Superseding Indictment — United States v. Travis C. Crosby, Northern District of Georgia (Document 125)
Summary
A superseding criminal indictment in United States v. Travis C. Crosby, No. 1:21-cr-00011-LMM-CCB, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, filed in open court January 4, 2022 as Document 125. The grand jury charges conspiracy to commit bank fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1349, bank fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1344, a false statement to a federally insured bank under 18 U.S.C. § 1014, and money laundering under 18 U.S.C. § 1956. It alleges that an SBA Form 2483 PPP loan application submitted May 16, 2020 for Faithful Transport Services, LLC, with IRS Forms 941 reporting $358,819.00 in wages to 16 employees, obtained a $300,000 PPP loan from Financial Institution 1. The forfeiture section lists $88,298.05 in funds from a Faithful Transport Services LLC account at BB&T Bank.
Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Superseding Indictment — United States v. Travis C. Crosby, Northern District of Georgia (Document 125).”
Original at ecf.gand.uscourts.gov. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/indictment-no-1-21-cr-00011-dkt-125-n-d-ga-0dc1df8a6f/
, SHA-256 ded8b1d2f9fe2eb0740b547d7ff2f281eaf01316400018ef604fd6e9153eec8b.Full text
Case 1:21-cr-00011-LMM-CCB Document 125 Filed 01/04/22 Page 1 of 14
FILED IN OPEN COURT
U.S.0.C. -Atlanta
JAN - 4 2022
KEVIN P. WEIMER
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT By: Wvepufy~::rk
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
ATLANTA DIVISION
UNITED ST ATES OF AMERICA
V. Superseding Criminal Indictment
TRAVIS C . CROSBY No. 1:21-CR-00011-LMM-CCB
THE GRAND JURY CHARGES THAT:
Background
At times relevant to this Superseding Indictment:
The Defendant and Related Entity
1. The defendant, TRAVIS C. CROSBY ("CROSBY"), was an
individual residing in the District of South Carolina who claimed sole ownership
of Faithful Transport Services, LLC ("Faithful"), a South Carolina Limited
Liability Company.
The Defendant's Co-Conspirator and Other Relevant Individuals
2. Rodericque Jarmaine Thompson a / k/ a Rodriquez Thompson
a/k / a Rodricque Thomas a / k/ a Jammige Troy Thomason a / k/ a Jammie
Troy Thompson a / k/ a Junior Thompson ("Thompson" ) was an individual
residing in the Northern District of Georgia.
3. Micah K. Baisden ("Baisden") was an individual residing in the
Northern District of Georgia who claimed sole ownership of PowerHouse Sports
Academy, LLC ("PowerHouse"), a Georgia Limited Liability Company.
Case 1:21-cr-00011-LMM-CCB Document 125 Filed 01/04/22 Page 2 of 14
4. Keith A . Maloney, Jr. ("Maloney") was an individual residing in
the District of South Carolina who claimed sole ownership of KMJ Transport,
LLC ("KMJ"), a South Carolina Limited Liability Company.
5. Tabronx W. Smith ("Smith") was an individual residing in the
Northern District of Georgia who claimed sole ownership of Market Yourself,
LLC ("Market Yourself"), a Georgia Limited Liability Company.
6. Thomas D. Wilson ("Wilson") was an individual residing in the
Northern District of Georgia who claimed sole ownership of Rare Breed Nation,
LLC ("Rare Breed"), a Georgia Limited Liability Company.
7. Antonio D. Hosey ("Hosey") was an individual residing in the
Northern District of Georgia.
The Small Business Administration
8. The United States Small Business Administration ("SBA") was an
executive branch agency of the United States government that provided support
to entrepreneurs and small businesses. The mission of the SBA was to maintain
and strengthen the nation's economy by enabling the establishment and viability
of small businesses and by assisting in the economic recovery of communities
after disasters.
9. As part of this effort, the SBA enabled and provided for loans
through banks, credit unions, and other lenders. These loans had government-
backed guarantees.
