Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Consent Decree — Calvary Chapel Dayton Valley v. Sisolak, No. 3:20-cv-00303-RFB-VCF (D. Nev.)

Consent Decree — Calvary Chapel Dayton Valley v. Sisolak, No. 3:20-cv-00303-RFB-VCF (D. Nev.)

Summary

A Consent Decree, Document 73, filed April 7, 2021 in Calvary Chapel Dayton Valley v. Steve Sisolak, Case No. 3:20-cv-00303-RFB-VCF, in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. It states that the Church sued the Governor and the Attorney General of Nevada and the Sheriff of Lyon County, and that the parties agreed to resolve the matter without further contested litigation. Nevada is permanently enjoined from enforcing Directive 021's and Directive 035's numerical capacity limits on indoor religious gatherings, and from enforcing a percentage capacity limit on them that is less favorable than the highest limit imposed on indoor casinos, gyms, museums and other listed venues. Nevada agrees to pay the Church reasonable attorney's fees and costs.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Consent Decree — Calvary Chapel Dayton Valley v. Sisolak, No. 3:20-cv-00303-RFB-VCF (D. Nev.).” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/gov-uscourts-nvd-143509-73-0-3c2699e4d7/, SHA-256 0244f0ebded6aa86e50b80022272f8745ebf632aa65a8fdd5cf5df310ebd7f53.

Full text

            Case 3:20-cv-00303-RFB-VCF Document 73 Filed 04/07/21 Page 1 of 6


1    AARON D. FORD
       Attorney General
2    CRAIG A. NEWBY (Bar No. 8591)
      Deputy Solicitor General
3    State of Nevada
     Office of the Attorney General
4    100 North Carson Street
     Carson City, Nevada 89701-4717
5    (775) 684-1100 (phone)
6    (775) 684-1108 (fax)
     Email: CNewby@ag.nv.gov
7
     Attorneys for State Defendants
8

9                          UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                                DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10

11   CALVARY CHAPEL DAYTON VALLEY                Case No. 3:20-cv-00303-RFB-VCF

12                 Plaintiff,
      vs.                                                  CONSENT DECREE
13
     STEVE SISOLAK, in his official capacity
14   as Governor of Nevada, et al.,

15                 Defendants.

16

17   I.     INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
18          On March 12, 2020, the Governor of the State of Nevada issued an Emergency
19   Declaration in response to the novel coronavirus that causes COVID-19. See Governor
20   Steve Sisolak, Declaration of Emergency for COVID-19, https://bit.ly/3jnk6CR. The
21   Emergency Declaration remains in effect until the Governor issues an order declaring an
22   end to the emergency. Pursuant to the Emergency Declaration, the Governor issued
23   Emergency Directive 021 on May 29, 2020. See Governor Steve Sisolak, Declaration of
24   Emergency Directive 021 – Phase Two Reopening Plan, https://bit.ly/2MOoYoj. The
25   Directive and related official guidance imposed a 50-person attendance limit on indoor
26   services in houses of worship.
27          Calvary Chapel Dayton Valley (“the Church”) brought this action under 42 U.S.C. §
28   1983 against the Governor and the Attorney General of Nevada (collectively “Nevada” or



                                            Page 1 of 6
           Case 3:20-cv-00303-RFB-VCF Document 73 Filed 04/07/21 Page 2 of 6


