Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Objection to Proposed Class Settlement — U.S. Navy SEALs 1-26 v. Biden (Dkt. 303)

Objection to Proposed Class Settlement — U.S. Navy SEALs 1-26 v. Biden (Dkt. 303)

Summary

Jozef V. Dekan III writes to the Clerk's Office of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth Division, in an Objection to Proposed Class Settlement in U.S. Navy SEALs 1-26 v. Biden, Case No. 4:21-cv-01236-O, Document 303, filed 07/17/24. The letter says a package from First Liberty Institute about the settlement was received and that the writer declines the Proposed Class Settlement. It gives a dated account beginning in OCT2021, covering a refused religious exemption, an appeal, separation packages, orders to Bremerton, Washington and a separation date of 20MAY2024. The letter closes by asking that the lawsuit proceed.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Objection to Proposed Class Settlement — U.S. Navy SEALs 1-26 v. Biden (Dkt. 303).” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/gov-uscourts-txnd-355696-303-0-133eb8fa86/, SHA-256 96b1b647e78e4760bfc41d478b5e14c4fc6938ea588541ae834d6760348c43fc.

Full text

Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors. Page 7 of 7 is not shown because the text could not be recognized reliably.

Case 4:21-cv-01236-O0 Document 303 Filed 07/17/24 Page t 1of 7 _ PagelD § 8382 _

15JUL2024

Clerk’s Office

United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

Fort Worth Division

501 West 10% Street, Room 310

Fort Worth, Texas 76102-3673

ATIN: U.S. Navy SEALs 1-26 v. Biden, Case No. 4:21-cv-01236-O (N.D. Tex), Objections to
Proposed Class Settlement

To Whom It Concerns:

I recently received a package in the mail from First Liberty Institute regarding a settlement for
U.S. Navy SEALs 1-26 v. Biden, Case No. 4:21-cv-01236-O (N.D. Tex.). Regarding this matter,
I wish to respectfully decline the Proposed Class Settlement offered on behalf of the United
Sates Government. Below is an account of my individual experience during my time on active
duty while vaccination was mandated, outlining my reasoning for declination of the Proposed
Class Settlement:

-In OCT2021 the COVID vaccine was made mandatory for service members. I refused it.

-I had a BUD/S package I had been working on for the last 8 years, I wanted to salvage it, so I
requested a religious exemption, they refused it.

-I filed an appeal, they denied it.

-I completed a separation package and, shortly thereafter, my daughter started self-mutilating so
I took leave to attend to my family.
Case 4:21-cv-01236-O Document 303 Filed 07/17/24 Page 2of7 PagelD 8383

-By the time I returned the SEALs had filed their injunction against the Navy so all COVID
related separations were halted. I also would be informed by my COC that I had new orders to

remain on LIMDU in Bremerton, Washington until all of this was sorted out by the powers that
be.

-The DIVO of personnel told me those orders were invalid and not to worry about them that
everyone with an exemption received them. However, they were never canceled or executed so I
remained attached to CVN-71.

-Eventually the Navy offered sailors with pending exemptions to rescind and be ADMIN
separated which I declined for quite some time.

-In JUL2022 during this standby period my wife threatened to divorce me if I didn't give this up
so I rescinded the exemption request and took some leave to go home and work things out with
her and attend my daughter’s birthday.

-While I awaited my separation letter I watched as other people who had situations identical to
mine were expeditiously separated from the Navy one by one, until eventually I was the only one
left in my weekly testing group of unvaccinated sailors that hadn't been separated.

-I inquired to everyone from my COC, to legal, to command career, to personnel, and my detailer
for months on end ad nauseum asking why I wasn't being separated and whether or not the orders
or something else was causing the delay and I was told time and time again not to worry about it
that everyone was tracking and that these things just take time.

-I was eventually told that my initial separation package was never submitted (the folder "got
lost") so I submitted a second package but by the time that got processed the mandate had been
pulled, further complicating matters, so I was left with no other option but continue to wait fora
definitive answer regarding my situation.

-While in Bremerton I was privileged to attend a meet and greet with the new MCPON and got
the unique opportunity to ask him face to face about this situation. My wife even went so far as
Case 4:21-cv-01236-O Document 303 Filed 07/17/24 Page3of7 PagelD 8384

to contact two separate congressmen for some kind of answer as to what would be the outcome
and we still got no legitimate response. Just the same old same old about the mandates being
pulled and that separation on those grounds was no longer a thing, and it was complicated.

-Things continued on in this fashion for months with everyone I spoke to telling me either not to
worry about it or that they would get back to me. However, nothing ever came of it.

-On 09MAR2023 right before we were scheduled to leave Bremerton my Chief and LPO
informed me that I had to go to legal immediately to sign paperwork because I was on an admin
tickler to be separated that day. But when I got there, legal refused saying they weren't doing
that anymore. I told them that if I had a separation letter? I wanted to go home. I went back
work after this meeting, and continued to wait.