2
Case 1:21-cr-00011-LMM-CCB Document 125 Filed 01/04/22 Page 3 of 14
The Paycheck Protection Program
10. The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security ("CARES") Act
was a federal law enacted in or about March 2020 and was designed to provide
emergency financial assistance to the millions of Americans who are suffering
the economic effects caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.
11. One source of relief that the CARES Act provided for was the
authorization of up to $349 billion in forgivable loans to small businesses for
payroll, mortgage interest, rent/ lease, and utilities, through a program referred
to as the Paycheck Protection Program ("PPP"). In April 2020, Congress
authorized up to $310 billion in additional PPP funding.
12. The PPP allowed qualifying small businesses and other
organizations to receive PPP loans. Businesses must use PPP loan proceeds for
payroll costs, interest on mortgages, rent, and utilities. The PPP allowed the
interest and principal on the PPP loan to be entirely forgiven if the business spent
the loan proceeds on these expense items within a designated period of time and
used a certain percentage of the PPP loan proceeds for payroll expenses.
13. The amount of a PPP loan that a small business may have been
entitled to receive was determined by the number of employees employed by the
business and the business's average monthly payroll costs.
14. In order to obtain a PPP loan, a qualifying business was required to
submit a PPP loan application, which was signed by an authorized
representative of the business. The PPP loan application required the business
(through its authorized representative) to acknowledge the program rules and
3
Case 1:21-cr-00011-LMM-CCB Document 125 Filed 01/04/22 Page 4 of 14
make certain affirmative certifications in order to be eligible to obtain the PPP
loan. In the PPP loan application, the small business (through its authorized
representative) had to state, among other things, its (a) average monthly payroll
expenses and (b) number of employees. These figures were used to calculate the
amount of money the small business was eligible to receive under the PPP. In
addition, businesses applying for a PPP loan had to provide documentation
showing their payroll expenses.
15. The SBA oversaw the PPP. However, individual PPP loans were
issued by private, approved lenders who received and processed PPP
applications and supporting documentation, and then made loans using the
lenders' own funds, which were 100% guaranteed by the SBA. Data from the
application, including information about the borrower, the total amount of the
loan, and the listed number of employees, was transmitted by the lender to the
SBA in the course of processing the loan.
Other Relevant Entities
16. Financial Institution 1 was a financial institution headquartered in
Fort Lee, New Jersey that was insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation ("FDIC"). Financial Institution 1 participated in the PPP as a lender,
and as such, was authorized to lend funds to eligible borrowers under the terms
of the PPP.
17. Financial Institution 2 was an FDIC-insured financial institution
headquartered in Salt Lake City, Utah. Financial Institution 2 participated in the
4
Case 1:21-cr-00011-LMM-CCB Document 125 Filed 01/04/22 Page 5 of 14
PPP as a lender, and as such, was authorized to lend funds to eligible borrowers
under the terms of the PPP.
18. Company 1 paired PPP applicants with lenders by collecting
applications, performing underwriting tasks, and submitting approved
applications to SBA-approved lenders such as Financial Institutions 1 and 2 for
funding.
19. Bank 1 was an FDIC-insured financial institution based in San
Francisco, California with branches throughout the United States.
20. Bank 2 was an FDIC-insured financial institution based in Charlotte,
North Carolina with branches throughout the United States.
21. Bank 3 was an FDIC-insured financial institution based in Vienna,
Virginia with branches throughout the United States.
22. Bank 4 was an FDIC-insured financial institution based in Charlotte,
North Carolina with branches throughout the United States.
The Scheme to Fraudulently Obtain PPP Loans
23. Thompson recruited CROSBY, Baisden, Maloney, Wilson, Smith,
and others known and unknown to the Grand Jury, to fraudulently obtain PPP
loans that they were not eligible to receive.
