Order Pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5(f) — United States v. Sniders Jean-Jacques et al. (Dkt. 15)
Summary
Document 15, an Order Pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5(f) dated February 9, 2026, in United States v. Sniders Jean-Jacques, et al., Case 1:26-cr-10031-RGS, in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. Citing the Due Process Protections Act, the order reminds the United States of its obligation to disclose in a timely manner all exculpatory evidence to the defendant, as required by Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and states that categories of exculpatory evidence are set out in Local Rule 116.2. It states that failure to comply may result in consequences including contempt proceedings and disciplinary action. It is signed /s/ by Jennifer C. Boal, United States Magistrate Judge.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Order Pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5(f) — United States v. Sniders Jean-Jacques et al. (Dkt. 15).”
Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/gov-uscourts-mad-295483-15-0-959fa12473/
, SHA-256 8b2559aaed14e9481878e6f85231eb9b0d9b2e83b55874c0671d7499f096c5cb.Full text
Case 1:26-cr-10031-RGS Document 15 Filed 02/09/26 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
USA
Criminal Action No.
v. 1:26−CR−10031−RGS
SNIDERS JEAN−JACQUES, ET AL.
ORDER PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 5(f)
Jennifer C. Boal U.S.M.J.
Pursuant to the Due Process Protections Act, Public Law 116−182, 134 Sta. 894 (Oct. 21, 2020) and Rule
5(f) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, this court issues the following Order. The United States is
reminded of its obligation to disclose in a timely manner all exculpatory evidence to the defendant[s], that is,
all evidence that is material and favorable to the defendant[s] or tends to cast doubt on the United States' case,
as required by Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and its progeny. Specific categories for exculpatory
evidence that must be provided to the defense are set out in Local Rule 116.2. The failure to comply with this
Order may result in consequences including, but not limited to, the reversal of any conviction, the exclusion of
evidence, adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges, contempt proceedings, disciplinary action, and/or
sanctions by the court.
/s/ − Jennifer C. Boal
Dated: February 9, 2026 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.mad.295483.15.0.pdf
- Size
- 18,457 bytes
- SHA-256
- 8b2559aaed14e9481878e6f85231eb9b0d9b2e83b55874c0671d7499f096c5cb
- Our copy
- gov.uscourts.mad.295483.15.0.pdf
- Original
- No public link identified.