Worksheet for Report of Parties' Planning Meeting — United States v. Ryan Bailey and RKB, Inc., 5:24-cv-00456

Summary

Worksheet for Report of Parties' Planning Meeting (LR Civ P 16.1 Form), Document 32-1, filed 06/26/26 in Case No. 5:24-cv-00456, United States of America v. Ryan Bailey and RKB, Inc. It requests a jury trial and lists a scheduling conference date of 7/13/26, a last date to serve discovery requests of 9/15/26, and a last date to take a discovery deposition of 10/30/26. Other entries give 8/30/26 for expert disclosures by the party bearing the burden of proof, 10/16/26 for rebuttal expert disclosures, 2/14/27 as the requested pretrial conference, and 2/28/27 as the requested trial date. The form states that the parties do consent to a magistrate judge conducting all proceedings.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.

Case 5:24-cv-00456 Document 32-1 Filed 06/26/26 Page 1 of 1 PagelD #: 163
LR Civ P 16.1 Form (05/2023)

WORKSHEET FOR REPORT OF PARTIES' PLANNING MEETING

The guidelines found in the comments on this form are those recommended by the Court. Generally, the Court expects the parties to adhere
to the Guidelines. However, the Court retains authority to make final determination as to all scheduled matters.

Case Style: United States of America v. Ryan Bailey and RKB, Inc.

Case No. 5:24-cv-00456 Type of trial requested: Jury trial
Date case filed/removed = A: 8/28/24 Date Ist defendant appears = X: 2/19/26
Date of scheduling conference: 7/13/26 Date of Joinder and amendments:

Last date to serve discovery requests = Y: 9/15/26

Last date to take a discovery deposition = Z; 10/30/26

Number of discovery requests and depositions: by Federal Rules.

Rule 26(a)(2) disclosures re experts:
By party bearing burden of proof: 8/30/26
By party not bearing burden of proof: 9/39/26
Rebuttal expert disclosures: 10/16/26

The parties do consent to a magistrate judge conducting all proceedings.

Mediation (select one):
[Y] Date by which mediation will take place: | 1/30/26
[_] At least one party believes that mediation is inappropriate in this action.

Dispositive motions - not Rule 12 (select one):
[_] It is unlikely that dispositive motions will be filed in this action.
Date of settlement meeting and Rule 26(a)(3) disclosures: 1/10/27

Plaintiff(s) portion of Pretrial Order due to defendant(s): 1/31/27

Integrated Pretrial Order due: 2/7/27

Pretrial conference requested for: 2/14/27

Proposed charge to the jury due: 2/21/27
-OR-
Proposed findings of fact/conclusions of law due: 2/14/27

Final settlement conference date requested: 2/27/26

Trial date requested: 2/28/27


File and source

File

gov.uscourts.wvsd.239921.32.1.pdf

Size

146,679 bytes

SHA-256

9257beb7983a5bd9d0b35d9258221631c387dd793f148af02be319d91808e027

Our copy

gov.uscourts.wvsd.239921.32.1.pdf

Original

No public link identified.