Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents GAO-22-105567, DOD SMALL BUSINESS CONTRACTING: Use of Sole-Source 8(a) Contracts over $22 Million Has Increased

GAO-22-105567, DOD SMALL BUSINESS CONTRACTING: Use of Sole-Source 8(a) Contracts over $22 Million Has Increased

Summary

A Government Accountability Office report, GAO-22-105567, dated March 28, 2022, on the Department of Defense's use of sole-source 8(a) contracts over $22 million. It states that DOD obligated about $10.9 billion to 8(a) program contracts in fiscal year 2021, and that the number of DOD sole-source 8(a) contracts over $22 million grew from six in fiscal year 2016 to 65 in fiscal year 2021, with their collective value rising from $143.5 million to $3.4 billion. It also reports 738 competed 8(a) contracts over $22 million in the same years and no sole-source 8(a) contracts over $100 million before or after the March 17, 2020 threshold change. Of 105 sole-source awards made on or after that date, 50 percent went to firms owned by Alaska Native Corporations, 32 percent to Indian Tribes and 18 percent to Native Hawaiian Organizations.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

441 G St. N.W.
Washington, DC 20548



March 28, 2022


Congressional Committees

DOD SMALL BUSINESS CONTRACTING: Use of Sole-Source 8(a) Contracts over $22
Million Has Increased

In fiscal year 2021, the Department of Defense (DOD) obligated about $10.9 billion to contracts
awarded through the Small Business Administration’s 8(a) Business Development program.
This program is one of the federal government’s primary means for developing small
businesses owned by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals. Contract awards
under this program may be competed among eligible 8(a) firms or awarded on a sole-source
basis in certain instances. For example, 8(a) firms owned by Alaska Native Corporations, Indian
Tribes, or Native Hawaiian Organizations (for DOD only) can receive sole-source contracts for
any dollar amount, while other 8(a) firms generally must compete for contracts valued above
certain thresholds. 1

In March 2011, the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) was amended to implement section
811 in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010. That provision included a
new requirement for a written justification and approval for sole-source 8(a) awards over $20
million, where previously none was required. 2 On October 1, 2015, the threshold for contracts
requiring this justification and approval was raised to over $22 million. 3 A provision in the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 raised the threshold for DOD sole-
source 8(a) contracts to over $100 million, which DOD implemented on March 17, 2020. 4 And
finally, on October 1, 2020, the threshold for sole-source 8(a) awards requiring a justification
and approval for civilian agencies was raised to those over $25 million. 5



1Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) § 19.805-1(a) delineates thresholds for when competition is required for other

8(a) firms for procurements above $4.5 million and $7.5 million, respectively, depending on what is being procured.
This competitive threshold does not apply to 8(a) firms owned by Alaska Native Corporations and Indian Tribes, FAR
§19.805-1(b) (2), or (for DOD only) to 8(a) firms owned by Native Hawaiian Organizations, Defense Acquisition
Regulation Supplement (DFARS) § 219.805-1.
2See Pub. L. No. 111-84, § 811 (2009), including the new requirement and a discussion of the elements required in

an 8(a) justification; FAR §§ 6.303-1(b), 6.303-2.
3See 80 Fed. Reg. 38293, Final rule, July 2, 2015 for notice updating relevant thresholds at FAR §§ 6.303-1(b),

19.808-1(a), effective October 1, 2015.
4A DOD class deviation on March 17, 2020 implemented the increased threshold in section 823(a) of the National

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020. Pub. L. No. 116-92, § 823(a). Office of the Under Secretary of
Defense, Acquisition and Sustainment, Class Deviation—Justification and Approval Threshold for 8(a) Contracts,
March 17, 2020. This class deviation was incorporated in the DFARS on June 5, 2020. 85 Fed. Reg. 34528, Final
rule, June 5, 2020 (effective June 5, 2020); DFARS §§ 206.303, 219.808.
585 Fed. Reg. 62485, Final rule, Oct. 2, 2020 (effective Oct. 1, 2020).




Page 1                                                         GAO-22-105567 DOD 8(a) Sole Source Contracts
Since 2013, we have reported on trends in sole-source 8(a) contracts. 6 In our last report in
2016, we reported that the number of DOD sole-source 8(a) contracts requiring a justification
steadily declined between 2011 and 2015, while the number of competitive 8(a) contracts
generally increased over this time. The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020
includes a provision for us to report on DOD’s use of the authority requiring a justification and
approval for sole-source 8(a) contracts. 7 This report describes the trends in DOD's use of sole-
source and competitive 8(a) contracts above $22 million, from fiscal years 2016 through 2021,
including sole-source 8(a) contracts valued at over $100 million since implementation of the
increased threshold.