-I returned to San Diego with the ship and continued to ask all the right questions to all the right
people and eventually the story changed and the orders were now the problem according to
everyone that had once denied they were.

-By now so much time had passed that if I wanted to execute them, I would have to fill out a
1306, cancel them, have them reissued, and tack several months onto my EAOS in order to
satisfy an accounting modification to fund the transfer.

-I refused and contacted my detailer who told me yes, they should've been executed without
exception because those were my orders. And that me formally requesting with a 1306 was the
only way to follow through, even if I wanted to stay at the command which was even more out of
the question. I never signed the 1306 canceling the orders.

-Shortly after this I was taken out of Crash and Salvage where I had worked for 4 years and sent
to Fly 2. No concrete reason was ever provided as to why this was done.

-In MAY2023 I scheduled a meeting with my CMC to try and reach a resolution. My DLCPO
for air department as well as the DLCPO of personnel were also in attendance at this meeting
and all of the above was reiterated once again and once again I was met with more of the same.
Case 4:21-cv-01236-O0 Document 303 Filed 07/17/24 Page4of7 PagelD 8385

-The CMC took a folder from me that he said he didn't need copies of and said he would get
back to me and once his staff had made a determination and again, I was left waiting with no

reply.

-I contacted my detailer again and he told me that I should sign just 1306 canceling the orders
and I disagreed stating that this wasn't a problem that I created and that after all this I had
precious little desire to stay under the chain of command at CVN-71 nor in the Navy for that
matter.

-In JUN2023 a folder appeared on my rack from my divisional career counselor that turned out
to be the wet copies of my initial separation package that "got lost".

-At this time, I was told that if I refused to sign the 1306 canceling the orders to Bremerton the
command would be unable to separate me at my standing EAOS because I didn't have proper
orders to the command and I still refused stating that this was ridiculous, why I was inquiring so
hard about all this in the first place to avoid a situation like the one I'm in now, and that I
wouldn't just alleviate them of their accountability like that.

-I once again went down to personnel to inquire about how we were going to resolve this
situation to find out that the Bremerton orders had been canceled (without a 1306).

-I requested to be put on beach detail was denied and taken along on deployment.

-I had at this point for the third time prepared my capstone package, and all other necessary
components for separation at my EAOS of 20MAY2024.

-While working on my separation evaluation with my LPO we needed to verify some
dates. Dates that were easily accessed by looking to the terminal leave folder.
Case 4:21-cv-01236-O Document 303 Filed 07/17/24 Page5of7 PagelD 8386

-However, when we opened the folder all of the paperwork was gone and only the checkoff list
remained (with all the boxes checked off).

-I decided at this point to hand-walk the remaining portions of the paperwork necessary to
generate my DD214 and official date of separation and these efforts were met with more side
eyes and animosity.

-Furthermore, other people within my division had their paperwork expedited even obtaining
waivers for aspects that were mandatory (i.e., TAPS courses) to my understanding as they were
explained to me.

-I submitted a statement with my separation evaluation and that was also met with no small
amount of frustration.

-I was scheduled to be flown off the ship 066APR2023, my DLCPO canceled that citing "there
was not enough room on the COD".

-I was flown off the very next day, 07 APR2023, and arrived at Naval Base San Diego TPU on
09APR2023 via Okinawa.

-I flew home 01MAY2024 for terminal leave and still have not received a copy of my official
DD14. Currently the VA is helping me obtain that paperwork.

I tried to be as concise as possible however my story is a very complicated one with a lot of
caveats unique to my own personal experiences. I have collected literally every scrap of paper
and every email for the last three years. All of the information above can be verified and further
explained if necessary.

In closing, I would like once again to respectfully decline the Proposed Class Settlement offered
on behalf of the United Sates Government regarding U.S. Navy SEALs 1-26 v. Biden, Case No.
Case 4:21-cv-01236-O0 Document 303 Filed 07/17/24 Page6of7 PagelD 8387

4:21-cv-01236-O (N.D. Tex.). This period in history has done immeasurable amounts of damage
to innumerable amounts of people. My story is just one of many, and from where I sit the only
way to ensure that something like this never happens again is to continue to fight the good the
fight, proceed with the lawsuit, and refuse to let accountability be anything less than a
universally applicable precept.

V.

ABH3(AW/SW) Jozef V. Dekan III


File and source

File
gov.uscourts.txnd.355696.303.0.pdf
Size
834,314 bytes
SHA-256
96b1b647e78e4760bfc41d478b5e14c4fc6938ea588541ae834d6760348c43fc
Our copy
gov.uscourts.txnd.355696.303.0.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top