information provided in the application, MD DOL determined that the applicant
was entitled to unemployment benefits, Bank of America (“BOA”), pursuant to a contract with
MD DOL, created a BOA prepaid VISA debit card in the applicant’s name and mailed the card to
the mailing address provided in the application. The debit card would provide access to funds held
in a financial account for the purpose of compensating for the applicant’s approved unemployment
status.

5. The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (“CARES”) Act was signed
into law on March 27, 2020, in response to the outbreak of the novel coronavirus known as
COVID-19 and the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. The CARES Act established
the Federal Pandemic Unemployment Compensation (“FPUC”) program. The FPUC program
allowed MD DOL and other state workforce agencies to provide an additional $600 per week to
individuals entitled to receive regular unemployment insurance benefits. The FPUC program was

effective from March 29, 2020, through July 31, 2020.
Case 1:21-cr-00224-DKC Document 4 Filed 12/22/21 Page 3 of 9

The Conspiracy and the Scheme to Defraud

6. From on or about March 22, 2020 through at least in or about June 2021, in the

District of Maryland and elsewhere, the defendants,
KENNETH DODD,
JASON HADDOX, and
JONATHAN HENRY,
knowingly and willfully conspired and agreed with each other and with others known and
unknown to the Grand Jury:

a. to commit wire fraud, that is, to knowingly devise and intend to devise a
scheme and artifice to defraud, and to obtain money and property by means of false and fraudulent
pretenses, representations, promises, and material omissions (the “scheme to defraud”), and, for
the purpose of executing and attempting to execute the scheme to defraud, did cause to be
transmitted by means of wire communication in interstate commerce, any writings, signs, signals,
pictures, and sounds, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343; and

b. to commit mail fraud, that is, to devise and intend to devise a scheme and
artifice to defraud and to obtain money and property by means of false and fraudulent pretenses,
representations, promises, and material omissions (the “scheme to defraud”), and, for the purpose
of executing and attempting to execute the scheme to defraud, to cause to be placed in any post
office or authorized depository for mail matter, any matter and thing whatever to be sent or
delivered by the United States Postal Service (“USPS”), and deposit and cause to be deposited any
matter and thing whatever to be sent or delivered by any private or commercial interstate carrier,
and to take and receive therefrom any such matter and thing, and to cause to be delivered by the

USPS according to the direction thereon , and at the place at which it is addressed, in violation of

18 U.S.C. § 1341.
Case 1:21-cr-00224-DKC Document 4 Filed 12/22/21 Page 4 of 9

Object of the Conspiracy and Scheme to Defraud

Vs It was the object of the conspiracy and scheme to defraud to obtain money and
other property by submitting via the Internet false applications in the names of identity theft
victims claiming unemployment benefits to which the defendants and other members of the
conspiracy were not entitled, causing the issuance of prepaid debit cards in the victims’ names
and the mailing of those cards to locations accessible to the defendants and other members of the
conspiracy, and using the cards to withdraw money and to conduct retail transactions.

Manner and Means of the Conspiracy and the Scheme to Defraud

It was part of the conspiracy and scheme to defraud that:

8. The defendants and their co-conspirators obtained the PII of individual victims,
including Victim | and Victim 2 (“identity theft victims”).

5. The defendants and their co-conspirators identified addresses of locations
accessible to them, which could be used to receive prepaid debit cards by mail.

10... The defendants and their co-conspirators used contraband telephones and the
Internet to initiate, complete, and submit fraudulent applications for unemployment benefits in the
names of identity theft victims, including Victim | and Victim 2, to MD DOL.

11. The defendants and their co-conspirators falsely used the PII of identity theft
victims in the fraudulent applications claiming unemployment compensation, falsely verifying that
the applicants were the identity theft victims.

12. The defendants and their co-conspirators listed the addresses of locations accessible
to them as mailing addresses in the fraudulent applications, including addresses located in
Maryland.

13. Based upon information provided in the fraudulent applications, MD DOL
Case 1:21-cr-00224-DKC Document 4 Filed 12/22/21 Page 5 of 9

approved disbursement of unemployment compensation totaling more than $1.7 million, including
FPUC funds, and caused BOA to issue prepaid debit cards in the names of identity theft victims,
including Victim | and Victim 2.

