Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Judgment in a Civil Case — The Arc of Iowa v. Reynolds (Dkt. 115)

Judgment in a Civil Case — The Arc of Iowa v. Reynolds (Dkt. 115)

Summary

A Judgment in a Civil Case, Document 115 filed November 2, 2022 in The Arc of Iowa, et al. v. Kim Reynolds, et al., Civil Number 4:21-cv-00264-RP-HCA, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa. It marks the decision as by the Court and orders that Defendants Reynolds and Lebo's Motion to Dismiss is granted in part and denied in part, and that the Defendant Districts' Motions to Dismiss are denied. It orders that Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment is granted. The Court declares that Iowa Code section 280.31 cannot be cited as the only basis to deny a student's request for reasonable modification or accommodation under Title II of the ADA or section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act that includes requiring others to wear masks.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Judgment in a Civil Case — The Arc of Iowa v. Reynolds (Dkt. 115).” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/gov-uscourts-iasd-77124-115-0-9ea2063811/, SHA-256 7ad4b611392bf6f12220d94c6676778241c0bab4315ec3449a85b27b73ff2ce9.

Full text

        Case 4:21-cv-00264-RP-HCA Document 115 Filed 11/02/22 Page 1 of 1




                           UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                              SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA



The Arc of Iowa, et al.

                                               CIVIL NUMBER: 4:21-cv-00264-RP-HCA
                          Plaintiff(s),

 v.                                            JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

Kim Reynolds, et al.



                          Defendant(s),


         JURY VERDICT. This action came before the Court for trial by jury. The issues have
 been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.


      ✔ DECISION BY COURT. This action came before the Court. The issues have been
 considered and a decision has been rendered.

         IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
Defendants’ Reynolds and Lebo’s Motion to Dismiss is granted in part and denied in part. The
Court grants Defendants’ Motion as to Plaintiffs’ claims for injunctive relief and their claim for
declaratory relief under the ARPA. The Court denies Defendants’ Motion as to Plaintiffs’ other
claims. Defendant Districts’ Motions to Dismiss are denied. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary
Judgment is granted. The Court declares that the phrase ‘other provision[s] of law’ as it is used
inDate:
   Iowa Code section 280.31 includes Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
        November 2, 2022
and section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act. The Court further declares that Iowa Code section
280.31 cannot be cited as the only basis to deny a student’s
                                                       CLERK,request
                                                                U.S.for reasonable
                                                                     DISTRICT       modification
                                                                                  COURT
or accommodation made under Title II of the ADA or section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act that
includes requiring others to wear masks.               /s/ B. German
                                                       _____________________________
                                                       By: Deputy Clerk

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.iasd.77124.115.0.pdf
Size
1,941,786 bytes
SHA-256
7ad4b611392bf6f12220d94c6676778241c0bab4315ec3449a85b27b73ff2ce9
Our copy
gov.uscourts.iasd.77124.115.0.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top