Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents FTC 2024 03 18 Womply Biz2credit 59m

FTC 2024 03 18 Womply Biz2credit 59m

Full text

# FTC Actions Against Companies Making Deceptive Pandemic Loan Promises Lead to Record $59 Million in Damages

**Source:** Federal Trade Commission, Office of Public Affairs
**Date:** March 18, 2024
**URL:** https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2024/03/ftc-actions-against-companies-making-deceptive-pandemic-loan-promises-lead-record-59-million-damages
**Retrieved:** 2026-06-12
**Related primary PDFs (FTC-hosted):** biz2credit_complaint_and_exhibits.pdf; biz2credit_proposed_stip_order.pdf; womply_complaint.pdf; womply_proposed_stipulated_order.pdf

---

The Federal Trade Commission is taking action against two companies – Biz2Credit and Womply – that made false promises to small businesses seeking to take part in the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), delaying and sometimes preventing them from obtaining funds they needed to keep their businesses afloat during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The companies have agreed to settle the FTC's charges against them: Biz2Credit will pay $33 million and Womply will pay $26 million to the FTC for small businesses harmed by their deceptive conduct. These are the largest damages amounts ever secured by the agency under Section 19 of the FTC Act, and include money consumers lost because of the companies' conduct, even if consumers made no payments directly to the companies.

"Biz2Credit and Womply deceived small business owners trying to secure loans at their time of greatest need," said Samuel Levine, Director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection. "The FTC is committed to protecting small businesses from these sorts of unlawful practices."

## Biz2Credit

Biz2Credit, Inc., and its subsidiary, Itria Ventures, have agreed to pay $33 million in damages to settle the Federal Trade Commission's charges that they deceptively advertised that consumers' emergency PPP loan applications would be processed in an average of 10-14 business days when, in reality, the average processing took well over a month.

The FTC's complaint [alleges] that Biz2Credit's application processing was riddled with delays, and the average processing time was double what the defendants claimed, with tens of thousands of consumers waiting more than two months for a final determination. Even though they were aware of these delays, the defendants continued to make their false timing claims to consumers until nearly the end of the program.

Biz2Credit's promises of fast processing times were critical because the PPP was extraordinarily time-sensitive, providing loans on a first-come, first-served basis. The FTC's complaint also says that Biz2Credit unfairly ignored many consumers' repeated and urgent pleas to withdraw their loan applications, and that the defendants designed their application process to lock in as many consumers as possible before underwriting these loans, restricting these consumers from submitting additional applications to other PPP lenders.

In addition to the $33 million monetary judgment, the settlement with Biz2Credit also prohibits the defendants from misrepresenting key information about loan applications or any material fact about a government benefit, and prohibits Biz2Credit from failing to allow consumers to promptly withdraw their applications.

## Womply

Womply and its CEO, Toby Scammell, have agreed to pay $26 million to settle FTC charges they preyed on small businesses in desperate need of PPP funding. The FTC's complaint alleges they widely advertised that small businesses – particularly one-person businesses like gig workers – could successfully get PPP funding when they applied through Womply. The complaint charges, however, that more than 60 percent of Womply applications never resulted in funding.

In addition, according to the complaint, Womply and Scammell advertised that their automated processes and good customer service would help small businesses secure PPP loans fast. In fact, applicants regularly faced significant issues that slowed down or fully hindered their applications and were often unable to receive customer service assistance they were promised, according to the complaint. The company's advertising and marketing also focused on the speed with which applicants' loans would be funded, using product names like "PPP Fast Lane" and promises that loan applications would be prepared within 24 hours and "faster than a bank."

In addition to the $26 million monetary judgment, the settlement with Womply and Scammell prohibits them from making any deceptive, false or unsubstantiated claims about financial services or products.

The Commission votes authorizing the staff to file the complaints and proposed stipulated orders in both cases was 3-0. The complaint and proposed order in Biz2Credit were filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York; the complaint and proposed order in Womply were filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

**NOTE:** The Commission files a complaint when it has "reason to believe" that the named defendants are violating or are about to violate the law and it appears to the Commission that a proceeding is in the public interest.

File and source

File
FTC_2024-03-18_Womply-Biz2Credit-59M.md.txt
Size
6,165 bytes
SHA-256
58649d097a991c59533b6e3db42314fa50814a4c0fb4e76504dc8bcec28d055d
Our copy
FTC_2024-03-18_Womply-Biz2Credit-59M.md.txt
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top