24. Under Thompson's direction, CROSBY, Baisden, Maloney,
Wilson, and Smith, each knowingly submitted, and assisted in the submission
of, SBA Form 2483 PPP Loan Applications to Financial Institutions 1 and 2,
through Company 1, that Thompson had partially completed, bearing their
5
Case 1:21-cr-00011-LMM-CCB Document 125 Filed 01/04/22 Page 6 of 14
respective signatures, and containing false and fraudulent information about
their respective businesses, as set forth in the chart below:
Amount of # of Monthly
Approx. Date
Def endantfBusiness Loan Employees Payroll Lender
of Submission
Requested Indicated Indicated
Financial
Maloney/ KMJ May 4, 2020 $300,000 16 $120,000
Institution 1
Financial
Smith/Market Yourself May 6, 2020 $300,000 16 $120,000
Institution 2
Financial
Wilson/Rare Breed May 8, 2020 $300,000 16 $120,000
Institution 1
Financial
CROSBY /Faithful May 16, 2020 $300,000 16 $120,000
Institution 1
Financial
Baisden/ Powerhouse May 20, 2020 $300,000 16 $120,000
Institution 1
25. As set forth in the chart below, included with each loan
application was a false and fraudulent IRS Form 941 (Employer's
Quarterly Federal Tax Returns) for each business, which falsely
reflected that the business had paid wages, tips, and other compensation
of $358,819.00 to 16 employees in the quarter(s) indicated.
Ql 2019 Q2 2019 Q3 2019 Q42019
DefendantfBusiness
Jan- Mar Apr-Jun Jul- Sep Oct- Dec
Maloney/ KMJ $358,819.00 $358,819.00 $358,819.00 $358,819.00
Smith/Market Yourself N/A $358,819.00 N/A N/A
Wilson/Rare Breed N/A $358,819.00 N/A N/A
CROSBY /Faithful $358,819.00 N/A N/A N/A
Baisden/ Powerhouse $358,819.00 $358,819.00 $358,819.00 N/A
26. Based on the false and fraudulent representations and submissions
in the PPP loan applications, the IRS Forms 941 (Employer's Quarterly Federal
6
Case 1:21-cr-00011-LMM-CCB Document 125 Filed 01/04/22 Page 7 of 14
Tax Returns), and other supporting documentation submitted by CROSBY,
Baisden, Maloney, Wilson, and Smith, with Thompson's assistance and
direction, Financial Institutions 1 and 2 funded the requested PPP loans as
follows:
Approximate Date Amount of PPP Location of
Defendant/Business
Funded Loan Deposit Account
Maloney /KMJ May 4, 2020 $300,000 Bank3
Smith/Market Yourself May 6, 2020 $300,000 Bank3
Wilson/Rare Breed May 8, 2020 $300,000 Bank4
CROSBY /Faithful May 19, 2020 $300,000 Bank2
Baisden/ PowerHouse May 20, 2020 $300,000 Bankl
27. CROSBY, Baisden, Maloney, Wilson, and Smith agreed to pay
Thompson a percentage of the loan amount, after the funds were deposited into
their respective businesses' checking accounts at Banks 1-4.
28. After the PPP loan funds were deposited in their respective
businesses' checking accounts at Banks 1-4, CROSBY, Baisden, Maloney,
Wilson, and Smith used the PPP loan funds for non-qualifying, non-
business-related purposes, including by making checks out to individuals
who did not work for their respective businesses, in violation of the terms of the
PPP loan program.
7
Case 1:21-cr-00011-LMM-CCB Document 125 Filed 01/04/22 Page 8 of 14
Count One
Conspiracy to Commit Bank Fraud
18 U.S.C. § 1349
29. The Grand Jury re-alleges and incorporates by reference the factual
allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 28 of this Superseding Indictment
as if fully set forth herein.