To identify trends in the number and value of sole-source and competitive DOD 8(a) contracts
over $22 million, we obtained and analyzed data from the Federal Procurement Data System
(FPDS) from fiscal years 2016 through 2021. We used the total contract value to identify
applicable contracts. 8 Further, when determining the value of the competed 8(a) contracts, we
identified and grouped multiple award indefinite-delivery indefinite-quantity contracts stemming
from the same solicitation together to avoid double counting contract values for contracts for the
same requirement—that is, the goods or services being procured. To identify what DOD
procured with 8(a) contracts over the stated threshold, we used the North American Industry
Classification System codes. 9

We took several steps to assess data reliability, including reviewing the data for outliers or
potential data entry errors. For example, we reviewed sole-source 8(a) contracts awarded to
firms that were not tribal entities and worked with DOD to correct errors where needed. We
determined that the federal procurement data were sufficiently reliable to identify 8(a) contracts
that exceeded the $22 million threshold over the timeframe of our review. We chose October 1,
2015 as our start date because our prior work assessed trends in DOD’s 8(a) contract awards
through September 30, 2015. We used September 30, 2021, as our end date because it
encompassed the most recent complete fiscal year data available at the time of our review.

We conducted this performance audit from November 2021 to March 2022 in accordance with
generally accepted government auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain sufficient, appropriate evidence to provide a reasonable basis for our
findings and conclusions based on our audit objectives. We believe that the evidence obtained
provides a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our audit objectives.




6GAO, DOD Small Business Contracting: Use of Sole-Source 8(a) Contracts over $20 Million Continues to Decline,

GAO-16-557 (Washington, D.C.: June 8, 2016); Contract Management: DOD’s Implementation of Justifications for
8(a) Sole-Source Contracts, GAO-14-721R (Washington, D.C.: Sept. 9, 2014); and DOD’s Implementation of
Justifications for 8(a) Sole-Source Contracts, GAO-13-308R (Washington, D.C.: Feb. 8, 2013).
7National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020, Pub. L. No. 116-92, § 823(c)(2). This subsection requires

our report to include certain details as described in the law.
8We used the Base and All Options Value data element in FPDS, which is defined as the total contract value agreed

upon by the government and the firm performing the contract, including the value of any contract options.
9This system assigns codes to all economic activity within 20 broad sectors, and the codes reflect the industry in

which the firm operates, e.g., wireless telecommunication carriers or industrial building construction.



Page 2                                                           GAO-22-105567 DOD 8(a) Sole Source Contracts
DOD Sole-Source 8(a) Contract Awards over $22 Million Increased While Competitive
Awards Fluctuated

We found that the number and value of DOD sole-source 8(a) contracts over $22 million
increased between fiscal years 2016 through 2021, and none were valued at over $100 million
either before or after implementation of the increased threshold. 10 Specifically, the number of
sole-source 8(a) contracts over $22 million grew steadily from six in fiscal year 2016 to 65 in
fiscal year 2021. The collective value of these sole-source 8(a) contracts increased from $143.5
million in fiscal year 2016 to $3.4 billion in fiscal year 2021. In total, DOD awarded 159 of these
sole-source 8(a) contracts over the 6-year period.

During the same time period, DOD awarded 738 competed 8(a) contracts over $22 million, of
which 184 were valued over $100 million. The trends for the number of competed 8(a) contracts
fluctuated, from 100 in fiscal year 2016 to a high of 186 in fiscal year 2020, with a downturn in
fiscal year 2021. Despite the downturn, the total value of the competed contracts increased from
$3.3 billion in fiscal year 2016 to $9.5 billion in fiscal year 2021. Figure 1 depicts the trends from
fiscal years 2016 through 2021.




10From fiscal years 2016 through 2021, DOD awarded no sole-source 8(a) contracts over $100 million to any 8(a)

firms, including those owned by Alaska Native Corporations, Indian Tribes, or Native Hawaiian Organizations. Since
DOD made no sole-source 8(a) awards over $100 million since the implementation of this increased threshold, we did
not review DOD’s use of the authority as modified by section 832(a)(2) of the statute requiring specified officials to
approve the justifications.



Page 3                                                        GAO-22-105567 DOD 8(a) Sole Source Contracts
Figure 1: Number and Total Contract Value of DOD Competitive and Sole-Source 8(a) Contracts over $22
Million, Fiscal Years 2016 through 2021




Note: Within this 6-year time period, the Department of Defense did not award any sole-source 8(a) contracts over $100 million
before or after the March 17, 2020 threshold change.

DOD awarded 105 sole-source 8(a) contracts on or after March 17, 2020—the date that the
increased threshold was implemented—which reflected an increase over prior years. These
contracts were all over $22 million and up to $100 million, and thus did not require the
justification. Additionally:

•    Half (50 percent) of the 105 sole-source 8(a) contracts were awarded to firms owned by
     Alaska Native Corporations; 32 percent were awarded to firms owned by Indian Tribes; and
     18 percent to firms owned by Native Hawaiian Organizations.