1    “the State”) and the Sheriff of Lyon County, each in his official capacity. The Church alleged
2    in its Amended Complaint that the 50-person attendance limit under Directive 021 and
3    related official State guidance violated the Free Exercise, Speech, and Assembly Clauses
4    of the First Amendment. See generally ECF 8. The church requested preliminary and
5    permanent injunctive relief prohibiting the Defendants from enforcing that limit on indoor
6    worship services and a judgment declaring the limit was unconstitutional, both facially and
7    as-applied. Id.; ECF 19 (motion for preliminary injunction). This Court denied the Church’s
8    Motion for Preliminary Injunction, relying largely on South Bay United Pentecostal Church
9    v. Newsom, ––– U.S. ––––, 140 S. Ct. 1613, 207 L.Ed.2d 154 (2020) (mem.), and the Church
10   appealed. See Calvary Chapel Dayton Valley v. Sisolak, 2020 WL 4260438 (D. Nev. June
11   11, 2020).
12         The Ninth Circuit held that the Church demonstrated a likelihood of success on the
13   merits of its free-exercise claim, based on Roman Cath. Diocese of Brooklyn v. Cuomo, 141
14   S. Ct. 63, 67, 208 L. Ed. 2d 206 (2020), that the Church established any enforcement of the
15   50-person attendance limit would cause irreparable harm, and that an injunction was in
16   the public interest. Calvary Chapel Dayton Valley v. Sisolak, 982 F.3d 1228, 1234 (9th Cir.
17   2020), cert. denied, No. 20-639 (U.S. Jan. 25, 2021). Accordingly, the court of appeals
18   reversed, instructed this Court to employ strict scrutiny to its review of Directive 021, and
19   preliminarily enjoined the State from imposing attendance limits on indoor religious
20   gatherings that are less favorable than 25% of the listed fire code capacity. Id. The 25%
21   attendance limit is the same limit that, under Emergency Directive 035, Nevada has
22   imposed on certain commercial entities, including “casinos; bowling alleys, arcades,
23   miniature golf facilities, amusement parks, and theme parks; restaurants, food
24   establishments, breweries, distilleries, and wineries; museums, art galleries, zoos, and
25   aquariums; and gyms, fitness facilities, and fitness studios.” Id. at 1230 n.1; see Governor
26   Steve Sisolak, Declaration of Emergency for Directive 035, https://bit.ly/36B5vhD. The
27   State has subsequently increased the attendance limit to 50% for all applicable entities,
28   including houses of worship. See Governor Steve Sisolak, Declaration of Emergency for



                                              Page 2 of 6
            Case 3:20-cv-00303-RFB-VCF Document 73 Filed 04/07/21 Page 3 of 6


1    Directive 037. The State intends to delegate attendance limits to Nevada counties upon
2    approval of local plans. See Governor State Sisolak, Declaration of Emergency for Directive
3    041.
4           The parties have agreed to enter into this Consent Decree to resolve this matter
5    without further contested litigation. The parties agree that this Consent Decree resolves
6    all issues raised in the Church’s Amended Complaint (ECF 8) and Motion for Preliminary
7    Injunction (ECF 19) and is final and binding on the parties and their officials, agents,
8    employees, and successors.
9    II.    SETTLEMENT OF CLAIMS

10          This Consent Decree is intended to resolve all claims by Calvary Chapel in its
11   Amended Complaint.
12   III.   INJUNCTIVE AND PROSPECTIVE RELIEF
13          Nevada is permanently enjoined from:
14                 1.     Enforcing Directive 021’s and Directive 035’s numerical capacity limits
15   on indoor religious gatherings; and
16                 2.     Enforcing a percentage capacity limit on indoor religious gatherings
17   that is less favorable than the highest of the percentage capacity limits imposed on indoor:
18   (a) casinos; (b) entertainment venues (e.g., movie theaters, bowling alleys, arcades,
19   amusement parks, and theme parks); (c) food and spirits establishments (e.g., restaurants,
20   breweries, distilleries, wineries, and bars); (d) museums, art galleries, zoos, and
21   aquariums; and (e) gyms, fitness facilities, and fitness studios.
22   IV.    DEFINITIONS
23          “Numerical capacity limit” means a fixed maximum number of persons (e.g., “the
24   occupancy shall not exceed 50 persons”).
25          “Percentage capacity limit” means a maximum number of persons expressed as a
26   fraction of 100 that is tied to a facility’s physical size (e.g., “the occupancy shall not exceed
27   25% of the listed fire code”).
28   ///