30. From in or about March 2020 through in or about June 2020, in the
Northern District of Georgia and elsewhere, CROSBY and Thompson did
knowingly and willfully combine, conspire, confederate, agree, and have a tacit
understanding with each other and with others known and unknown to the
Grand Jury, to execute a scheme and artifice to defraud a financial institution, the
deposits of which were insured by the FDIC, and to obtain money, funds, and
credits owned by and under the custody and control of the aforementioned
financial institution by means of materially false and fraudulent pretenses,
representations, and promises and by the omission of material facts, in violation
of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1344.
Object of the Conspiracy
31. The object of the conspiracy was for CROSBY, Thompson, and
others to fraudulently obtain a PPP loan, and to conceal the conspiracy.
Manner and Means
32. The manner and means by which CROSBY, Thompson, and others
sought to accomplish the object of the conspiracy included, among others, the
following:
8
Case 1:21-cr-00011-LMM-CCB Document 125 Filed 01/04/22 Page 9 of 14
33. CROSBY and Thompson conspired to submit and cause to be
submitted false and fraudulent documents, including an SBA Form 2483 PPP
Loan Application and IRS Form 941 (Quarterly Federal Tax Returns), to Financial
Institution 1 to obtain a $300,000 PPP loan for Faithful.
34. As a result of and based on CROSBY and Thompson's false
representations and certifications and falsified supporting documents, Financial
Institution 1, a federally insured lender, issued a $300,000 PPP loan to Faithful.
35. CROSBY and Thompson further conspired to use the PPP loan
funds for non-business expenses, including by making payments to themselves
and individuals who did not work for Faithful, in violation of the terms of the
PPP loan agreement.
All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1349.
Count Two
Bank Fraud
18 U.S.C. § 1344 and§ 2
36. The Grand Jury re-alleges and incorporates by reference the factual
allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 28 of this Superseding Indictment
as if fully set forth herein.
37. On or about the date set forth in the chart below, in the Northern
District of Georgia and elsewhere, CROSBY, Thompson, and others known
and unknown to the Grand Jury, did knowingly execute and attempt to execute a
scheme and artifice to defraud Financial Institution 1, the deposits of which were
then insured by the FDIC, and to obtain, by means of materially false and
fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises, and by omission of material
9
Case 1:21-cr-00011-LMM-CCB Document 125 Filed 01/04/22 Page 10 of 14
facts, certain moneys, funds, credits, assets, secu rities, and other property owned
by and under the custody and control of Financial Institution 1.
Defendant Approximate Date
Count Act of Execution
(Business) of Execution
CROSBY Submission of PPP Loan
2 May 16, 2020
(Faithful) Application
All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1344 and Section 2.
Count Three
False Statement to a Federally Insured Bank
18 U.S.C. § 1014 and§ 2
38. The Grand Jury re-alleges and incorporates by reference the factual
allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 28 of this Superseding Indictment
as if fully set forth herein.
39. On or about the date set forth in the chart below, in the North ern
District of Georgia and elsewhere, CROSBY, Thompson, and others, known
and unknown to the Grand Jury, knowingly made, and caused to be made, a
false statement for the purpose of influencing the actions of Financial Institution
1, a financial institution the accounts of which were insured by the FDIC, in
connection with a PPP loan application, as follows:
Count Defendant Approx. False Statement
Date
3 CROSBY May 16, False statements in the PPP Borrower Application Form
2020 and other documents submitted with the Faithful loan
application
All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1014 and Section 2.
10
Case 1:21-cr-00011-LMM-CCB Document 125 Filed 01/04/22 Page 11 of 14
Count Four
Money Laundering
18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(l)(B)(i) and§ 2
40. The Grand Jury re-alleges and incorporates by reference the factual
allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 28 of this Superseding Indictment
as if fully set forth herein.
