Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Order Pursuant to Rule 5(f), Exculpatory Evidence — United States v. Dadoun, Mag No. 23mj8137(JSA)

Order Pursuant to Rule 5(f), Exculpatory Evidence — United States v. Dadoun, Mag No. 23mj8137(JSA)

Summary

Order entered in United States of America v. Daniel Dadoun, Mag No. 23mj8137(JSA), U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, under Rule 5(f) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and as set forth on the record at the defendant's initial appearance on the 13th day of November 2023. The Court confirms the United States' continuing obligation to produce all exculpatory evidence under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and its progeny, and orders it to do so. The order states that a failure to comply in a timely manner may result in consequences, including an order to produce information, a continuance, exclusion of evidence, adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges, contempt proceedings, or sanctions. It is signed s/ANDRE M. ESPINOSA, United States Magistrate Judge.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Order Pursuant to Rule 5(f), Exculpatory Evidence — United States v. Dadoun, Mag No. 23mj8137(JSA).” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/gov-uscourts-njd-536411-7-0-b9be8a732a/, SHA-256 ceb6970162d2a21bacebd6dfbef26568320771d4867730edb32cd6bf0200879d.

Full text

Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Mag No. 23mj8137(JSA)
v. ORDER
DANIEL DADOUN ,

Defendant.

Pursuant to Rule 5(f) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and as set forth on

the record during the initial appearance of the defendant on this 13th day of November

2023, in the presence of both the prosecutor and defense counsel in this matter, the Court
confirms the United States’ continuing obligation to produce all exculpatory evidence to the
defendant pursuant to Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and its progeny, and orders it to
do so. Failing to do so in a timely manner may result in consequences, including, but not limited
to, the Court’s order to produce information, the granting of a continuance, the exclusion of
evidence, adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges, contempt proceedings, or sanctions by

the Court.
s/ANDRE M. ESPINOSA

Hon. André M. Espinosa, USMJ
United States Magistrate Judge

DNJ-CR-021 (REV 4/2021)

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.njd.536411.7.0.pdf
Size
189,916 bytes
SHA-256
ceb6970162d2a21bacebd6dfbef26568320771d4867730edb32cd6bf0200879d
Our copy
gov.uscourts.njd.536411.7.0.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top