                                               Page 3 of 6
           Case 3:20-cv-00303-RFB-VCF Document 73 Filed 04/07/21 Page 4 of 6


1    V.    ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS
2                 1.     Nevada agrees to pay the Church reasonable attorney's fees and
3    taxable and non-taxable costs for the work performed and costs incurred in this Court and
4    the Ninth Circuit before the date of this Consent Decree. 1 If necessary State approvals from
5    the Board of Examiners and/or the Legislature’s Interim Finance Committee for any
6    agreement on the amount of reasonable attorney fees and costs are not received by the end
7    of business July 7, 2021, the Church shall file a fee and costs application with this Court
8    by July 30, 2021. Both Nevada and the Church reserve the right to appeal this Court’s
9    disposition of such application.
10                2.     Separate from the previous paragraph, if (a) the Church seeks judicial
11   relief in enforcing this Consent Decree, and (b) the Church prevails in obtaining such relief
12   or Nevada corrects its alleged violation in response to the Church’s request for judicial
13   relief, Nevada agrees that it will pay the reasonable attorney’s fees and costs that the
14   Church incurs in seeking such relief. If an agreement on the amount of reasonable attorney
15   fees and costs cannot be reached, the Church shall file a fee and costs application with this
16   Court within 30 days of the date that this Court grants relief or that Nevada corrects its
17   alleged violation. Both Nevada and the Church reserve the right to appeal this Court’s
18   disposition of such application.
19         APPROVED and ORDERED April __, 2021.
20

21
                                               RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
22                                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
23

24

25

26
           1 The Church’s application for attorney’s fees and non-taxable costs incurred during
27   Appeal No. 20-16169 is presently pending in the Ninth Circuit. See Cir. R. 39-1.6. The
     parties will seek to stay consideration of that application in accordance with the terms of
28
     this stipulated consent decree.


                                             Page 4 of 6
        Case 3:20-cv-00303-RFB-VCF Document 73 Filed 04/07/21 Page 5 of 6


1    AGREED:
2    For Calvary Chapel Dayton Valley:     For the Governor and Attorney General:
3
     /s/ Ryan J. Tucker                    /s/ Craig A. Newby
4    Ryan J. Tucker (AZ Bar 034382)*       Craig A. Newby
     ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM            Deputy Solicitor General
5    15100 N. 90th Street                  STATE OF NEVADA
     Scottsdale, AZ 85260                  OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
6
     Telephone: (480) 444-0020             555 E. Washington, Ave., Ste. 3900
7    rtucker@adflegal.org                  Las Vegas, NV 89101
                                           Telephone: (702) 486-3420
8    *Admitted pro hac vice                cnewby@ag.nv.gov
9
                                           For Sheriff Hunewill:
10
                                           /s/ Brian R. Hardy
11                                         Brian R. Hardy (NV Bar 10068)
                                           MARQUIS AURBACH COFFING
12
                                           10001 Park Run Drive
13                                         Las Vegas, NV 89145
                                           Telephone: (702) 382-0711
14                                         bhardy@maclaw.com
15

16

17

18

19
20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28



                                         Page 5 of 6
          Case 3:20-cv-00303-RFB-VCF Document 73 Filed 04/07/21 Page 6 of 6


1                                 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2          I certify that I am an employee of the State of Nevada, Office of the Attorney General,
3    and that on this 7th day of April, 2021, I electronically filed the foregoing document,
4    CONSENT DECREE, with the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system.
5          Participants in the case who are registered CM/ECF users will be served by the
6    CM/ECF system.
7

8                                                  /s/ Kristalei Wolfe
                                                   Kristalei Wolfe
9                                                  State of Nevada,
                                                   Office of the Attorney General
10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19
20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28



                                             Page 6 of 6


File and source

File
gov.uscourts.nvd.143509.73.0.pdf
Size
109,008 bytes
SHA-256
0244f0ebded6aa86e50b80022272f8745ebf632aa65a8fdd5cf5df310ebd7f53
Our copy
gov.uscourts.nvd.143509.73.0.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top