Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Antonio Vitolo v. Case No 3 Complaint

Antonio Vitolo v. Case No 3 Complaint

Summary

A two-page corporate disclosure filing in Jake's Bar and Grill, LLC, and Antonio Vitolo v. Isabella Casillas Guzman, Case No. 3:21cv176, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee, filed May 12, 2021 as Document 13 in Case 3:21-cv-00176-TRM-DCP; its caption is headed Complaint. As required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, plaintiff Jake's Bar and Grill, LLC declares that it has no parent corporation and that no publicly held corporation owns 10% or more of its stock. It is signed for the plaintiffs by Daniel P. Lennington of the Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty, with Rick Esenberg and Luke N. Berg listed with pro hac vice pending, and by Matthew J. McClanahan of McClanahan & Winston, PC.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

                  IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
 ______________________________________________________________________________

 JAKE’S BAR AND GRILL, LLC, and
 ANTONIO VITOLO,

                   Plaintiffs,
    v.                                                 Case No. 3:21cv176

 ISABELLA CASILLAS GUZMAN,

                Defendant.
 ______________________________________________________________________________

                                 COMPLAINT
 ______________________________________________________________________________

         As required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, Plaintiff Jake’s Bar and Grill, LLC,

 declares that it has no parent corporation or any publicly held corporation that

 owns 10% or more of its stock.


 Dated: May 12, 2021                      WISCONSIN INSTITUTE FOR LAW & LIBERTY
                                          Rick Esenberg (pro hac vice pending)
                                          rick@will-law.org
                                          /s/ Daniel P. Lennington
                                          Daniel P. Lennington (pro hac vice pending)
                                          dan@will-law.org
                                          Luke N. Berg (pro hac vice pending)
                                          luke@will-law.org
                                          330 E. Kilbourn Ave., Suite 725
                                          Milwaukee, WI 53202
                                          Phone: (414) 727-9455
                                          Fax: (414)727-6385




                                             1

Case 3:21-cv-00176-TRM-DCP Document 13 Filed 05/12/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 98

                                    /s/ Matthew J. McClanahan
                                    Matthew J. McClanahan (BPR #036867)
                                    McClanahan & Winston, PC
                                    PO Box 51907
                                    Knoxville, Tennessee 37950
                                    Telephone: (865) 347-3921
                                    Fax: (865) 444-0786
                                    Email: matt@tennadvocate.com

                                    Attorneys for Plaintiffs




                                       2

Case 3:21-cv-00176-TRM-DCP Document 13 Filed 05/12/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 99

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.tned.99748.13.0.pdf
Size
90,532 bytes
SHA-256
9e41d13f62682318325225e1ccd3be4eec12e5a1cb1d4f70e1938cde22d4806a
Our copy
gov.uscourts.tned.99748.13.0.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
  1. Stipulation Purusant To Local Rule 12.1: GRILL, LLC, v. ISABELLA CASILLAS GUZMAN,same docket
  2. Government Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction — Vitolo v. Guzman (E.D. Tenn.)same docket · 2021-08-06
  3. Memorandum Opinion Denying Additional Plaintiffs' TRO — Vitolo v. Guzman (E.D. Tenn.)same docket · 2021-06-10
  4. Plaintiffs' Reply in Support of Second Emergency Motion for TRO — Vitolo v. Guzmansame docket · 2021-06-07
  5. Order Directing Mootness Briefing — Vitolo v. Guzmansame docket · 2021-06-04
  6. Declaration of John A. Miller — Vitolo v. Guzman (E.D. Tenn.)same docket · 2021-06-03
  7. Government's Response to Second Emergency Motion for TRO — Vitolo v. Guzman (E.D. Tenn.)same docket · 2021-06-03
  8. Sixth Circuit Opinion — Vitolo v. Guzmansame docket · 2021-05-27
  9. Memorandum Opinion Denying PI — Vitolo v. Guzman (E.D. Tenn.)same docket · 2021-05-25
  10. Defendant’s Opposition to PI — Vitolo v. Guzman (E.D. Tenn.)same docket · 2021-05-21
  11. Memorandum Opinion Denying TRO — Vitolo v. Guzman (E.D. Tenn.)same docket · 2021-05-19
  12. Emergency Motion for Injunction Pending Appeal — Vitolo v. Guzmansame docket · 2021-05-19
  13. Declaration of Dianna L. Seaborn — Vitolo v. Guzmansame docket · 2021-05-16
  14. Government's Opposition to Motion for TRO — Vitolo v. Guzmansame docket · 2021-05-16
  15. Supplemental Brief in Support of TRO and PI — Vitolo v. Guzmansame docket · 2021-05-12
  16. Motion for Temporary Restraining Order — Vitolo v. Guzmansame docket · 2021-05-12
  17. Motion for Preliminary Injunction — Vitolo v. Guzmansame docket · 2021-05-12
  18. Memorandum in Support of TRO and PI — Vitolo v. Guzmansame docket · 2021-05-12
  19. Declaration of Antonio Vitolo — Vitolo v. Guzman (E.D. Tenn.)same docket · 2021-05-12
  20. Complaint — Vitolo v. Guzmansame docket · 2021-05-12

Part of: Vitolo v. Guzman — U.S. District Court, E.D. Tenn., Knoxville Division · Other pandemic litigation · Complaints and indictments · Federal court dockets (PACER) · Source documents

Back to top