Exhibit F - Matthew L. Venezia Bio (Dkt. 248.6)

Summary

Exhibit F (Document 248-6) in Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA, entered on the FLSD docket 04/26/2021, is a page on Matthew L. Venezia, a partner with Browne George Ross O'Brien Annaguey & Ellis LLP who represents clients with a particular emphasis on intellectual property and business disputes. It states that before joining the firm Mr. Venezia was an associate in TroyGould PC's litigation department and served as in-house counsel for Fidelity National Title Group, and that he graduated cum laude from Washington University School of Law in St. Louis. Its listed representations include Atari, Black Knight against antitrust claims brought by PennyMac, and ListReports against trade secret and false advertising claims in which NexGen HBM sought in excess of $50 million in damages.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.

Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA Document 248-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/26/2021 Page 1 of 2

EXHIBIT F
Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA Document 248-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/26/2021 Page 2 of 2

BG 2 Bre WNI GEORGI Ross ABOUT US ATTORNEYS PRACTICE AREAS COMMUNITY OUTREACH CONSULTING NEWS CONTACT US
O BritN ANNAGUEY & ELLIS LLP

Matthew L. Venezia is a partner with Browne George Ross O'Brien Annaguey & Ellis LLP. Mr.
Venezia represents his clients in weighty and challenging matters, with a particular emphasis
on intellectual property and business disputes concerning various forms of unfair competition.

Prior to joining Browne George Ross O'Brien Annaguey & Ellis LLP, Mr. Venezia was an
associate in TroyGould PC's litigation department, where he maintained a complex
commercial litigation practice. Before joining TroyGould PC, Mr. Venezia served as in-house
counsel for Fidelity National Title Group.

Mr. Venezia graduated cum laude from Washington University School of Law in St. Louis
where he served as a Senior Editor for the Washington University Law Review.

Notable Representations:

« Commercial Litigation
e Trademarks

¢ Copyrights

e Trade Secrets

e Real Estate

Matthew Venezia

Partner

firm.com Notable Representations:
lronhawk Technologies v. Dropbox. Currently represent lronhawk Technologies in a
trademark infringement case against Dropbox, alleging that Dropbox infringes upon
| DOWNLOAD VCARD | lronhawk Technologies’ SmartSync® trademark. While the district court originally
dismissed lronhawk Technologies’ claims on summary judgment, that decision was
reversed in its entirety by the Ninth Circuit in a to-be-published opinion.

e Atari Cases. Currently represent Atari in a number of actions seeking to protect its
trademarks and copyrights from infringement. Have previously obtained several
settlements of such cases for Atari, on confidential terms.

¢ Nexus Pharmaceuticals v. Central Admixture Pharmacy Services (CAPS). Defended
CAPS against unfair competition claims premised upon argument that one if its
products was sold in violation of the Drug Quality and Security Act. CAPS’ motion to
dismiss was granted in its entirety on preemption grounds. (Currently represent CAPS in
Nexus Pharmaceuticals’ appeal of this ruling in the Ninth Circuit.)

e PennyMac Loan Services v. Black Knight, Inc. Defended Black Knight against antitrust
claims brought by PennyMac alleging that Black Knight sought to monopolize the
market for mortgage servicing software. Obtained transfer of claims to Black Knight's
home district of the Middle District of Florida.

e NexGen HBM vy. ListReports. Defended ListReports against trade secret and false
advertising claims, where NexGen HBM sought in excess of $50 million in damages. After
litigating for more than three years, NexGen HBM voluntarily dismissed its claims with
prejudice prior to the hearing on ListReports’ motion for summary judgment.
Allergan v. Imprimis. Defended Imprimis against unfair competition and false
advertising claims brought by Allergan. Allergan requested $7.2 million in lost profits
and as much as $54 million in disgorged profits, but the jury ultimately awarded
Allergan just $48,500 for lost profits and zero dollars for disgorged profits.

Solomon Capital v. Lion Biotechnologies. Represented Lion Biotechnologies in
connection with its appeal of an order granting a motion to dismiss of its fraud-based
counterclaims and defenses against a purported broker seeking compensation for its
failed attempts to raise capital. The New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division,
reversed the lower court's decision in its entirety and denied the motion to dismiss.
(Representation at prior firm.)

Education

¢ J.D.: Washington University School of Law, 2012
¢ B.A.: University of Missouri, Sociology, 2009

© Copyright 2020 Browne Ge =n Annaguey & Ellis LLP All Right

Privacy Policy

Google Chrome 90.0.4430.85 8:52:57 AM 4/26/2021 Windows 10 Pro 64-bit Build 19042


File and source

File

gov.uscourts.flsd.590042.248.6.pdf

Size

620,582 bytes

SHA-256

e8caa7bf282df9201ccdccd1f6634baeded41494a7b00435ee1780ce3f42db24

Our copy

gov.uscourts.flsd.590042.248.6.pdf

Original

archive.org