Motion to Adopt Co-Defendant's Motion for Additional Peremptory Strikes — United States v. Macaulay
Summary
Defendant Macaulay's Motion to Adopt, Join, and Conform Co-Defendant Rahbar's Motion for Additional Peremptory Strikes, Case No. 24-cr-180-PTG-2, Document 97, filed March 31, 2025, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. Ryan Macaulay, through undersigned counsel, asks the Court to allow him to adopt Defendant Rahbar's Motion for Additional Peremptory Strikes (Dkt. No. 95). The motion states that facts and legal arguments in motions filed by his co-defendant are equally relevant to his case and that separate motions would largely mirror those already filed. A certificate of service is dated the 31st day of March, 2025.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Motion to Adopt Co-Defendant's Motion for Additional Peremptory Strikes — United States v. Macaulay.”
Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/gov-uscourts-vaed-558615-97-0-0e6c50a102/
, SHA-256 3132a9546c43fc0fcad7dae0919b772850a36b5d6af0d900b230050ca1994aba.Full text
Case 1:24-cr-00180-PTG Document 97 Filed 03/31/25 Page 1 of 2 PageID# 563
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
)
UNITED STATES )
)
v. )
) Case No. 24-cr-180-PTG-2
RYAN MACAULAY )
Defendant )
____________________________________)
DEFENDANT MACAULAY’S MOTION TO ADOPT, JOIN, AND CONFORM CO-
DEFENDANT RAHBAR’S MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL PEREMPTORY STRIKES
Ryan Macaulay, by and through undersigned counsel, respectfully moves to adopt, join,
and conform to specific motions, petitions, and other applications for relief that have been filed
by or on behalf of his co-defendant in this case, insofar as they may relate to him.
As such, facts that are contained in the motions filed by Mr. Macaulay’s co-defendant are
equally relevant and applicable to his case in this prosecution. The legal arguments and
authorities outlined in those motions are essentially the same that Mr. Macaulay would have
raised had he filed separate motions. Requiring Mr. Macaulay to prepare and file individual
motions addressing the same issues would result in redundant and inefficient use of time and
resources, as the motions would largely mirror those already filed by his co-defendant.
Motions to adopt, join, and conform are a practical and efficient way to address legal
issues common to multiple defendants in a multi-defendant case. Permitting a defendant to
adopt, join, or conform to motions filed by a co-defendant eliminates unnecessary duplication of
effort when the legal and factual issues overlap. Courts routinely grant motions to adopt, join, or
conform where such overlap exists, recognizing the efficiency of addressing shared issues in a
unified manner. See, e.g., United States v. Cawthorn, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96352, *2-3 (D.
Md. 2023); United States v. Fawley, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68649, *4-5 (N.D. W.Va. 2012);
1
Case 1:24-cr-00180-PTG Document 97 Filed 03/31/25 Page 2 of 2 PageID# 564
United States v. Kloptoski, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1291, *12 (M.D. Pa. 2010). Such motions
conserve judicial and party resources by avoiding the filing of duplicative motions and ensuring
consistent legal arguments across related defendants.
Mr. Macaulay respectfully requests this Court allow him to adopt the following co-
defendant motion previously filed in this matter:
1. Defendant Rahbar’s Motion for Additional Peremptory Strikes. See Dkt. No. 95.
For the foregoing reasons, Ryan Macaulay respectfully requests that the Court grant this
motion to adopt, join, and conform the motions delineated herein.
Respectfully submitted,
__________/s/___________________
David Benowitz
VSB # 91194
Rammy G. Barbari
VSB # 88414
Price Benowitz LLP
409 7th Street, NW, Suite 200
Washington, D.C. 20004
Tel: 202-271-5249
Tel: 202-870-0139
Fax: 202-664-1331
david@pricebenowitz.com
rammy@pricebenowitz.com
Counsel for Ryan Macaulay
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on this 31st day of March, 2025, a true and correct copy of the
foregoing Defendant’s Motion has been served via CM/ECF to all parties in this matter.
__________/s/___________________
David Benowitz
2
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.vaed.558615.97.0.pdf
- Size
- 115,182 bytes
- SHA-256
- 3132a9546c43fc0fcad7dae0919b772850a36b5d6af0d900b230050ca1994aba
- Original
- No public link identified.