Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Order Granting Expedited Consideration — Terkel v. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Order Granting Expedited Consideration — Terkel v. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Summary

A form of order, Document 14-1, filed 11/17/20 in Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-564-JCB in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division, in a case brought by Lauren Terkel and several apartment and property companies against the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and others. It is titled an order granting plaintiffs' emergency unopposed motion for expedited consideration of plaintiffs' motion for preliminary injunction. The form states that the Court finds the motion has merit and is granted, offers alternatives of setting oral argument or declining at this time to conduct oral argument while reserving the right to reconsider, and states that the Court grants expedited consideration.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Order Granting Expedited Consideration — Terkel v. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/gov-uscourts-txed-201598-14-1-8e13fee37c/, SHA-256 07e9b250bc4a5393f6cb1c51c8f5bf6c525186d94ee83bd9818ecdf0bd1e983c.

Full text

Case 6:20-cv-00564-JCB Document 14-1 Filed 11/17/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 220




                       IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                        FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
                                  TYLER DIVISION

LAUREN        TERKEL;   PINEYWOODS                   §
ARCADIA HOME TEAM, LTD; LUFKIN                       §
CREEKSIDE APARTMENTS, LTD; LUFKIN                    §
CREEKSIDE APARTMENTS II, LTD;                        §
LAKERIDGE        APARTMENTS,   LTD;                  §
WEATHERFORD         MEADOW    VISTA                  §
APARTMENTS, LP; and MACDONALD                        §   CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-564-JCB
PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, LLC;                            §   JUDGE BARKER
     Plaintiffs,                                     §
                                                     §
        v.                                           §
                                                     §
CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND                      §
PREVENTION; ROBERT R. REDFIELD, in his               §
official capacity as Director of the Centers for     §
Disease Control and Prevention; NINA                 §
WITKOFSKY, in her official capacity as Acting        §
Chief of Staff for the Centers for Disease Control   §
and      Prevention;      UNITED         STATES      §
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN                       §
SERVICES; and ALEX AZAR, in his official             §
capacity as Secretary of the Department of           §
Health and Human Services;                           §
         Defendants.                                 §

             ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ EMERGENCY UNOPPOPSED
             MOTION FOR EXPEDITED CONSIDERATION OF PLAINTIFFS’
                    MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

       BE IT REMEMBERED that on this day, the Court considered Plaintiffs’ Emergency

Unopposed Motion for Expedited Consideration of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction.

The Court finds that Plaintiffs’ Motion has merit and is GRANTED.

   Therefore, the Court Orders as follows:

   1. ___ the Court sets oral argument on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction for

       November ____, 2020, at __:___ am/pm via instructions that the Clerk’s office shall notify

       counsel
Case 6:20-cv-00564-JCB Document 14-1 Filed 11/17/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 221




     OR

     ___ the Court declines at this time to conduct oral argument on Plaintiffs’ Motion but

     reserves the right to reconsider.

  2. The Court grants expedited consideration of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction.




                                              2

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.txed.201598.14.1.pdf
Size
44,678 bytes
SHA-256
07e9b250bc4a5393f6cb1c51c8f5bf6c525186d94ee83bd9818ecdf0bd1e983c
Our copy
gov.uscourts.txed.201598.14.1.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top