Order for Continuance — United States v. Daniel Dadoun, Case 3:25-cr-00215-RK, Mag. No. 23-8137

Summary

Order for Continuance, Document 4 in Case 3:25-cr-00215-RK, filed 11/13/23, in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, under Mag. No. 23-8137 and Hon. Jessica S. Allen, in United States of America v. Daniel Dadoun. The order recites a joint application of Philip R. Sellinger, United States Attorney (Katherine M. Romano, Assistant U.S. Attorney, appearing), and defendant Daniel Dadoun (Peter Katz, Esq., appearing) under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A). It states that the charges result from a lengthy investigation and that the parties seek time to negotiate a protective order and possible plea negotiations. The Court continues the action for approximately 60 days and excludes those days under the Speedy Trial Act of 1974.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors. Page 3 of 3 is not shown because the text could not be recognized reliably.

Case 3:25-cr-00215-RK Document4 Filed 11/13/23. Page 1 of 3 PagelD: 14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : Hon. Jessica S. Allen
V. : Mag. No. 23-8137
DANIEL DADOUN : ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE

1. This matter came before the Court on the joint application of Philip R.
Sellinger, United States Attorney for the District of New Jersey (Katherine M.
Romano, Assistant U.S. Attorney, appearing), and defendant Daniel Dadoun (Peter
Katz, Esq., appearing), for an order granting a continuance under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3161(h)(7)(A) through J anuary 4 2024.

2. This Court granted no § 3161(h)(7)(A) continuances previously in this
case.

3. Counsel for the parties represented that this continuance is necessary
for effective preparation and to permit the parties to attempt to resolve this case
prior to indictment and thereby avoid a trial.

4. Counsel for the United States also represented that this continuance is
necessary to prevent any more non-excludable days under § 3161(h) from expiring.

5. The defendant knows that he has the right under § 3161(b) to have
this matter submitted to a grand jury within thirty days after his arrest.

6. The defendant, through counsel, has consented to this continuance.

7. FOR GOOD CAUSE, THIS COURT FINDS that this case should be

continued for the following reasons:
Case 3:25-cr-00215-RK Document4 Filed 11/13/23 Page 2 of 3 PagelD: 15

a. The charges in this case result from a lengthy investigation, and
the United States and the defendant seek time to negotiate a protective order and
potential production of pre-indictment discovery, which is expected to include
voluminous bank records, which defense counsel will require adequate time to
review.

b. Both the United States and the defendant desire additional time
discuss the case and potentially to engage in plea negotiations.

C. Despite the exercise of diligence, therefore, the circumstances of
this case require giving defense counsel a reasonable amount of additional time for
effective preparation, and provide the parties time to consider plea negotiations,
which could render grand jury proceedings and a trial in this matter unnecessary.

d. Thus, the ends of justice served by granting the continuance |
outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

IT IS, therefore:

ORDERED that this action is continued for a period of approximately 60 days
from November 138, 2023 through January 13, 2024; and it is further

ORDERED that those days are excluded in computing time under the Speedy

Trial Act of 1974; and it is further


File and source

File

gov.uscourts.njd.565817.4.0.pdf

Size

211,787 bytes

SHA-256

8c9d9f401ff9a3e57612b30ea093ee86c4741d23583e990bb266a40e68ca39be

Our copy

gov.uscourts.njd.565817.4.0.pdf

Original

No public link identified.