Order Pursuant to Rule 5(f), Exculpatory Evidence — United States v. Dadoun (2:23-mj-08137-JSA, Document 8)
Summary
Document 8 in Case 2:23-mj-08137-JSA, filed 11/13/23, in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, is an order in United States of America v. Daniel Dadoun (Mag No. 23mj8137(JSA)). It rests on Rule 5(f) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and on what was said on the record at the initial appearance of the defendant on the 13th day of November 2023. The Court orders the United States to produce all exculpatory evidence under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and its progeny. Listed consequences of a late production are an order to produce information, a continuance, exclusion of evidence, adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges, contempt proceedings, or sanctions. The order carries the name of Hon. André M. Espinosa, United States Magistrate Judge.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Order Pursuant to Rule 5(f), Exculpatory Evidence — United States v. Dadoun (2:23-mj-08137-JSA, Document 8).”
Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/gov-uscourts-njd-536411-8-0-4459bafeef/
, SHA-256 3b7fa61104446b256041a8abd5eaa229f93d24ce00cb99b6cbbb4cda5cb0f42c.Full text
Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.
Case 2:23-mj-08137-JSA Document 8 Filed 11/13/23 Page 1 of 1 PagelD: 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Mag No. 23mj8137(JSA) v. ORDER DANIEL DADOUN , Defendant. Pursuant to Rule 5(f) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and as set forth on the record during the initial appearance of the defendant on this 13th day of November 2023, in the presence of both the prosecutor and defense counsel in this matter, the Court confirms the United States’ continuing obligation to produce all exculpatory evidence to the defendant pursuant to Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and its progeny, and orders it to do so. Failing to do so in a timely manner may result in consequences, including, but not limited to, the Court’s order to produce information, the granting of a continuance, the exclusion of evidence, adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges, contempt proceedings, or sanctions by the Court. s/ANDRE M. ESPINOSA Hon. André M. Espinosa, USMJ United States Magistrate Judge DNJ-CR-021 (REV 4/2021)
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.njd.536411.8.0.pdf
- Size
- 189,913 bytes
- SHA-256
- 3b7fa61104446b256041a8abd5eaa229f93d24ce00cb99b6cbbb4cda5cb0f42c
- Our copy
- gov.uscourts.njd.536411.8.0.pdf
- Original
- No public link identified.