Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Final Order of Forfeiture — No. 1:20-cr-00202 (Dkt. 49, D. Idaho)

Final Order of Forfeiture — No. 1:20-cr-00202 (Dkt. 49, D. Idaho)

Summary

A final order of forfeiture of the U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho in United States v. Douglas Wold, Case No. 1:20-CR-00202-DCN, entered as Document 49 of 4 pages and dated January 6, 2022, signed by David C. Nye, Chief U.S. District Court Judge. It is entered on the United States' motion at Dkt. 48 and incorporates the findings on nexus and statutory authority from the Preliminary Order of Forfeiture at Dkt. 27. The subject property is proceeds and funds derived from proceeds in Banner Bank accounts, with approximate minimum amounts: $6,230.34 for Wake Plates LLC, $14,152.44 for Douglas Arnold Wold doing business as Hala Lallo Health, $863.10 for Wold doing business as Wake Plate Design, and sums in two accounts Wold held jointly with persons identified by initials. The order directs disposal according to law.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Final Order of Forfeiture — No. 1:20-cr-00202 (Dkt. 49, D. Idaho).” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/final-order-of-forfeiture-no-1-20-cr-00202-dkt-49-d-idaho-bc9330f1b8/, SHA-256 a393b891ca50b4c09cf9cb45193281aa68854092bac3316799ad042b9972437f.

Full text

         Case 1:20-cr-00202-DCN Document 49 Filed 01/06/22 Page 1 of 4




                            UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                             FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO

 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                             Case No. 1:20-CR-00202-DCN
               Plaintiff,
                                             FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE
        vs.

 DOUGLAS WOLD,

               Defendant.


      This matter comes before the Court on the United States’ Motion for Final Order of

Forfeiture. Dkt. 48.

      The Court entered a Preliminary Order of Forfeiture, (Dkt. 27), of the Subject

Property, and found a sufficient nexus and statutory authority, as described below. The

Court incorporates its findings from the Preliminary Order of Forfeiture into this Final

Order of Forfeiture.

      Subject Property:

      A.      Seized personal Property:

              1. Identified Property. Proceeds and funds derived from proceeds in various

                 bank accounts, including the following (amounts are approximate and at

                 least):

              (a) Banner Bank account ending in 7922 for Wake Plates LLC containing

                 $6,230.34;


FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE - 1
        Case 1:20-cr-00202-DCN Document 49 Filed 01/06/22 Page 2 of 4




             (b) Banner Bank account ending in 9315 for Douglas Arnold Wold d/b/a

                 Hala Lallo Health containing $14,152.44;

             (c) Banner Bank account ending in 1328 for Douglas Arnold Wold d/b/a

                 Wake Plate Design containing $863.10;

             (d) Banner Bank account ending in 6223 for K.A.M.W. and Douglas Arnold

                 Wold containing $9,151,17;

             (e) Banner Bank account ending in 6321 for T.R.M.W. and Douglas Arnold

                 Wold containing $7,800.03;

             (f) Banner Bank account ending in 6528 for K.J.M.W. and Douglas Arnold

                 Wold containing $7,577.12;

             (g) 2019 Tige’ R23 Speedboat, Hull Identification Number TIX0242SD919;

                 and

             (h) 2019   Boatmate    Boat    Trailer,   Vehicle   Identification   Number

                 5A7BB2322KT000147.

      The Defendant agreed that the speedboat and trailer also constitute property

involved in the money laundering offense, Count Thirteen.

      Nexus and Factual Basis for Forfeiture

      Based upon the Plea Agreement, filed April 7, 2021, the defendant admitted that the

Subject Property was proceeds of his schemes, and derived from proceeds, and that the

speedboat and trailer also were involved in money laundering. (ECF No. 18 at 8.) The

defendant pleaded guilty to three counts of the Indictment: Count One, a violation of 18

U.S.C. § 1343, admitting that he committed wire fraud, by depositing false payroll checks


FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE - 2
         Case 1:20-cr-00202-DCN Document 49 Filed 01/06/22 Page 3 of 4




into his own bank account; Count Twelve, a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341, admitting that

he committed mail fraud, by receiving checks by U.S. mail for false and fraudulent

invoices, which he deposited into a bank account he controlled; and Count Thirteen, a

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1957, admitting money laundering by knowingly using criminally-

derived proceeds to purchase the above speedboat and trailer. (ECF No. 18 at 3-5.) The

Court sentenced the Defendant and entered Judgment. (Judgment, ECF No. 44, further

hearings pending for restitution determination.)

       Statutory Authority

       The Court’s forfeiture authority for mail and wire fraud originates from 18 U.S.C.

§ 981(a)(1)(C) through 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), which provides that, when imposing sentence

on any person convicted of a violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341 or 1343, the Court, shall order

the person to forfeit property, real or personal, that constitutes or is derived, directly or

indirectly, from proceeds traceable to the commission of the offense.           For money

laundering, 18 U.S.C. § 982(a)(1) provides for forfeiture of property involved in or

traceable to the money laundering offense.

       The Court’s Additional Findings

       The Court FINDS that the record and pleadings reflect the following.

       The United States caused notice of the above-referenced forfeiture order to be

published and sent in accordance with the requirements of Federal Rule of Criminal

Procedure 32.2(b)(6)(A). This included publication on an official government internet site

(www.forfeiture.gov). See Criminal Rule 32.2(b)(6)(C) and Rule G(4)(a)(iv)(C) of the

Supplemental Rules for Admiralty and Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions.


FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE - 3
         Case 1:20-cr-00202-DCN Document 49 Filed 01/06/22 Page 4 of 4




       No claims were filed.

       The Court’s Orders

       The Court therefore ORDERS the following.

       The Motion for Final Order of Forfeiture (Dkt. 48) is GRANTED.

       The Court directs the United States Attorney General (or a designee) to seize all of

the forfeited properties described in this Order, not previously seized.

       All right, title and interest to the Subject Property is hereby condemned, forfeited

and vested in the United States. No claim of interest in said property shall exist in any

other person or entity. Said property shall be disposed of according to law.

       All parties herein shall bear their own costs and fees.


                                                  DATED: January 6, 2022


                                                  _________________________
                                                  David C. Nye
                                                  Chief U.S. District Court Judge




FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE - 4

File and source

File
49.pdf
Size
160,296 bytes
SHA-256
a393b891ca50b4c09cf9cb45193281aa68854092bac3316799ad042b9972437f
Our copy
49.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top