Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Final Status Report and Order of Excludable Delay — United States v. Jasmine Murphy (Dkt. 47)

Final Status Report and Order of Excludable Delay — United States v. Jasmine Murphy (Dkt. 47)

Summary

A Final Status Report and Order of Excludable Delay, Document 47, dated February 4, 2026 in United States of America v. Jasmine Murphy, No. 24-cr-10379-RGS, in the United States District Court, District of Massachusetts. The order states that a final status conference was scheduled for February 6, 2026 and that the parties filed a joint motion asking that it be cancelled because the defendant intends to file a motion for a R. 11 hearing shortly. It states that the hearing is cancelled and the case is transferred to the District Judge Stearns. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8), it directs the Clerk to enter excludable time from February 6, 2026 to the date the parties appear before the district court. It is signed M. Page Kelley, United States Magistrate Judge.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Final Status Report and Order of Excludable Delay — United States v. Jasmine Murphy (Dkt. 47).” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/gov-uscourts-mad-278747-47-0-7b56067d1e/, SHA-256 a7127549c31d88d32e3b93856c0b051f502dbb329a8c9e217c12c5fb5226e810.

Full text

        Case 1:24-cr-10379-RGS            Document 47         Filed 02/04/26      Page 1 of 2

                                   UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                                    DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS



NO. 24-cr-10379-RGS



                                      UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                                                         v.

                                             JASMINE MURPHY

                                    FINAL STATUS REPORT AND
                                   ORDER OF EXCLUDABLE DELAY

                                           Date: February 4, 2026
KELLEY, U.S.M.J.

      The defendant had a final status conference scheduled for February 6, 2026. The parties filed a

joint motion asking that the conference be cancelled as defendant intends to file a motion for a R. 11

hearing shortly. The hearing is cancelled and the case is transferred to the District Judge Stearns.

      With the agreement of the parties, this court finds and concludes, pursuant to the provisions of 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8) and Section 5(b)(7)(b) of the Plan for Prompt Disposition of Criminal Cases in the

United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts (Statement of Time Limits Adopted by the

Court and Procedures for Implementing Them, Effective December 2008), that the interests of justice,

i.e., allowing the parties time to prepare for the R. 11 hearing, outweighs the best interests of the public

and the defendant for a trial within seventy days of the return of an indictment. Accordingly, it is hereby

ordered that, the Clerk of this Court enter excludable time for the period of February 6, 2026, to the date

the parties appear before the district court. 1



1
 The parties are advised that under the provisions of Rule 2(b) of the Rules for United States
Magistrate Judges in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, any party
may move for reconsideration by a district judge of the determination(s) and order(s) set forth here
within fourteen (14) days after receipt of a copy of this order, unless a different time is prescribed by
this court or the district judge. The party seeking reconsideration shall file with the Clerk of this
                                                   -1-
        Case 1:24-cr-10379-RGS           Document 47        Filed 02/04/26      Page 2 of 2




                                                 / s / M. Page Kelley
                                               M. PAGE KELLEY
                                               UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE




Court, and serve upon all parties, a written notice of the motion which shall specifically designate
the order or part thereof to be reconsidered and the basis for the objection. The district judge, upon
timely motion, shall reconsider the magistrate's order and set aside any portion found to be clearly
erroneous in fact or contrary to law. The parties are further advised that the United States Court of
Appeals for this Circuit has indicated that failure to comply with this rule shall preclude further
appellate review. See Keating v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 848 F.2d 271 (1st Cir.
March 31, 1988); United States v. Emiliano Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4 (1st Cir. 1986); Park Motor
Mart, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 616 F.2d 603 (1st Cir. 1980); United States v. Vega, 678 F.2d 376,
378-379 (1st Cir. 1982); Scott v. Schweiker, 702 F.2d 13, 14 (1st Cir. 1983); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S.
140, 106 S. Ct. 466 (1985).
                                                  -2-

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.mad.278747.47.0.pdf
Size
127,109 bytes
SHA-256
a7127549c31d88d32e3b93856c0b051f502dbb329a8c9e217c12c5fb5226e810
Our copy
gov.uscourts.mad.278747.47.0.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top