Exhibit, Request for Default, First Circuit No. 22-1003 — Athens v. Primmer Piper Eggleston & Cramer PC

Summary

An exhibit filed January 24, 2022 as Document 81-1 in No. 1:21-cv-00748 (D.N.H.), reproducing an appellant's request for a default ruling in the First Circuit case No. 22-1003, Natasha Athens, d/b/a Favorite Things v. Primmer Piper Eggleston & Cramer PC. Athens argues under Rule 5 that Thomas Pappas filed an appearance but never served it on the appellant, and that the time to serve has lapsed. The request asks the court to enter a default and award the $25M Athens sought, stating that the appellee has defaulted on 2 cases totaling $30M in damages. The 2-page exhibit is signed /s/ by Athens with a certificate of email service dated January 22, 2022.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

       Case 1:21-cv-00748-SM Document 81-1 Filed 01/24/22 Page 1 of 2




                        United States Court of Appeals
                             For the First Circuit
                            ___________________
                                 No. 22-1003
                    NATASHA ATHENS, d/b/a Favorite Things,
                             Plaintiff - Appellant,
                                        v.
                   PRIMMER PIPER EGGLESTON & CRAMER PC,
                            Defendant - Appellee.

APPELLANT'S REQUEST FOR A DEFAULT RULING
Rule 5. Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers

Now comes the Appellant in the above entitled matter and requests that the
Defaulted Defendant be issued a ruling as such.

He filed for an appearance but failed to serve the Appellant at all, Thomas Pappas
has deemed himself above the law, and rewritten the rules for electronic filing.

He was bypassing the filing system for service by purposely harassing the
Plaintiff/Appellant at her residence but those items were returned.

In this case, despite 2 emails, the Appellee FAILED to serve in any form, he
ignored all methods. He cannot.

WHEREFORE, even though the court ordered a "show cause" pleading, in the
meantime, the time lapsed for the Appellee to serve his notice of Appearance at
all to the Appellant. He is time barred from service at this late date.

The Defendant has now defaulted himself on 2 cases, totalling $30M in damages
vs. respond or settle which he laughed at at the time.

WHEREFORE, The Appellant seeks the JUDGE applying RULE 5, and awarding the
Appellant the $25M she sought which the district court has tried to deny the
       Case 1:21-cv-00748-SM Document 81-1 Filed 01/24/22 Page 2 of 2




Appellant the right to seek, and this court sought a show cause, despite the act of
illicitly obtaining and leaking tax records a felony.

This court is obligated under Rule 5 to issue such a default and order that the
Appellee Pay the Plaintiff/Appellant all that she sought in the case, since he
refused to settle.

/s/ Natasha Athens

Certificate of Service to Non-Party Defaulted Thomas Pappas via email on
January 22, 2022


File and source

File

81-att1-exhibit-request-for-default.pdf

Size

792,075 bytes

SHA-256

9f36cc9530cc6353a6171e75d0807e6608833e60e85d53d5340b15704188a738

Our copy

81-att1-exhibit-request-for-default.pdf

Original

archive.org