Order Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure — United States v. Ashley Spike (Dkt. 30)
Summary
Document 30, an Order Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure dated February 24, 2026 and filed February 25, 2026 in United States of America v. Ashley Spike, No. 1:26-cr-10031-RGS-4, in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. The order cites the Due Process Protections Act and Rule 5(f) and reminds the United States of its obligation to disclose in a timely manner all evidence favorable to the defendant or that tends to cast doubt on the United States' case, as required by Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963). It states that failure to comply may result in consequences including the exclusion of evidence and contempt proceedings. It is signed /s/ by Jennifer C. Boal, United States Magistrate Judge.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Order Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure — United States v. Ashley Spike (Dkt. 30).”
Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/gov-uscourts-mad-295483-30-0-b9ce67f34a/
, SHA-256 c1e648a5d9eebef6fd6fa75c857b9c55492ea65fdb163cc1c89836274b5fab41.Full text
Case 1:26-cr-10031-RGS Document 30 Filed 02/25/26 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
No. 1:26-cr-10031-RGS-4
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
Ashley Spike
ORDER PURSUANT TO
RULE 5 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
February 24, 2026
Boal, U.S.M.J.
Pursuant to the Due Process Protections Act, Pub. L. No. 116-182, 134 Stat. 894 (Oct. 21,
2020) and Rule 5(f) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the United States is reminded of
its obligation to disclose in a timely manner all exculpatory evidence to the defendant, that is, all
evidence that is favorable to the defendant or tends to cast doubt on the United States’ case, as
required by Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and its progeny. Failure to comply with this
order may result in consequences, including, but not limited to, the reversal of any conviction,
the exclusion of evidence, adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges, contempt proceedings,
disciplinary action, and/or sanctions by the Court.
/ s / Jennifer C. Boal
JENNIFER C. BOAL
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Page 1 of 1
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.mad.295483.30.0.pdf
- Size
- 120,925 bytes
- SHA-256
- c1e648a5d9eebef6fd6fa75c857b9c55492ea65fdb163cc1c89836274b5fab41
- Our copy
- gov.uscourts.mad.295483.30.0.pdf
- Original
- No public link identified.