Order of Forfeiture (Money Judgment) — United States v. Damian Halfkenny (Dkt. 10.1)
Summary
Document 10-1, filed June 10, 2026, is the form of Order of Forfeiture (Money Judgment) in United States v. Damian Halfkenny, Criminal No. 26-CR-10107-NMG, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts. It recites a one-count Information charging Wire Fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1343, a guilty plea to Count One on April 14, 2026, and a plea agreement in which the Defendant agreed to forfeit $21,332.79 as proceeds. The order provides that the Defendant shall forfeit $21,332.79 under 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), that the court retains jurisdiction to enforce it, and that it is included in the sentence and criminal judgment. The signature block names Nathaniel M. Gorton, Senior United States District Judge.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Order of Forfeiture (Money Judgment) — United States v. Damian Halfkenny (Dkt. 10.1).”
Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/gov-uscourts-mad-298904-10-1-e5c3eaf635/
, SHA-256 6bb523af3c52bd8e317ebbc4915f437169749c7a5195bacb4810c15fe80db506.Full text
Case 1:26-cr-10107-NMG Document 10-1 Filed 06/10/26 Page 1 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )
)
v. ) Criminal No. 26-CR-10107-NMG
)
DAMIAN HALFKENNY, )
)
Defendant. )
ORDER OF FORFEITURE (MONEY JUDGMENT)
GORTON, S.J.
WHEREAS, on April 10, 2026, the United States Attorney for the District of
Massachusetts filed a one-count Information, charging defendant Damian Halfkenny (the
“Defendant”), with Wire Fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343 (Count One);
WHEREAS, the Information also included a forfeiture allegation, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 981(a)(1)(C) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), which provided notice that the United States intended to
seek the forfeiture, upon conviction of the Defendant of the offense alleged in Count One of the
Information, of any property, real or personal, which constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds
traceable to the commission of the offense;
WHEREAS, such property specifically included, without limitation:
a. $21,332.79, to be entered in the form of a forfeiture money
judgment;
WHEREAS, the Information further provided that, if any of the above-described
forfeitable property, as a result of any act or omission by the Defendant, (a) cannot be located
upon the exercise of due diligence; (b) has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third
party; (c) has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the Court; (d) has been substantially
1
Case 1:26-cr-10107-NMG Document 10-1 Filed 06/10/26 Page 2 of 3
diminished in value; or (e) has been commingled with other property which cannot be divided
without difficulty, the United States is entitled to seek forfeiture of any other property of the
Defendant, up to the value of such assets, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(p), as incorporated by 28
U.S.C. § 2461(c);
WHEREAS, on April 14, 2026, at a hearing pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of
Criminal Procedure, the Defendant pled guilty to Count One of the Information, pursuant to a
written plea agreement that he signed on April 10, 2026;
WHEREAS, in Section 6 of the plea agreement, the Defendant agreed to forfeit to the
United States $21,332.79 on the grounds that such amount represented proceeds the Defendant
derived from his offense;
WHEREAS, based on the Defendant’s admissions in the written plea agreement and his
guilty plea on April 14, 2026, the United States is entitled to an Order of Forfeiture consisting of
a personal money judgment against the Defendant, in the amount of $21,332.79, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c);
WHEREAS, the amount of $21,332.79 constitutes proceeds that the Defendant obtained
as a result of violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1343; and
WHEREAS, Rule 32.2(c)(1) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure provides that
Ano ancillary proceeding is required to the extent that the forfeiture consists of a money
judgment.@
ACCORDINGLY, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED:
1. The Defendant shall forfeit to the United States the sum of $21,332.79, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c).
2
Case 1:26-cr-10107-NMG Document 10-1 Filed 06/10/26 Page 3 of 3
2. This Court shall retain jurisdiction in the case for the purpose of enforcing this
Order.
3. The United States may, at any time, move pursuant to Rule 32.2(e) of the Federal
Rules of Criminal Procedure to amend this Order to substitute property having a value not to
exceed the amount set forth in Paragraph 1 to satisfy the money judgment in whole or in part.
4. The United States may, at any time, conduct pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(3) of the
Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and 21 U.S.C. § 853(m), as incorporated by 28
U.S.C.§ 2461(c), any discovery to identify, locate or dispose of forfeitable property or substitute
assets, including, but not limited to, depositions and requests for documents, electronically stored
information, and tangible things.
5. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(4), this Order shall be included in the sentence
pronounced and imposed by the Court at the sentencing hearing, and in the criminal judgment
entered by this Court against the Defendant.
NATHANIEL M. GORTON
Senior United States District Judge
Dated:
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.mad.298904.10.1.pdf
- Size
- 151,384 bytes
- SHA-256
- 6bb523af3c52bd8e317ebbc4915f437169749c7a5195bacb4810c15fe80db506
- Our copy
- gov.uscourts.mad.298904.10.1.pdf
- Original
- No public link identified.