Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents ADR Certification by Parties and Counsel — Children's Health Defense v. Facebook, Inc. (Dkt. 61)

ADR Certification by Parties and Counsel — Children's Health Defense v. Facebook, Inc. (Dkt. 61)

Summary

This form is the ADR certification by parties and counsel filed in Children's Health Defense v. Facebook, Inc., et al., Case No C 3:20-cv-05787. The certification states that each signer has read the Alternative Dispute Resolution Procedures Handbook, discussed the available dispute resolution options, and considered whether the case might benefit from them. It is dated 11/03/2020, with /s/ Neil Brown shown as party and /s/ Mark R. Caramanica (pro hac vice) as attorney. Counsel also certifies a discussion of ADR selection with counsel for the other parties.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“ADR Certification by Parties and Counsel — Children's Health Defense v. Facebook, Inc. (Dkt. 61).” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/gov-uscourts-cand-364478-61-0-b462741238/, SHA-256 74f20abee5981cedd5d9e47cf50934b64707f88e22c1130d199ec94be301fde0.

Full text

Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.

Case 3:20-cv-05787-SI Document 61 Filed 11/03/20 Page 1of1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Children's Health Defense, CASE No C 3:20-cv-05787

Plaintiff(s) ADR CERTIFICATION BY
m PARTIES AND COUNSEL

Facebook, Inc., et al.,
Defendant(s)

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8(b) and ADR L.R. 3-5 (b), each of the undersigned certifies that he or
she has:

1) Read the handbook entitled “Alternative Dispute Resolution Procedures Handbook”
(available at cand.uscourts.gov/adr).

2) Discussed with each other the available dispute resolution options provided by the Court
and private entities; and

3) Considered whether this case might benefit from any of the available dispute resolution

options.
Date: 11/03/2020 /s/ Neil Brown
Party
Date: 1 1/03/2020 /s/ Mark R. Caramanica (pro hac vice)
Attorney

Counsel further certifies that he or she has discussed the selection of an ADR process with
counsel for the other parties to the case. Based on that discussion, the parties:

£1 intend to stipulate to an ADR process

E) prefer to discuss ADR selection with the Assigned Judge at the case management
conference

Date: 11/03/2020 Mark R. Caramanica (pro hac vice)

Attorney

E-file this form in ECF using event name: “ADR Certification (ADR LR 3-5 b) of Discussion of ADR

Form ADR-Cert rev. 1-15-2019

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.cand.364478.61.0.pdf
Size
267,003 bytes
SHA-256
74f20abee5981cedd5d9e47cf50934b64707f88e22c1130d199ec94be301fde0
Our copy
gov.uscourts.cand.364478.61.0.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top