Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Superseding Information — United States v. Kevin R. Davis (District of Maryland, 12/13/23)

Superseding Information — United States v. Kevin R. Davis (District of Maryland, 12/13/23)

Summary

A Superseding Information filed 12/13/23 as Document 46 in United States v. Kevin R. Davis, Criminal No. RDB-23-27, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland. Count One, titled Possession of Firearm and Ammunition by a Prohibited Person, alleges that on or about January 6, 2023 in the District of Maryland the defendant, knowing he had previously been convicted of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year, knowingly possessed a firearm and ammunition that were in and affecting commerce, citing 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). A forfeiture section gives notice that the United States will seek forfeiture of any firearm or ammunition involved in the offense on conviction of Count One. The signature block names Erek L. Barron, United States Attorney.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Superseding Information — United States v. Kevin R. Davis (District of Maryland, 12/13/23).” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/gov-uscourts-mdd-529189-46-0-d8fdd8625f/, SHA-256 c4b2432bac655189bc4d82198486d2e5d871f873fc9007ea37ae3815f74128b9.

Full text

Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.

Case 1:23-cr-00027-RDB Document46- Filed 12/13/23. Page1of3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT we
I 32023

PAR: 2022R00689

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

x ay DISTR, °F Map
DEPUTY
V. s CRIMINAL NO. RDB-23-27
KEVIN R. DAVIS, = (Possession of Firearm And
* Ammunition by a Prohibited Person,
Defendant * 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1); Forfeiture, 18
*

U.S.C. § 924(d), 21 U.S.C. § 853(p),
28 U.S.C. § 2461(c))

SUPERSEDING INFORMATION

COUNT ONE
(Possession of Firearm and Ammunition by a Prohibited Person)

The United States Attorney for the District of Maryland charges that:
On or about January 6, 2023, in the District of Maryland, the defendant,
KEVIN R. DAVIS,
knowing he had previously been convicted of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term
exceeding one year, knowingly possessed a firearm and ammunition, to wit, a Ruger SR9C firearm
SN: 334-10383 and ammunition, and the firearm and ammunition were in and affecting commerce.

18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1)
Case 1:23-cr-00027-RDB Document46- Filed 12/13/23 Page 2 of 3

FORFEITURE
The United States Attorney for the District of Maryland further alleges that:
1. Pursuant to Rule 32.2, Fed. R. Crim. P., notice is hereby given to the defendant that
the United States will seek forfeiture as part of any sentence in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 924(d),
21 U.S.C. § 853(p), and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), in the event of the defendant’s conviction under
Count One.

Firearm and Ammunition Forfeiture

2. Upon conviction of Count One, the defendant,
KEVIN R. DAVIS,
shall forfeit to the United States, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 924(d) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461 (c), any

firearm or ammunition involved in the offense, including but not limited to:

a. A Ruger SR9C firearm 334-10383;

b. 9mm ammunition (17 count);

c. 9mm ammunition (17 count);

d. A Glock 22 firearm SN: RF345;

e. A Glock 23 firearm SN: AAMW460;
f. .40 caliber ammunition (15 count);

g. .40 caliber ammunition (12 count); and
h. A Glock 17 firearm, SN: VXN775.

Substitute Assets

a Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(p) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), if any of the property
described above as being subject to forfeiture, as a result of any act or omission by the Defendant:

a. cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence;
Case 1:23-cr-00027-RDB Document 46 Filed 12/13/23 Page 3of3

b. has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third person;
c. has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the Court:
d. has been substantially diminished in value; or
e. has been comingled with other property which cannot be divided without
difficulty,
it is the intent of the United States to seek forfeiture of any other property of the Defendant up to

the value of the property charged with forfeiture in the paragraphs above.

18 U.S.C. § 924(d)
21 U.S.C. § 853(p)
28 U.S.C. § 2461(c)

Cuk L. Barren **
Erek L. Barron
United States Attorney


File and source

File
gov.uscourts.mdd.529189.46.0.pdf
Size
801,132 bytes
SHA-256
c4b2432bac655189bc4d82198486d2e5d871f873fc9007ea37ae3815f74128b9
Our copy
gov.uscourts.mdd.529189.46.0.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top