12 million people have likely lost employer-sponsored health insurance since February
Summary
An EPI press release dated August 26, 2020 says job losses since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic have been consistent with roughly 6.2 million workers losing access to health insurance they previously got through their own employer. It attributes the finding to a new paper by EPI Director of Research Josh Bivens and economist Ben Zipperer. The release says that, counting spouses and dependents, closer to 12 million people have been cut off from employer-sponsored insurance (ESI) coverage. It says public insurance, mostly Medicaid, has not expanded enough to absorb everyone who lost job-based coverage, and that Medicaid rolls have likely expanded by more than 4 million since the COVID-19 shock began.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“12 million people have likely lost employer-sponsored health insurance since February.”
Original at docs.house.gov. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/hhrg-116-vc00-20200901-sd406-0c574b377c40-33df64bd96/
, SHA-256 0c574b377c402623d0d67c5f2df40fdf78294896990bb67818297ef5dd55c459.Full text
News from EPI
12 million people have likely lost
employer-sponsored health insurance
since February
Policymakers should work to delink jobs and access to
insurance coverage by expanding public options
Press Releases • August 26, 2020
Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and shock to the economy, job losses have been consistent
with roughly 6.2 million workers losing access to health insurance that they previously got through their
own employer. This is the finding in a new paper by EPI Director of Research Josh Bivens and
economist Ben Zipperer that surveys the limited data available to infer changes in health insurance
coverage since the COVID-19 shock began. For each person who is covered under their own employer’s
plan, roughly two people on average are covered through employer-sponsored insurance (ESI) once
spouses and dependents are included. This means that closer to 12 million people have been cut off from
ESI coverage due to job losses in recent months.
“Because most U.S. workers rely on their employer or a family member’s employer for health insurance,
the shock of the coronavirus has cost millions of Americans their jobs and their access to health care in
the midst of a public health catastrophe,” said Bivens. “Tying health insurance to the labor market is
always terribly inefficient and problematic, but becomes particularly so during times of great labor
market churn.”
The authors explain that not every worker who loses ESI through their own employer necessarily loses
all access to health insurance coverage. Some workers formerly covered by their own employer could
purchase continuation of benefits coverage (COBRA) or could be picked up on partners’ or parents’ ESI
plans. By far the biggest shock absorber responding to the loss of ESI has been expansions of public
health insurance rolls, which have clearly begun swelling in recent months. However, public insurance
(mostly Medicaid) has not expanded enough to absorb everyone who lost job-based coverage. Medicaid
rolls, for example, have likely expanded by more than 4 million since the COVID-19 shock began.
Delinking access to health insurance and specific jobs should be a top policy priority for the long term.
The most ambitious and transformational way to sever this link is to make the federal government the
payer of first resort for all health care expenses—a “single payer” plan like Medicare for All. Smaller,
intermediate steps could lower the age of eligibility for Medicare, raise the income thresholds for /
Medicaid eligibility, and/or incorporate into the Affordable Care Act marketplace exchanges a public
option that enrolls all workers without job-based insurance— or even those with access to ESI if they
prefer the public option. Policymakers could also require that employers either provide comprehensive
and affordable insurance or pay a fee to help cover the costs of enrolling their workers in the public
option. At a minimum, policymakers concerned about Americans’ health security should have the federal
government pay for all testing and treatment for COVID-19 related expenses in coming months.
“The coronavirus pandemic has exposed how incomplete and threadbare the U.S. safety net and social
insurance system is,” said Zipperer. “In order to help millions of Americans during the pandemic and
beyond, policymakers must take swift action to address the inequities and inefficiencies in our health
care system.”
/
File and source
- File
- hhrg-116-vc00-20200901-sd406-0c574b377c40.pdf
- Size
- 96,676 bytes
- SHA-256
- 0c574b377c402623d0d67c5f2df40fdf78294896990bb67818297ef5dd55c459
- Original
- docs.house.gov