Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Pretrial Order — United States v. Leslie Danielle Bethea (Dkt. 17)

Pretrial Order — United States v. Leslie Danielle Bethea (Dkt. 17)

Summary

A Pretrial Order, Document 17, filed April 18, 2018 in United States of America v. Leslie Bethea, Case 2:18-cr-00025-JRG-CRW, in the United States District Court Eastern District of Tennessee at Greeneville. It states that the pretrial conference and motion hearing scheduled for April 23, 2018 at 9:00 a.m. are canceled because no motions were filed. It assigns the action for a jury trial before the Honorable Pamela L. Reeves to begin at 9:00 a.m. on May 22, 2018. Its trial procedures cover voir dire, ten (10) peremptory challenges for the Defendant and six (6) for the Government, a bar on motions without leave of the Court, review of trial exhibits, a charge conference and presentence report objections within 14 days. It closes with s/Clifton L. Corker, United States Magistrate Judge.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Pretrial Order — United States v. Leslie Danielle Bethea (Dkt. 17).” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/gov-uscourts-tned-84581-17-0-bf4730b86c/, SHA-256 00b06e2255dd386637de79fbe29a64fd89e260239046bf6625a45788e353ea24.

Full text

                              UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                              EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
                                    AT GREENEVILLE


 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA                              )
                                                       )
 v.                                                    )       No. 2:18-CR-25
                                                       )
 LESLIE BETHEA                                         )


                                         PRETRIAL ORDER

         In this action, a pretrial conference pursuant to Rule 12.1, Federal Rules of Criminal

 Procedure, and a motion hearing were scheduled for April 23, 2018 at 9:00 a.m. No motions having

 been filed, the pretrial conference and motion hearings are CANCELED. This action is

 hereby assigned for trial with a jury before the Honorable Pamela L. Reeves to commence at

 9:00 a.m. on May 22, 2018. This order is entered as a guide to counsel with regard to the trial and/or

 sentencing procedures.

         1. Trial procedures to be followed in this case are as follows:

                 (a) The Clerk may provide counsel with a jury list containing names and

 personal information concerning prospective petit jurors (hereafter "the jury list"). Counsel and

 any other person provided with the jury list may not share the jury list or information therein

 except as necessary for purposes of jury selection. Following jury selection, counsel and any other

 person provided the jury list must return to the clerk the jury list and any copies made from the

 jury list or destroy them.

       The Court will conduct a preliminary voir dire examination of the jury, and then




Case 2:18-cr-00025-JRG-CRW             Document 17         Filed 04/18/18     Page 1 of 3      PageID
                                             #: 54
 counsel will be permitted to conduct voir dire. The Court reserves the right to interrupt counsel and

 conduct voir dire on its own if counsel asks improper questions, or if the proceedings are

 unnecessarily prolonged.

                 (b) Under Rule 24(b), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Defendant is

 entitled to ten (10) peremptory challenges and the Government is entitled to six (6).

                 (c) Legal issues that counsel has foreseen are: none.

                 (d) Evidentiary problems that counsel has foreseen are: none.

                 (e) If counsel has any special requests for instructions to the jury, the same should

 be filed as directed by the Court in its prior order.

                 (f) Defendant's counsel will be permitted to make an opening statement to the

 jury prior to the commencement of the Government's proof.

                 (g) No motions may be filed in this cause of action by either side without the prior

 leave of the Court to do so, the motion cutoff date having passed.

                 (h) Counsel should meet in advance of trial and carefully review trial exhibits with

 a view toward stipulating the admissibility of as many exhibits as possible.

                 (i) The Court will conduct a charge conference. On the morning of trial, the Court

 will furnish counsel with a draft of the proposed charge. Then, a charge conference will be

 conducted by the Court at the conclusion of all of the proof and before the arguments. Any

 objections, requests, etc., relative to the charge should be presented at this time. Any request for

 an additional charge or a different charge should be in writing, if possible. Of




                                                    2


Case 2:18-cr-00025-JRG-CRW              Document 17       Filed 04/18/18        Page 2 of 3   PageID
                                              #: 55
 course, these rules do not in any way modify the requirement that special requests to instruct be filed

 prior to trial as previously instructed by the Court.

                 (j) If there is a conviction in this matter, a pre-sentence report will be prepared. All

 parties shall proceed in accordance with Local Rule 83.9. Objections to a presentence report

 shall NOT be filed with the Clerk, but must be made within 14 days after the Report is filed with

 the Court. If an evidentiary hearing will be necessary to resolve any objection or any response

 thereto, this must be indicated in the objection or the response. A statement of no objections to

 the presentence report must be before the Court within 14 days after the Report is filed with the

 Court.

                 (k) The digital evidence presentation system both facilitates and expedites

 hearings and trials; the attorneys shall familiarize themselves with this courtroom technology

 and make full use of it. It is the responsibility of the parties and their attorneys to ensure that any

 electronic, digital, audio, or video material is compatible with the Court’s equipment and that such

 compatibility has been confirmed well in advance of hearing or trial. Any failure to do so will not

 be considered sufficient reason for delay or postponement of the hearing or trial. Further, it shall be

 the responsibility of any party wishing to present such evidence to bring with him or her all

 equipment necessary, including cables, to be attached to the courtroom Digital Evidence

 Presentation System.

          3.   If counsel has any objections to this Pretrial Order, such objections shall be taken up

 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A).

                                                         SO ORDERED:

                                                                s/Clifton L. Corker
                                                         United States Magistrate Judge
                                                    3


Case 2:18-cr-00025-JRG-CRW              Document 17        Filed 04/18/18       Page 3 of 3      PageID
                                              #: 56


File and source

File
gov.uscourts.tned.84581.17.0.pdf
Size
40,246 bytes
SHA-256
00b06e2255dd386637de79fbe29a64fd89e260239046bf6625a45788e353ea24
Our copy
gov.uscourts.tned.84581.17.0.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top