Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Exhibit Response to Judge's order — No. 1:21-cv-00748 (Dkt. 81-2)Search ⌕

Source documents · Archived capture

Exhibit Response to Judge's order — No. 1:21-cv-00748 (Dkt. 81-2)

Summary

An exhibit filed January 24, 2022 as Document 81-2 in Natasha Athens d/b/a Favorite Things v. Bank of America and Megan Scholz, Civil Action No. 1:21-cv-00748-SM (D.N.H.), reproducing the plaintiff's objection and motion to reconsider the partial dismissal, dated January 22, 2022. It accuses the judge of bias, argues that the defendants filed but never served their response, and states that the loan was being forgiven before Scholz pulled it out of forgiveness. It asks the court to require sworn affidavits from Scholz, defense counsel Thomas Pappas and the judges, cites 28 U.S. Code § 144, and seeks reinstatement of the emotional distress claim or recusal. The 7-page exhibit is signed /s/ by Athens.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Archived source document. Preserved source.

View original PDF · 1.5 MB

Original: archive.org

Record facts

File name81-att2-exhibit-response-to-judge-s-order.pdf
SHA-256b12aff281ab3e43f9beaab9bdbcfc7649a9bdc9a5f827bf64ca18ebf3f12f97d
Size1,578,797 bytes
Source sitearchive.org

File and source

File
81-att2-exhibit-response-to-judge-s-order.pdf
Size
1,578,797 bytes
SHA-256
b12aff281ab3e43f9beaab9bdbcfc7649a9bdc9a5f827bf64ca18ebf3f12f97d
Our copy
81-att2-exhibit-response-to-judge-s-order.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top