Plaintiffs' Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction — Democratic National Committee
Summary
In the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin, Civil Action No. 3:20-cv-00249, Plaintiffs Democratic National Committee and Democratic Party of Wisconsin move for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction against Defendants, the Wisconsin Elections Commissioners named in their official capacities, dated March 18, 2020. Plaintiffs seek to restrain enforcement of the on-line and mail-in registration deadline, proof of residence and photo identification copy requirements, and the requirement that absentee ballots be received by 8:00 p.m. on Election Day. Plaintiffs assert that the challenged provisions severely burden voters during the COVID-19 crisis ahead of the April 7, 2020 election, and ask that the registration deadline be extended to April 3. The motion is signed /s/ Bruce V. Spiva.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Plaintiffs' Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction — Democratic National Committee.”
Original at archive.org. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/gov-uscourts-wiwd-45522-2-0-aa0dd1d250/
, SHA-256 d3232caa317e482b4143181c3314bdbc97607433c78a94f213dc782360dea1d9.Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE and
DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF WISCONSIN Civil Action No. 3:20-cv-00249
Plaintiffs,
v.
MARGE BOSTELMANN, JULIE M. GLANCEY,
ANN S. JACOBS, DEAN KNUDSON, ROBERT
F. SPINDELL, JR., and MARK L. THOMSEN, in
their official capacities as Wisconsin Elections
Commissioners,
Defendants.
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
Plaintiffs DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE (“DNC”) and DEMOCRATIC
PARTY OF WISCONSIN, by and through their attorneys, respectfully move the Court pursuant
to Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for a temporary restraining order and, after
further proceedings, a preliminary injunction restraining Defendants and their respective agents,
officers, employees, and successors, and all persons acting in concert with each or any of them,
from enforcing (1) the current on-line and mail-in registration deadline, Wisc. Stat. § 6.28(1); (2)
requirements that copies of proof of residence and voter ID accompany electronic and by-mail
voter registration, id. § 6.34; (3) requirements that copies of photo identification accompany
absentee ballot applications, id. §§ 6.86, 6.87; and (4) the requirement that polling places receive
absentee ballots by 8:00 p.m. on Election Day to be counted (“Election Day Receipt Deadline”),
id. § 6.87 (collectively, the “Challenged Provisions”).
Plaintiffs are entitled to a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction because
they are substantially likely to succeed on the merits of their claim that the Challenged Provisions
severely burden the rights of Wisconsin voters and deprive them of a liberty interest. The United
States is in the throes of an unprecedented crisis and, as COVID-19 spreads throughout the country,
Americans⸺including Wisconsinites⸺are forced to socially distance themselves to try to slow
the spread of the disease in a communal effort to save their friends, neighbors, and families, with
no clear end in sight. 1 Wisconsin voters⸺including thousands of Plaintiffs’ members and
constituents⸺should not also be forced to make the untenable choice between their safety and
potentially endangering the lives of others and exercising their fundamental right to vote. Yet, the
Challenged Provisions do just that, forcing voters to resort to in-person registration or to leaving
their homes to copy documents. Moreover, they impose arbitrary deadlines that simply cannot be
met in the current crisis. If the Challenged Provisions are not enjoined during this unprecedented
crisis, they will individually and collectively pose significant risks to voters seeking to exercise
their right to vote in the upcoming April 7, 2020 election and in any election held while the crisis
persists. Plaintiffs are also entitled to relief because they will suffer irreparable harm absent relief,
and traditional legal remedies will not adequately protect their rights. Further, the harm to Plaintiffs
and Wisconsin voters outweighs any putative harm to the State, and the relief Plaintiffs seek is in
the public interest. In order to maintain the status quo pending determination of their motion for
preliminary injunction, Plaintiffs seek an immediate temporary restraining order to prevent these
immediate and irreparable injuries to Wisconsin voters’ rights.
For the foregoing reasons, and as set forth in the accompanying Brief in Support of
Plaintiffs’ Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction, the DNC and
1
Just yesterday, in fact, Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers banned public gatherings of more than 10 people effective
at 5:00 p.m. on March 17, 2020. Sarah Seifert, Evers bans gatherings of 10 people or more, LEADER-TELEGRAM (Mar.
17, 2020), https://www.leadertelegram.com/covid-19/evers-bans-gatherings-of-people-or-more/article_b9d9d9b3-
d3a3-5725-a278-5562b2c18ace.html. The latest estimates indicate that the current crisis and social distancing efforts
could persist for the next 14 to 18 months.
-2-
Democratic Party of Wisconsin respectfully request that this Court grant an immediate Temporary
Restraining Order and, after further proceedings, a Preliminary Injunction enjoining (1)
enforcement of the March 18 electronic and by-mail voter registration deadline and extending it
to April 3; (2) the requirement that new voter registrations include copies of proof of residency,
(3) the requirement that absentee voters include a copy of voter identification with absentee ballot
requests, and (4) the rejection of ballots that are postmarked on or before Election Day and arrive
at a polling place or municipal clerk’s office within, at a minimum, ten days of Election Day and
ballots that do not have a postmark or other marking from the United States Postal Service are
presumed to have been mailed on or before Election Day.
Dated this 18th day of March, 2020.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Bruce V. Spiva
Marc E. Elias
John Devaney
Bruce V. Spiva
Amanda R. Callais
Zachary J. Newkirk*
PERKINS COIE LLP
700 Thirteenth St., N.W., Suite 600
Washington, D.C. 20005-3960
Telephone: (202) 654-6200
Facsimile: (202) 654-9959
melias@perkinscoie.com
acallais@perkinscoie.com
scommand@perkinscoie.com
Charles G. Curtis, Jr.
Sopen B. Shah
PERKINS COIE LLP
33 East Main Street, Suite 201
Madison, Wisconsin 53703-3095
Telephone: (608) 663-7460
-3-
Facsimile: (608) 663-7499
CCurtis@perkinscoie.com
SShah@perkinscoie.com
Counsel for the Plaintiffs
*Motion for Pro Hac Vice Forthcoming
-4-File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.wiwd.45522.2.0.pdf
- Size
- 57,324 bytes
- SHA-256
- d3232caa317e482b4143181c3314bdbc97607433c78a94f213dc782360dea1d9
- Our copy
- gov.uscourts.wiwd.45522.2.0.pdf
- Original
- archive.org