Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Final Order of Forfeiture — United States v. Baoke Zhang, No. CR20-169-RAJ (Dkt. 59, W.D. Wash.)

Final Order of Forfeiture — United States v. Baoke Zhang, No. CR20-169-RAJ (Dkt. 59, W.D. Wash.)

Summary

Judge Richard A. Jones of the Western District of Washington entered this Final Order of Forfeiture, filed 11/22/21, in United States v. Baoke Zhang, No. CR20-169-RAJ. It forfeits to the United States $10,000 in funds seized on June 8, 2020 from a brokerage account ending -2129 opened in the name of Baoke Zhang, as proceeds of wire fraud. The order recites that Zhang agreed in a plea agreement entered on October 22, 2020 to forfeit property traceable to wire fraud proceeds, and that a Preliminary Order of Forfeiture of May 4, 2021 also found a $6,500 sum of money forfeitable. The government published notice and gave direct notice to a potential claimant; the time for third-party claims expired with none filed.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

                Case 2:20-cr-00169-RAJ Document 59 Filed 11/22/21 Page 1 of 3




 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7                         UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
                             WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
 8
                                       AT SEATTLE
 9
10    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                          No. CR20-169-RAJ
11                         Plaintiff,
12                    v.
                                                         FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE
13
      BAOKE ZHANG,
14
                           Defendant.
15
16
17         THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the United States’ Motion for Entry of
18 a Final Order of Forfeiture (“Motion”) for the following property (“Subject Funds”):
19         1.       $10,000 in United States funds seized on June 8, 2020 from Financial
20                  Institution 4 Brokerage Account -2129, opened in the name of Baoke
21                  Zhang.
22         The Court, having reviewed United States’ Motion, as well as the other papers and
23 pleadings filed in this matter, hereby FINDS entry of a Final Order of Forfeiture is
24 appropriate because:
25         •        The proceeds of Wire Fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343, are
26                  forfeitable pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C), by way of 28 U.S.C.
27                  § 2461(c);
28

     FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE - 1                                        UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
                                                                         700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220
     United States v. Baoke Zhang, CR20-169-RAJ
                                                                          SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101
                                                                                 (206) 553-7970
                Case 2:20-cr-00169-RAJ Document 59 Filed 11/22/21 Page 2 of 3




 1         •        Pursuant to the Plea Agreement he entered on October 22, 2020, Defendant
 2                  agreed to forfeit his interest in any property constituting or traceable to
 3                  proceeds of Wire Fraud, including the above-identified Subject Funds,
 4                  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C), by way of 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c).
 5                  Id. ¶ 13;
 6         •        On May 4, 2021, the Court entered a Preliminary Order of Forfeiture
 7                  finding the Subject Funds, and a sum of money in the amount of $6,500
 8                  reflecting additional proceeds Defendant obtained as a result of his
 9                  commission of the offense, forfeitable pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
10                  § 981(a)(1)(C), by way of 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), and forfeiting Defendant’s
11                  interest in the property. See Dkt. No. 48. In addition, the Court determined
12                  that the sum of money in the amount of $6,500 is personal to the
13                  Defendant, and, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure (“Fed. R.
14                  Crim. P.”) 32.2(c)(1), no third-party ancillary process is required before
15                  forfeiting it. Id. at 2;
16         •        Thereafter, the United States published notice of the pending forfeiture of
17                  the Subject Funds as required by 21 U.S.C. § 853(n)(1) and Federal Rule of
18                  Criminal Procedure 32.2(b)(6)(C), Dkt. No. 54, and provided direct notice
19                  to a potential claimant as required by Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(6)(A).
20                  Declaration of AUSA Jehiel I. Baer in Support of Motion for Entry of a
21                  Final Order of Forfeiture ¶ 2, Exhibit A); and,
22         •        The time for filing third-party claims has expired, and none were filed.
23
24         NOW, THEREFORE, THE COURT ORDERS:
25         1.       No right, title, or interest in the Subject Funds exists in any party other than
26 the United States;
27         2.       The Subject Funds are fully and finally condemned and forfeited, in their
28 entirety, to the United States; and,

     FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE - 2                                           UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
                                                                            700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220
     United States v. Baoke Zhang, CR20-169-RAJ
                                                                             SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101
                                                                                    (206) 553-7970
                Case 2:20-cr-00169-RAJ Document 59 Filed 11/22/21 Page 3 of 3




1          3.       The United States Department of Justice, and/or its representatives, is
2 authorized to dispose of the Subject Funds as permitted by governing law.
3
4          IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6          DATED this 22nd day of November, 2021.
7
8
9
10
                                                  A
                                                  THE HON. RICHARD A. JONES
                                                  UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

     FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE - 3                                         UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
                                                                          700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220
     United States v. Baoke Zhang, CR20-169-RAJ
                                                                           SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101
                                                                                  (206) 553-7970


File and source

File
59.pdf
Size
155,892 bytes
SHA-256
a064c493fa6be63483e1aef654cbcee2d4bc5b6d8f950562dbef54df13beb0c4
Our copy
59.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top