Special Verdict for Forfeiture — United States v. Emmet Bowens (Dkt. 206)

Summary

A Special Verdict for Forfeiture form filed December 15, 2025 in United States v. Emmet Bowens, Case No. 6:21-cr-141-RBD-NWH, in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Orlando Division (Document 206). The form begins "We the Jury, having found defendant" guilty of one or more of the offenses charged in Counts One, Two and Four through Six of the Indictment. It lists approximately $250,610.82, $250,668.76 and $115,321.18 seized from Barclays Bank accounts in the name of Emmet Bowens, with Yes and No lines for whether each represents proceeds of the wire fraud offense charged in Count One or Count Two or is property involved in the money laundering offense charged in Count Four, Five or Six. It closes with lines for the foreperson and a date.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

Case 6:21-cr-00141-RBD-NWH         Document 206    Filed 12/15/25   Page 1 of 3 PageID 593




                           UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                            MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
                                ORLANDO DIVISION

  UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

  v.                                              Case No. 6:21-cr-141-RBD-NWH

  EMMET BOWENS
    a/k/a Emmitt Bowens

                      SPECIAL VERDICT FOR FORFEITURE

        We the Jury, having found defendant Emmet Bowes guilty of one or more of

  the offenses charged in Counts One, Two and Four through Six of the Indictment,

  hereby find as follows:

               1.     Approximately $250,610.82 seized from Barclays Bank
                      account number 1300066779467 held in the name of Emmet
                      Bowens.

                      a.     Represents property constituting, or derived from,
                             proceeds obtained, directly or indirectly, from the wire
                             fraud offense charged in Count One:

                             Yes                       No

                      b.     Represents property constituting, or derived from,
                             proceeds obtained, directly or indirectly, from the wire
                             fraud offense charged in Count Two:

                             Yes                       No

                      c.     Constitutes property involved in the money laundering
                             offense charged in Count Four:

                             Yes                       No
Case 6:21-cr-00141-RBD-NWH    Document 206    Filed 12/15/25   Page 2 of 3 PageID 594




             2.    Approximately $250,668.76 seized from Barclays Bank
                   account number 130006698297 held in the name of Emmet
                   Bowens.

                   a.   Represents property constituting, or derived from,
                        proceeds obtained, directly or indirectly, from the wire
                        fraud offense charged in Count One:

                        Yes                       No

                   b.   Represents property constituting, or derived from,
                        proceeds obtained, directly or indirectly, from the wire
                        fraud offense charged in Count Two:

                        Yes                       No


                   c.   Constitutes property involved in the money laundering
                        offense charged in Count Five:

                        Yes                       No


             3.    Approximately $115,321.18 seized from Barclays Bank
                   account number 130006698303 held in the name of Emmet
                   Bowens.

                   a.   Represents property constituting, or derived from,
                        proceeds obtained, directly or indirectly, from the wire
                        fraud offense charged in Count One:

                        Yes                       No

                   b.   Represents property constituting, or derived from,
                        proceeds obtained, directly or indirectly, from the wire
                        fraud offense charged in Count Two:

                        Yes                       No




                                        2
Case 6:21-cr-00141-RBD-NWH    Document 206   Filed 12/15/25   Page 3 of 3 PageID 595




                   c.   Constitutes property involved in the money laundering
                        offense charged in Count Six:

                        Yes                      No


  SO SAY WE ALL:



  FOREPERSON                                     DATE




                                       3


File and source

File

gov.uscourts.flmd.396523.206.0.pdf

Size

65,127 bytes

SHA-256

f34fd8d2f30a1e0c9055b536fd3994eedefe1be5a7e0b219b61e617b35df0f5c

Our copy

gov.uscourts.flmd.396523.206.0.pdf

Original

No public link identified.