Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Stipulation and Proposed Order to Continue Sentencing Hearing — United States v. Gurjeet Bath (Dkt. 33)

Stipulation and Proposed Order to Continue Sentencing Hearing — United States v. Gurjeet Bath (Dkt. 33)

Summary

A Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue Sentencing Hearing in United States of America v. Gurjeet Bath, Document 33, filed January 8, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California. It states that the matter is a PPP fraud case in which the dollar loss and the fact of restitution are dispositive issues, and that only that day the SBA confirmed to the Government that full restitution has been paid. It adds that the PSR was prepared without reference to restitution having been paid in full. The parties ask to move the January 26, 2026 sentencing for a period of 60 days, to March 23, 2026, or to a date convenient to the Court. The stipulation carries /s/ signatures for Joseph Barton, Assistant United States Attorney, and Roger S. Bonakdar, attorney for the defendant.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Stipulation and Proposed Order to Continue Sentencing Hearing — United States v. Gurjeet Bath (Dkt. 33).” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/gov-uscourts-caed-451006-33-0-72c3f0d7d5/, SHA-256 f9fad5b900dceeb76f2d43d7cae4fa63698a6f988efba34b734f310508bc76f8.

Full text

     Case 1:24-cr-00198-JLT-SKO             Document 33     Filed 01/08/26      Page 1 of 3
                                                                  (SPACE BELOW FOR FILING STAMP ONLY)
 1

 2
      Roger S. Bonakdar, #253920
 3    2344 TULARE ST., SUITE 200
      FRESNO, CALIFORNIA 93721
 4    PHONE (559) 495-1545
      FAX (559) 495-1527
 5    Attorney for DEFENDANT, GURJEET BATH
 6
                               IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
 7
                                  EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
 8
      UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                           CASE NO. 1:24-CR-00198-001
 9
                                     Plaintiff,           STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
10                                                        ORDER TO CONTINUE SENTENCING
                              v.                          HEARING
11
      GURJEET BATH,                                       Sentencing: January 26, 2026
12                                   Defendant.
13

14
              DEFENDANT, GURJEET BATH’s Sentencing Hearing is currently scheduled for
15
      January 26, 2026. The parties request a continuance of Sentencing in this matter, so that matters
16
      related to restitution can be investigated and addressed, prior to sentencing.
17
              WHEREAS this matter is a PPP fraud case, where the dollar loss and the fact of
18
      restitution are dispositive issues.
19
              WHEREAS Defendant has circulated proof of payment to the SBA by way of
20
      cancelled/deposited checks to the Government, over a month ago. The Government made every
21
      effort to confirm the fact of payments, via the SBA, and the parties worked together to get this
22
      verified.
23
              WHEREAS the PSR has been prepared without reference for or consideration of
24
      restitution having been paid in full.
25
              WHEREAS only today the SBA has confirmed to the Government that full restitution
26
      has been paid.
27

28

                                                 1
                       STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE SENTENCING HEARING
     Case 1:24-cr-00198-JLT-SKO          Document 33         Filed 01/08/26      Page 2 of 3
 1           WHEREAS the fact that restitution has been paid in full is dispositive as to sentencing,

 2    and needs to be considered by Probation and addressed by the Defense in informal objections

 3    and the interactive process attendant to the final PSR and recommendations for a variance or

 4    departure from sentencing guidelines.

 5           WHEREAS Defendant’s counsel needs to be afforded opportunity to respond to the

 6    Final PSR (after the interactive process of informal and formal objections), and submit a

 7    sentencing brief; this is not practicable with the Sentencing as currently set.

 8           WHEREAS in light of the above, request is made for a continuance of the January 26,

 9    2026, Sentencing hearing for a period of 60 days.

10           WHEREAS the Parties request a renewed Sentencing Referral Schedule be issued,
11    based on the continued sentencing date, for any informal and formal objections and sentencing
12    brief due dates.
13           WHEREAS it is understood that the Defense does not intend to request any further
14    continuances of sentencing attendant to this restitution issue, or otherwise without new or
15    otherwise good cause.
16           THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED by and between the Parties that the January 26,
17    2026, Sentencing hearing be continued to March 23, 2026, or to a date convenient to the Court.
18           IT IS SO STIPULATED:
      Dated: January 8, 2026                                ERIC GRANT
19                                                          United States Attorney
20

21                                                     By: /s/ Joseph Barton
                                                           JOSEPH BARTON
22                                                         Assistant United States Attorney

23    Dated: January 8, 2026                                BONAKDAR LAW FIRM

24
                                                        By: /s/ Roger S. Bonakdar
25                                                          ROGER S. BONAKDAR
                                                            Attorney for Defendant
26
                                                            GURJEET BATH
27
                                       [Order Continues on Next Page]
28

                                              2
                    STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE SENTENCING HEARING
     Case 1:24-cr-00198-JLT-SKO         Document 33        Filed 01/08/26      Page 3 of 3
 1                                                ORDER

 2           Upon the Parties’ stipulation and for good cause shown, Defendant, GURJEET BATH’s

 3    Sentencing Hearing is continued from January 26, 2026, to March 23, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. The

 4    Clerk shall issue a new schedule for informal and formal objections and sentencing briefs to be

 5    due, based on the continued sentencing date.

 6           All orders not expressly modified by this order remain in full force and effect.

 7    IT IS SO ORDERED.

 8    Dated: _____________                           _______________________________
                                                     HON. JENNIFER L. THURSTON
 9                                                   UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

                                              3
                    STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE SENTENCING HEARING


File and source

File
gov.uscourts.caed.451006.33.0.pdf
Size
109,803 bytes
SHA-256
f9fad5b900dceeb76f2d43d7cae4fa63698a6f988efba34b734f310508bc76f8
Our copy
gov.uscourts.caed.451006.33.0.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top