Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Order — United States v. Ryan Dales (Dkt. 89)

Order — United States v. Ryan Dales (Dkt. 89)

Summary

An order in United States v. Ryan E. Dales, Criminal Case No. GLR-23-026, U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, filed 11/12/24 as Document 89 in Case 1:23-cr-00026-GLR. It denies the defendant's Motion for Reconsideration of Denial of Motion to Suppress, ECF No. 76, without a hearing. The order states that the defendant's argument, that the Court relied on fraud allegations occurring after execution of the search warrant, is incorrect, and that the Court relied on information within the affidavit, including use or ownership of the defendant's cellphone in association with the residence searched. A footnote grants the government's motion for leave to file a sur-reply, ECF No. 88. It is signed by George L. Russell on November 12, 2024.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Order — United States v. Ryan Dales (Dkt. 89).” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/gov-uscourts-mdd-529188-89-0-09af9a9823/, SHA-256 8c494f8270a7e88ed6f877dd5aabf5d4b96898542d87f7176cbde672f6bc4558.

Full text

         Case 1:23-cr-00026-GLR              Document 89           Filed 11/12/24        Page 1 of 1



                            IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                               FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA                             *

                 v.                                  *       Criminal Case No. GLR-23-026

RYAN E. DALES
                          Defendant                  *

                                                   * * *

                                                ORDER

        Pending before the Court is defendant Ryan Dale’s Motion for Reconsideration of Denial

of Motion to Suppress ECF No. 76. The Motion is ripe for disposition. No hearing is necessary. 1

        The gravamen of the Defendant’s argument is that this Court improperly relied upon

information related to fraud allegations occurring after the execution of the search warrant in

question. This is incorrect. The Court relied upon information contained within the affidavit

including but not limited to the use and/or ownership of the Defendant’s cellphone in association

with the residence searched. However there certainly appears to be implied or some evidence of

other ongoing fraudulent activity in the affidavit referenced by the government.

        As a result, for these reasons as well as the reasons outlined in the government’s opposition

and surreply and reasons stated previously on the record the Motion for Reconsideration will be

DENIED.




                                                                            /s/
November 12, 2024                                            _____________________________
                                                             George L. Russell, III
                                                             United States District Chief Judge


1
 Also pending before the Court is a Motion by the government for leave to file a sur-reply ECF No. 88. The Court
will grant that motion for leave to file a sur-reply and consider the sir-reply.

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.mdd.529188.89.0.pdf
Size
77,304 bytes
SHA-256
8c494f8270a7e88ed6f877dd5aabf5d4b96898542d87f7176cbde672f6bc4558
Our copy
gov.uscourts.mdd.529188.89.0.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top