41. On or about the dates set forth in the chart below, in the Northern
District of Georgia and elsewhere, CROSBY, Thompson, and others known and
unknown to the Grand Jury, knowingly conducted and attempted to conduct a
financial transaction affecting interstate commerce, which involved the proceeds
of a specified unlawful activity, that is, bank fraud, in violation of Title 18,
United States Code, Section 1344, knowing that the transaction was designed in
whole and in part to conceal and disguise the nature, location, source,
ownership, and control of the proceeds of specified unlawful activity, and while
conducting and attempting to conduct such financial transaction knowing that
the property involved in the financial transaction represented the proceeds of
some form of unlawful activity:
Count Defendant Approx. Date Description of Transaction
4 CROSBY May 20, 2020 Check number 1100, in the amount of $8,333.33, bearing
Crosby's signature made out to an individual who did
not work for defendant's company was cashed at a bank
in the Northern District of Georgia
All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1956(a)(l)(B)(i) and
Section 2.
11
Case 1:21-cr-00011-LMM-CCB Document 125 Filed 01/04/22 Page 12 of 14
Forfeiture
Upon conviction of one or more of the offenses alleged in Counts One
through Three of this Indictment, the defendant, CROSBY, shall forfeit to the
United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Sections 982(a)(2), any
property constituting, or derived from, proceeds the person obtained directly or
indirectly as the result of such violation, including but not limited to the
following:
(a) MONEY JUDGMENT: A sum of money in United States currency,
representing the amount of proceeds obtained as a result of the
offenses alleged in Counts One through Two of this Superseding
Indictment.
(b) FUNDS:
1. $88,298.05 in funds from Bank Account Number ending 2822
held in the name of Faithful Transport Services LLC, at BB&T
Bank, Atlanta, Georgia (20-FBI-004611);
Upon conviction of the offense alleged in Count Four of this Superseding
Indictment, the defendant, CROSBY, shall forfeit to the United States, pursuant
to Title 18, United States Code, Sections 982(a)(l), any property, real or personal,
involved in such offense, or any property traceable to such property, including
but not limited to the following:
(a) MONEY JUDGMENT: A sum of money in United States currency,
representing the amount of proceeds obtained as a result of the
12
Case 1:21-cr-00011-LMM-CCB Document 125 Filed 01/04/22 Page 13 of 14
offenses alleged in Counts One through Two of this Superseding
Indictment.
(b) FUNDS:
1. $88,298.05 in funds from Bank Account Number ending 2822
held in the name of Faithful Transport Services LLC, at BB&T
Bank, Atlanta, Georgia (20-FBI-004611);
If, as a result of any act or omission of the defendant, any property subject to
forfeiture:
(a) cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence;
(b) has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third party;
(c) has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the Court;
(d) has been substantially diminished in value; or
(e) has been commingled with other property which cannot be divided
without difficulty;
the United States intends, pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section
853(p), as incorporated by Title 18, United States Code, Section 982(b)(l), to seek
13
Case 1:21-cr-00011-LMM-CCB Document 125 Filed 01/04/22 Page 14 of 14
forfeiture of any other property of the defendant up to the value of the forfeitable
property.
A - l,rv..£,_ BILL
KURT R. ERSKINE
United States Attorney
CH~zt~-B
__
E
R
___
Assistant United States Attorney
Georgia Bar No. 545627
600 U.S. Courthouse
75 Ted Turner Drive SW
Atlanta, GA 30303
404-581-6000;Fax:404-581-6181
JOSEPH BEEMSTERBOER
Acting Chief, Fraud Section
U.S. Department of Justice
MATTHEW REILLY
Trial Attorney, Fraud Section
U.S. Department of Justice
N .Y. Bar No. 5130935
1400 New York Ave, NW
Bond Building, 3rd Floor
Washington, DC 20005
202-320-8523; Fax: 202-514-3708
14
File and source
- File
- 125-indictment-second-indictment-filed-2022-01.pdf
- Size
- 4,147,728 bytes
- SHA-256
- ded8b1d2f9fe2eb0740b547d7ff2f281eaf01316400018ef604fd6e9153eec8b
- Original
- PACER (login required)