14. Based upon information provided in the fraudulent applications, MD DOL caused
the prepaid debit cards to be mailed to locations designated as mailing addresses by the defendants
and their co-conspirators in the fraudulent applications they submitted to MD DOL.

15. The defendants and their co-conspirators obtained and caused to be obtained the
prepaid debit cards issued in the names of identity theft victims, including Victim | and Victim 2,
under false pretenses.

16. | The defendants’ co-conspirators used the prepaid debit cards to withdraw money

from automated teller machines and to make retail purchases.

18 U.S.C. § 1349
Case 1:21-cr-00224-DKC Document 4 Filed 12/22/21 Page 6 of 9

COUNT TWO
(Aggravated Identity Theft)

The Grand Jury for the District of Maryland further charges that:
l. Paragraphs | through 5 and 7 through 16 of Count One of this Superseding
Indictment are incorporated here.
2. From on or about March 22, 2020 through at least in or about June 2021, in the
District of Maryland and elsewhere, the defendants,
KENNETH DODD,

JASON HADDOX, and
JONATHAN HENRY,

during and in relation to a felony violation enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 1028A(c)—that is a
violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349 as charged in Count One of this Superseding Indictment and
incorporated here—knowingly transferred, possessed, and used, without lawful authority, a
means of identification of another person, knowing that the means of identification belonged to

another person, that is, debit cards bearing the names of Victim | and Victim 2.

18 U.S.C. § 1028A(a)(1)
18 U.S.C. §2
Case 1:21-cr-00224-DKC Document 4 Filed 12/22/21 Page 7 of 9

COUNT THREE
(Mail Fraud)

The Grand Jury for the District of Maryland further charges that:

1. Paragraphs | through 5 and 7 through 16 of Count One of this Superseding
Indictment are incorporated here.

Qe On or about June 10, 2020, in the District of Maryland and elsewhere, the
defendant,

JONATHAN HENRY,

for the purpose of executing and attempting to execute the scheme to defraud and to obtain
money by means of materially false and fraudulent pretenses, did knowingly cause to be
delivered by mail and by private and commercial interstate carrier according to the direction
thereon any matter and thing, namely, a prepaid VISA debit card, issued by Bank of America
using the name of Victim 1, delivered by the United States Postal Service to an address in

Baltimore, Maryland.

18 U.S.C. § 1341
Case 1:21-cr-00224-DKC Document 4 Filed 12/22/21 Page 8 of 9

FORFEITURE ALLEGATION

The Grand Jury for the District of Maryland further finds that:

L Pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.2, notice is hereby given to the
defendant that the United States will seek forfeiture as part of any sentence in accordance with
18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), in the event of the defendants’ convictions on
Count One or Count Three of this Superseding Indictment.

Wire and Mail Fraud Forfeiture

Bi Upon conviction of any of the offenses set forth in Count One and Count Three,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), the defendants,
KENNETH DODD,
JASON HADDOX, and
JONATHAN HENRY,
shall forfeit to the United States any property, real or personal, which constitutes or is derived

from proceeds traceable to such offense.

Substitute Assets

Dm If, as a result of any act or omission of the defendants, any of the property

described above as being subject to forfeiture:

a. cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence;

b. has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third person;

c. has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the Court;

d. has been substantially diminished in value; or,

é, has been commingled with other property which cannot be subdivided

without difficulty,
Case 1:21-cr-00224-DKC Document 4 Filed 12/22/21 Page 9 of 9

the United States of America, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(p) as incorporated by 28 U.S.C.

§ 2461(c), shall be entitled to forfeiture of substitute property up to the value of the forfeitable

property.

18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1(C)
21 U.S.C. § 853
28 U.S.C. § 2461(c)

A TRUE BILL:

SIGNATURE REDACTED

Forepers

Erek L. Barron
United States Attorney

Date: December 22, 2021


File and source

File
4-indictment.pdf
Size
3,415,948 bytes
SHA-256
0a5039150a4c81f753addb82f9b807bccdeaa62bc8fc73e3a81d4d1d92bfd550
Our copy
4-indictment.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top