•    The top five products and services under contract were engineering services; other
     computer related services; commercial and institutional building construction; administrative
     management and general management consulting services; and computer system design
     services.

Agency Comments

We provided a draft of this report to DOD for review and comment. DOD had no comments on
this report.




Page 4                                                               GAO-22-105567 DOD 8(a) Sole Source Contracts
We are sending copies of this report to appropriate congressional committees and the Secretary
of Defense. In addition, the report is available at no charge on the GAO website at
http://www.gao.gov.

If you or your staff have any questions about this report, please contact me at (202) 512-4841 or
sawyerj@gao.gov. Contact points for our Offices of Congressional Relations and Public Affairs
may be found on the last page of this report. GAO staff who contributed to this report include
Tatiana Winger, Assistant Director; Sophia Payind, Analyst-in-Charge; Suellen Foth; Laura
Greifner; Julia Kennon; Sylvia Schatz; and Robin Wilson.




John D. Sawyer
Acting Director, Contracting and National Security Acquisitions




Page 5                                             GAO-22-105567 DOD 8(a) Sole Source Contracts
List of Committees

The Honorable Jack Reed
Chairman
The Honorable James M. Inhofe
Ranking Member
Committee on Armed Services
United States Senate

The Honorable Jon Tester
Chairman
The Honorable Richard C. Shelby
Ranking Member
Subcommittee on Defense
Committee on Appropriations
United States Senate

The Honorable Adam Smith
Chairman
The Honorable Mike Rogers
Ranking Member
Committee on Armed Services
House of Representatives

The Honorable Betty McCollum
Chair
The Honorable Ken Calvert
Ranking Member
Subcommittee on Defense
Committee on Appropriations
House of Representatives




(105567)




Page 6                            GAO-22-105567 DOD 8(a) Sole Source Contracts
This is a work of the U.S. government and is not subject to copyright protection in the
United States. The published product may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety
without further permission from GAO. However, because this work may contain
copyrighted images or other material, permission from the copyright holder may be
necessary if you wish to reproduce this material separately.
                         The Government Accountability Office, the audit, evaluation, and investigative
GAO’s Mission            arm of Congress, exists to support Congress in meeting its constitutional
                         responsibilities and to help improve the performance and accountability of the
                         federal government for the American people. GAO examines the use of public
                         funds; evaluates federal programs and policies; and provides analyses,
                         recommendations, and other assistance to help Congress make informed
                         oversight, policy, and funding decisions. GAO’s commitment to good government
                         is reflected in its core values of accountability, integrity, and reliability.

                         The fastest and easiest way to obtain copies of GAO documents at no cost is
Obtaining Copies of      through our website. Each weekday afternoon, GAO posts on its website newly
GAO Reports and          released reports, testimony, and correspondence. You can also subscribe to
                         GAO’s email updates to receive notification of newly posted products.
Testimony
Order by Phone           The price of each GAO publication reflects GAO’s actual cost of production and
                         distribution and depends on the number of pages in the publication and whether
                         the publication is printed in color or black and white. Pricing and ordering
                         information is posted on GAO’s website, https://www.gao.gov/ordering.htm.
                         Place orders by calling (202) 512-6000, toll free (866) 801-7077, or
                         TDD (202) 512-2537.
                         Orders may be paid for using American Express, Discover Card, MasterCard,
                         Visa, check, or money order. Call for additional information.

                         Connect with GAO on Facebook, Flickr, Twitter, and YouTube.
Connect with GAO         Subscribe to our RSS Feeds or Email Updates. Listen to our Podcasts.
                         Visit GAO on the web at https://www.gao.gov.

                         Contact FraudNet:
To Report Fraud,
                         Website: https://www.gao.gov/about/what-gao-does/fraudnet
Waste, and Abuse in
                         Automated answering system: (800) 424-5454 or (202) 512-7700
Federal Programs
                         A. Nicole Clowers, Managing Director, ClowersA@gao.gov, (202) 512-4400, U.S.
Congressional            Government Accountability Office, 441 G Street NW, Room 7125, Washington,
Relations                DC 20548

                         Chuck Young, Managing Director, youngc1@gao.gov, (202) 512-4800
Public Affairs           U.S. Government Accountability Office, 441 G Street NW, Room 7149
                         Washington, DC 20548

                         Stephen J. Sanford, Managing Director, spel@gao.gov, (202) 512-4707
Strategic Planning and   U.S. Government Accountability Office, 441 G Street NW, Room 7814,
External Liaison         Washington, DC 20548




                            Please Print on Recycled Paper.


File and source

File
23-SN10.pdf
Size
256,741 bytes
SHA-256
fc13c47560b78880db788cb7b14a795582bafb739c75cdf2051d20d9d7a7c9a4
Our copy
23-SN10.pdf
Original
www.gao.gov
Back to top