Order Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure — United States v. Tanya Pierre (Dkt. 38)
Summary
An Order Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure in United States of America v. Tanya Pierre, No. 1:26-cr-10030-RGS-4, in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, dated February 26, 2026 and filed as Document 38. Citing the Due Process Protections Act and Rule 5(f), the order reminds the United States of its obligation to disclose in a timely manner all exculpatory evidence to the defendant, as required by Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963). It states that failure to comply may result in consequences including the exclusion of evidence, dismissal of charges and disciplinary action. It bears the signature of Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Boal.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Order Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure — United States v. Tanya Pierre (Dkt. 38).”
Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/gov-uscourts-mad-295477-38-0-a80df8b7f4/
, SHA-256 dc03501378af1dceeefaa10c4ed26296c429279dddbe1b896c29ca6311ace4d3.Full text
Case 1:26-cr-10030-RGS Document 38 Filed 02/26/26 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
No. 1:26-cr-10030-RGS-4
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
Tanya Pierre
ORDER PURSUANT TO
RULE 5 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
February 26, 2026
Boal, U.S.M.J.
Pursuant to the Due Process Protections Act, Pub. L. No. 116-182, 134 Stat. 894 (Oct. 21,
2020) and Rule 5(f) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the United States is reminded of
its obligation to disclose in a timely manner all exculpatory evidence to the defendant, that is, all
evidence that is favorable to the defendant or tends to cast doubt on the United States’ case, as
required by Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and its progeny. Failure to comply with this
order may result in consequences, including, but not limited to, the reversal of any conviction,
the exclusion of evidence, adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges, contempt proceedings,
disciplinary action, and/or sanctions by the Court.
/ s / Jennifer C. Boal
JENNIFER C. BOAL
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Page 1 of 1
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.mad.295477.38.0.pdf
- Size
- 120,102 bytes
- SHA-256
- dc03501378af1dceeefaa10c4ed26296c429279dddbe1b896c29ca6311ace4d3
- Our copy
- gov.uscourts.mad.295477.38.0.pdf
- Original
- No public link identified.