Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Order Pursuant to Rule 5(f), Exculpatory Evidence — United States v. Dadoun (3:25-cr-00215-RK, Document 8)

Order Pursuant to Rule 5(f), Exculpatory Evidence — United States v. Dadoun (3:25-cr-00215-RK, Document 8)

Summary

Document 8 in Case 3:25-cr-00215-RK, filed 11/13/23, bears the caption of United States of America v. Daniel Dadoun, Mag No. 23mj8137(JSA), in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. Entered under Rule 5(f) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the order refers to what was set forth on the record at the initial appearance of the defendant on the 13th day of November 2023, in the presence of the prosecutor and defense counsel. The Court directs the United States to produce all exculpatory evidence under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and its progeny. It lists dismissal of charges and adverse jury instructions among the consequences of failing to do so in a timely manner.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Order Pursuant to Rule 5(f), Exculpatory Evidence — United States v. Dadoun (3:25-cr-00215-RK, Document 8).” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/gov-uscourts-njd-565817-8-0-37aec93ebe/, SHA-256 150b82e642a21a4fa0c0cd83906a05c7a0e55d41d9ebf2a29ff672e1df7c4ed4.

Full text

Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.

Case 3:25-cr-00215-RK Document8 _ Filed 11/13/23. Page1of1PagelD: 22

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Mag No. 23mj8137(JSA)
v. ORDER
DANIEL DADOUN ,

Defendant.

Pursuant to Rule 5(f) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and as set forth on

the record during the initial appearance of the defendant on this 13th day of November ;

2023, in the presence of both the prosecutor and defense counsel in this matter, the Court
confirms the United States’ continuing obligation to produce all exculpatory evidence to the
defendant pursuant to Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and its progeny, and orders it to
do so. Failing to do so in a timely manner may result in consequences, including, but not limited
to, the Court’s order to produce information, the granting of a continuance, the exclusion of
evidence, adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges, contempt proceedings, or sanctions by

the Court.
s/ANDRE M. ESPINOSA

Hon. André M. Espinosa, USMJ
United States Magistrate Judge

DNJ-CR-021 (REV 4/2021)

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.njd.565817.8.0.pdf
Size
189,519 bytes
SHA-256
150b82e642a21a4fa0c0cd83906a05c7a0e55d41d9ebf2a29ff672e1df7c4ed4
Our copy
gov.uscourts.njd.565817.8.0.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top