Government’s Response in Opposition to Defendant’s “Emergency” Motion to Delay Self-Report Date — United States v. Ernest P. Ricci, No. 23-CR-34-JJM-PAS (Dkt. 86, D.R.I.)
Summary
The government's response in opposition to Ernest P. Ricci's "Emergency" Motion to postpone the date to self-report for a prison sentence (ECF No. 85), in United States v. Ernest P. Ricci, Case No. 23-CR-34-JJM-PAS, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island, signed by Assistant U.S. Attorney John P. McAdams with a certificate of service dated July 9, 2024. It cites an earlier emergency release motion on the same medical condition (ECF No. 27) and temporary release granted on April 28, 2023. It says surgery scheduled for June 26, 2024 was cancelled, that on July 2 Ricci moved back into a North Kingston residence and told an FBI agent the surgery was postponed over insurance, and that the motion came less than 48 hours before the report date. It says FMC Devens can meet the medical needs and asks the Court to deny the motion.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Case No. 23-CR-34-JJM-PAS
v.
ERNEST P. RICCI
GOVERNMENT’S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO
DEFENDANT’S “EMERGENCY” MOTION TO DELAY SELF-REPORT DATE
The United States opposes the Defendant Ernest P. Ricci’s “Emergency” Motion
to postpone the date to self-report for his prison sentence (ECF No. 85). The motion’s
filing on the eve of his report date was as predictable as the sun rising in the east. It is
nothing more than the latest cynical attempt by Ricci to avoid accountability for his
criminal conduct and should be denied.
This is not the first time Ricci has attempted to manipulate the Court via his
medical condition. After being detained pretrial for multiple violations of the
conditions of his release, Ricci filed a similar “Emergency Motion for Release from
Custody” based on the same medical condition (ECF No. 27.) As noted in the
government’s sentencing memorandum (ECF No. 75), Ricci drafted a letter to the Court
purportedly from his physician son and pressured his son to put it on military
letterhead sign it; the letter was later submitted to the Court (without the military
letterhead).
Over the government’s opposition, on April 28, 2023, the Court granted Ricci
temporary release for medical treatment which was anticipated to occur within days.
Ricci then proceeded to schedule his so-called “emergency” surgery for four months
later. Yet he immediately violated the conditions of his release by again interfering with
witnesses and failing to report police contact to Probation. Only when the government
filed a Motion to Reconsider Temporary Release (ECF No. 28), did Ricci move the
surgery up to two months later.
On the eve of sentencing, Ricci again scheduled surgery four weeks after the
sentencing date, just beyond the ordinary time for self-reporting. The Court indulged
Ricci by extending his self-report for several weeks in order to accommodate the
surgery and “recovery.” Now, two days before he is supposed to self-report to Federal
Medical Center Devens, Ricci submits an “emergency” motion to extend his self-report
date to allow surgery three months from now in late September or October.
The timing of Ricci’s filing gives away the game. The surgery was scheduled for
June 26, 2024. Only last week, on July 2, Ricci requested and received permission from
the U.S. Probation Office to move back into his residence in North Kingston, RI with his
dogs. Ricci made no mention to Probation of the fact that his surgery had been
cancelled. Who moves residences eight days before beginning a three year federal
prison sentence? One who believes they will not begin serving the sentence in eight
days.
Later that same day, July 2, Ricci met with an FBI agent in Chelsea, MA to
retrieve property being returned to him. Ricci told the agent that he moved back into
his North Kingston residence because “it was better for his dogs.” Ricci further told the
agent that his surgery was postponed because his insurance said it was out of network.
2
Ricci told the agent that he wanted to get the surgery before he reported to prison
because a friend of his brother had been to prison and said the health care was not
good. Ricci stated the friend said if you have a toothache, they give you pain medicine
and if it still hurts they just pull the tooth. Ricci stated he had a new lawyer and they
were going to file a motion to change the date he needed to report to prison. Ricci
further stated he was supposed to report to FMC Devens. 1
Ricci’s motion is nothing but a cynical attempt to manipulate the Court. Ricci
has known since at least June 26, the scheduled date of the surgery, and possibly earlier,
that it was cancelled. Nonetheless, Ricci sat on this information and did not file his
“emergency” motion until less than 48 hours before he is supposed to report. The letter
submitted in support of the requests is dated July 2, and yet was not provided to the
government except through the ECF filing July 9. It contains vastly more information
than one would typically observe in medical documentation and has all the hallmarks
of having been manipulated or coerced by the defendant. Ricci has a history of
submitting false information to this Court in support of his requests for release related
to his medical condition and other courts throughout the history of this case. Yet the
timing of the filing means that even further investigating the legitimacy of this
documentation would require giving Ricci the delay he is bent on receiving.
In any event, it is apparent from the nature of the documentation that Ricci’s
medical condition presents no emergency. If it was an emergency, it could not wait
1
Ricci’s statements were documented in an FBI 302 which has been provided to defense
counsel and can be made available to the Court upon request.
3
until October for treatment. Ricci has been designated to FMC Devens, which is a
medical facility more than capable of handling his health care needs. If medical
professionals in the BOP determine Ricci truly needs surgery, they are capable of
making arrangements to do so, either at FMC Devens or through health care partners
outside the BOP facility.
CONCLUSION
For the reasons set forth herein, the Court should deny the defendant’s Motion to
Postpone his self-surrender date.
Respectfully submitted,
ZACHARY A. CUNHA
United States Attorney
s/ John P. McAdams
John P. McAdams
Assistant U.S. Attorney
john.p.mcadams@usdoj.gov
4
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on this 9th day of July, 2024, I caused the within
Government’s Motion to Revoke to be filed electronically and it is available for viewing
and downloading from the ECF system.
/s/ John P. McAdams
John P. McAdams
Assistant U.S. Attorney
United States Attorney’s Office
One Financial Plaza, 17th Floor
Providence, RI 02903
401-709-5000 (tel) / 401-709-5001 (fax)
john.p.mcadams@usdoj.gov
5
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.rid.55285.86.0.pdf
- Size
- 83,192 bytes
- SHA-256
- e3c9d5469b344a2aff552b3a09c2af17ee4a98b68f96f76843edf0770dbf60f6
- Our copy
- gov.uscourts.rid.55285.86.0.pdf
- Original
- archive.org